I never commented on the Rittenhouse case until I started watching large chunks of the trial, and all I can say is that anyone who has done the same and denies that there's a huge gap between the media narrative about this and what actually happened is not telling the truth.
Hey, I'm a lawyer who admits I haven't watched the trial ("in minute detail") but I'd nonetheless like to announce that the view I have of what happened is exactly what my liberal followers want to hear and will instantly click re-tweet: pure toxicity.
https://mobile.twitter.com/nycsouthpaw/status/1458501505552633857
Kudos to @AnaKasparian for acknowledging that, as she actually watched the trial, she realized that the narrative she was fed by corporate media about the Rittenhouse case was wildly different than the fact. And this before the most important evidence:
It's almost inconceivable that these charges would have been filed absent the political climate and social media demanding it, which is rather alarming. I've rarely seen a judge this hostile to the prosecution before. It's not done, so we'll see, but it's extraordinary.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
