Post

More from @Trinhnomics

Trinh

@Trinhnomics

Aug 26

https://twitter.com/ThePrintIndia/status/1960211274694005159

Despite the 50% tariffs imposed by Trump, India's future is more trade & not less & why tariffs will need to go down.

Here we go, a thread.

https://twitter.com/ThePrintIndia/status/1960211274694005159

From winning the Trump trade war, India is now the US President’s biggest target. The Trump administration imposed a 25% tariff on India. To add insult to injury, Trump announced another 25% tariff, effective tomorrow, on the grounds that India imports crude oil from Russia.

Indian goods bound for the US will now face tariff rates similar to China’s if we include the Trump 1.0 tariffs, making any China+1 strategy in India less competitive for US markets, and relative to Southeast countries, which for the most part face tariff rates of about 20 per cent.

Will the additional 25% tariff stick? While Russia’s war with Ukraine isn’t going to end by Wednesday, the secondary Trump tariff is likely temporary. Therefore, the question is not whether India will be able to bring the 50% back down to at least 25%, but when.

Read 12 tweets

Trinh

@Trinhnomics

Aug 22

Eight months after Trump has been inaugurated and we of course have now the EU US deal. What do we know about Trumponomics?

I would say my read is the Miran paper is a blueprint for Trump actions so far on trade. Let's see what I mean by that. And this has consequences of how Trump sees India, which I think is not just escalation to gain leverage.

First, let's talk about an important ally, the EU. The details are out and I would say this is actually rather good for the EU in the context of out of control Trump tariffs.

Why? EU tariffs are NOT stacked. They are ceilings. As in, they get 15% max, including sectoral tariffs like auto (including car parts), pharma, semiconductor, lumber etc but not steel & alum, which they are still trying to negotiate. There are some additional exemptions for EU products such as aircraft, parts, generic pharmas & ingredients etc.

Meaning, to trade for this 15%, the EU is falling closer into the US orbit via investment and trade as well as defense, which it is working on being more self sufficient with increased spending but not just yet.

Anyway, what can you say about other allies? It means South Korea and Japan can and hopefully have similar terms.

Remember that reciprocal tariffs under IEEPA aren't the only ones. Section 232s are pretty scary and more stuff being added all the time without warnings.

An example is steel where a few days ago 400 more products were added to include steel derivatives.

So if you want to have access, this is basically what the costs are and so what does that tell you about others? Here I go back to the Miran paper.

Read 14 tweets

Trinh

@Trinhnomics

Aug 21

Russia import imports since 2022. If this calculation is correct, the arbitrage is USD2.5/barrel currently, then annual saving is USD1.5bn.

India trade balance with BRICS: It buys way more than it sells.

Some say more BRICS is the answer. But looking at trade as it is right now, what needs to happen?

India total exports to all the countries in BRICS is less than just to the US alone.

Read 7 tweets

Trinh

@Trinhnomics

Aug 1

Guys, let's do it. All things Trump tariffs. Here we go. First, let's talk about the basics. 10% is the floor as in everyone gets that. And these are the economies that get higher than that:
15% (EU, Japan, South Korea and 33 countries: Angola, Botswana, etc.)
18% (Nicaragua)
19% (Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Thailand)
20% (Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Vietnam)
25% (Brunei, India, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Tunisia)
30% (Algeria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Libya, South Africa)
35% (Iraq, Serbia)
39% (Switzerland)
40% (Laos, Myanmar)
41% (Syria)

In Asia, it looks like this. Excluding China and Myanmar, Laos, India got the highest - 25% and maybe more.

China is waiting for talks on extension. Right now, it's 10% reciprocal + 20% fentanyl during extension + 25% during Trump 1.0

Southeast Asia gets 20% to 19% except Laos & Myanmar at 40%, Brunei is 25% but energy is exempt so...

India original was 26% so 25% seems bad but frankly not too far from the Southeast Asians. That being said, India was aiming closer to 15% as Vietnam got dropped from 46% to 20%.

Anyway, let's talk about details of the White House info.

It goes into effect 7th August. But if you got stuff in ports/front-loading and not yet consumed till 1 October, there are varied rates for them.

Long story short, there is still time to negotiate this down before it goes into effect basically.

Read 13 tweets

Trinh

@Trinhnomics

Jul 30

Trump tariff strikes India at 25% plus Russian oil import punishment. Is it a surprise? Not exactly. I have been thinking for a week what a US India deal look like. And to be honest, I think I saw this coming. I think India can negotiate down from this threat btw. It's not final. But how much lower and what are the costs?

Why is it not a surprise that India is not getting the deal that it is working hard on?

First, let's look at the EU and Japan - they got smacked with 15% tariff & got reprieve for auto (and other sectors) but auto is key at 15%.

So 15% is the best India can get. And it won't get it. Why? Well, it has to offer a lot to Trump to get that and it won't.

Remember that this is just a threat (similar to what Trump did with Japan before they settled on a lower number) and the threat I suppose can be real or not. Irrespective, he cares about it enough to post about it.

Trump has a few agendas that he wants India or Modi's help with.

Ending that Ukraine War is one. And India is not interested in that. It's an emerging country that buys where it can cheapest.

Russian oil is cheapest & so it buys from Russia & Trump wants to starve Russia of oil revenue. India doesn't want to not buy the cheapest oil possible. Besides, Russia is neither a foe nor a friend.

Maybe the West's foe but not India. So on this point, very hard. What are the costs to India? Well, it will have to pay more for its oil if it doesn't buy the cheapest oil.

Trump is adding to that costs - tariff.

Read 6 tweets

Trinh

@Trinhnomics

Jul 28

India imported 15,000 cars a year. Why? It has 110% tariff on autos. Now, trade negotiations are not going well and it's approaching the WTO on Trump's 25% auto tariff.

But the reason is simple. India exports more than it imports autos. Why? It has pretty high tariff on auto.

What would an India trade deal look like then? Is there going to be one?

What's interesting is that the UK and India signed a trade deal that is supposedly a huge game changer.

Let's take a look at it.

Under the agreement, tariffs on imports of internal combustion engine (ICE) cars will be slashed to 30-50% in the first year of implementation, but with the benefit limited to a quota of 20,000 cars.

The tariffs will be reduced gradually, and after 15 years, they will become 10 per cent, with the quota set at 15,000 units. For out-of-quota imports of ICE cars, the duties are reduced to 60-95 per cent in the first year, and further to 45-50 per cent from the tenth year onwards.

So on the surface, it looks like a big deal but the quotas are so tiny that it makes one wonder.

Of course, relative to annual import, quotas are HUGE as it is MORE than annual import.

But why do people care so much about US 25% auto tariff but don't care so much about India's 110% auto tariff?

Well, because the US imports 8m cars EVERY YEAR.

Look at the big deal that is the UK and India trade deal liberalization. There is a limit in quota.

The quota that the US sets for the UK is 100,000. So in other words, the US remains a big deal and one that needs to be negotiated with.

Read 4 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Trinh

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @Trinhnomics

Trinh

Trinh

Trinh

Trinh

Trinh

Trinh

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!