The funniest argument I have ever read is Augustine's theory of sexual shame in City of God. It somehow starts with a totally reasonable question ("Why is our nudity shameful?") and ends up someplace beyond gonzo... about the agility of our genitalia in Paradise. Thread:
So here's Augustine's question: why is our nudity supposed to be shameful?

It can't be because our bodies are shameful, because they're made in God's image.
It can't be because sex is bad, because God told us to reproduce.
It can't be because pleasure is bad, because there's plenty of other pleasures that are fine.

So what is it?
(At this point, in intro-type classes, already some of my Christian students' minds are blown because it never occurred to them to even ask this question. And here is an actual Christian saint, and unquestioned key figure in theology is straight up dismissing fave options.)
So then Augustine says: whatever it was had to have *changed* about us when Adam and Eve fell, because our bodies weren't shameful beforehand. But our body shape didn't change, including the shape of our genitals. So what was it?
Answer: our sexual parts aren't shameful in and of themselves. It is that they *display our weakness of the will* by *running out of our control* - along with the sexual passions behind them.
Augustine literally says: our weakness of the will is displayed when we are sexually inflamed when we think we ought not be, or when we cannot be sexually inflamed when rationally, we think we should. (!!!)
So this must have changed during the fall - because we weren't shameful before hand. So it must be the *God inflicted on Adam and Eve sexual weakness of the will as our punishment for disobeying him*. But why?
Augustine says: *God made our parts disobey us, as a mark of the FORM AND CONTENT OF OUR SIN, because we disobeyed him, and he wants us to forever remember what disobedience feels like*.

Fucking mic drop.
So, Augustine says, if we hadn't fell, we would have... and these are his words... have had as much direct control over our sexual members as an artisan does his hands.

And we will again, in Paradise.
This is from a chapter of City of God called "On the Justice of the Good Lord's Punishment for the First Man and Woman" or something like that. I found discovered it as a chapter in Solomon's Philosophy of Love and Sex reader, which is just full of great stuff.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with C Thi Nguyen

C Thi Nguyen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @add_hawk

27 May
"The Seductions of Clarity" is now officially out!

It's about how to fake clarity - how to manipulate the *feeling* of understanding to manipulate beliefs. With two core case studies: conspiracy theories and bureaucratic language.

Thread:
cambridge.org/core/journals/…
The main idea: we are cognitively limited beings, that need to guesstimate what's worth investigating, and what's not. We need a *heuristic for terminating thought*. Because we don't have the time to investigate everything.
Proposal: many of us use the *feeling of clarity* as a heuristic for terminating thought. We use the feeling of confusion as a signal to investigate something, and the feeling of clarity as a signal that we're done.
Read 10 tweets
30 Mar
One of the best pieces of advice I ever got, delivered by a wise person while I was fuming over a parking ticket:

"3% of your income is for mistakes. If it's too much over, you're too sloppy. If it's too much under, you're sweating the smalls stuff too much."
The exact number should probably be varied depending on life circumstances, etc. But the idea that one can make *too few* mistakes and that this is a sign of wasted energy on diminishing returns was... profoundly transformative, and I've ended up applying it everywhere.
Related: A German friend just told me that Germany is having a much worse time with the vaccine rollout, literally because Germany is spending a huge amount of time making sure only eligible people get the vaccine, where the US has a "if a few people line-skip, eff-it" strategy.
Read 4 tweets
22 Feb
So I've been stuck on the camera policy for my Zoom classes. I totally get the worries about student privacy and invasiveness. But I also know that my teaching gets radically worse when I'm facing mostly all black squares. So this time, I tried complete honesty.

Report-thread:
My last term of Zoom/COVID teaching, I was totally convinced by the arguments that demanding cameras on was an invasion of privacy, that looking into a student's home life was a totally different matter from having them show up into your class.
I said, very directly, that I had no problems with cameras off. The result: all students left their cameras off, and I was left lecturing into a sea of black squares. I found this exhausting, isolating, miserable. And my teaching suffered badly, from lack of feedback.
Read 15 tweets
8 Feb
New paper forthcoming: "The Seductions of Clarity"! The paper is about the seductive *feeling* of clarity, and how that feeling might be faked - and how our cognitive vulnerabilities might be manipulated.

Thread-summary:

philpapers.org/rec/NGUTSO-2
It's about the *sense* of understanding - not actual, genuine understanding, but the *feeling* associated with understanding. I propose: we use this sense of clarity as a thought-terminating heuristic.
We cognitively limited beings actually need a heuristic to end our investigations. But this creates a huge vulnerability. If an epistemic manipulator can fake the sense of clarity, then they can get us to end our investigations too early - and swallow a flawed belief system.
Read 12 tweets
3 Feb
If you're looking for some weird aesthetic exploration to fight off the COVID boredom blues, can I recommend: avant-garde perfume. No, really. First:

1. Not all perfume is cloying mall crap. There's world of indie, experimental weird-ass perfume.
2. It's cheap.

Thread:
First: there is this whole world of weird, fascinating, unexpected perfume. Perfume that smells like burning leaves on an autumn afternoon. That smells like a dairy farm. That smells like a distant Tuscan town in winter. Like the coming snow. Abstract scents.
One of my favorite weird scents: Room 237, a scent that is based on the creepy room from The Shining. It is weird, unsettling, synthetic, fascinating.

luckyscent.com/product/69303/…
Read 15 tweets
2 Feb
Really excited about this episode of Decoding the Gurus, which I was on. They've been studying the toxic gurus of online culture, in lovingly horrific detail. The hosts are a psychologist and an anthropologist. We jammed. True interdisciplinary mind-meld!
The opening is me brain-vomiting my stuff on echo chambers, fake clarity, moral porn. But I'm just a philosopher doing conceptual crap. @ArthurCDent and @C_Kavanagh are empiricists who have soaked themselves in online toxic guru culture. They start feeding me delicious detail...
... and we really get somewhere. Most interesting part for me: I've been using a pretty simplistic toy model, where I'm trying to figure out how a manipulative leader might design a belief system for seductive, tasty clarity. But they ask: could the leader be pushed from below?
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(