Let's talk about going short after another permabear fund announced shut down.
But before that, I'll talk briefly about going to the casino. It's related in a way.
I don't like casinos because I don't like to be around so many losers. The energy is bad. Casino players essentially go short the casino with tiny odds to win.
Last time I visited one was many years ago. I made windfall profits with a martingale system playing the roulette.
I cashed the ships and tried to get out. A few waitresses blocked my way offering free drinks and a man in black suit offered me a room at the hotel. I had to find an exclude to leave as the pressure to stay was mounting. Why? Because they knew if I stay long enough, I'd lose.
But I knew that also. I haven't been to a casino since. Why? Because if I go back there chances are high I will return some or all of the profits I made going AGAINST them.
End of story. Shorting stocks and being permabear is going against the casino. A few people are lucky.
These lucky people, like those who "predicted" the 1987 crash, or "the real estate crisis" in 2008 wrongly attribute one-time windfall profits to some skill. The point is even if they had skill FOR THAT PARTICULAR EVENT, they may not have the skill for a different event.
I remember those Elliott Wave traders of the 80s who expected a market crash in mid 90s that never came. Then those 2008 winners that expected a crash every year after 2010 that never came other than the pandemic one followed by a quick recovery. It's an exercise in futility
In 25+ years of quant trading strategy research and development I was never able to find one consistent short-only strategy in any market. Profits are due to chance and lucky ones make huge mistake to attribute it to skill they can replicate in the future. Take the money and run.
Money in the markets is made slowly and in discipline way using a high Sharpe strategy with low volatility and by using some margin. Chasing stocks to short or trying to time the market for that left tail event by constantly buying convexity is too costly.
Instead of chasing windfall profits from a short it's better making as much as possible from the long side and then getting out even with small loss when turmoil starts. You can work in the garden, read some books or learn a foreign lang while some suffer from the short squeezes.
Principle in trading: Never try to return to "crime scene". They are waiting for you. They will take every single penny you have. Remember those XIV short volatility traders who thought they were printing money in 2017? Most ended up broke in a day. It only takes minutes.
Conclusion: Luck cannot be replicated. Windfall profits are once in a lifetime events for most people in the markets. Take the money and run and never make the mistake to think it was skill.
*chips* and *find an excuse*
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Overall it's interesting but there is a problem. The thread compares an additive process to a multiplicative one. Similar to those comparing number of deaths from ladder falling to those from virus infections. You simply can't compare these two processes.
2/ Save the fact that it's irrelevant to trading/investing. The payoffs are random variables and both additive or multiplicative can result to ruin/uncle point despite the positive "expectation" if there isn't enough capital to cover losses from drawdown.
3/ The Kelly criterion results in way excessive risk and although there is no "ruin" theoretically there can be "uncle point". Thus, although a nice theoretical exercise, this has little relation to investing, trading and risk management.
"Why do you sell software and strategies if they are making money?"
They usually imply there is something fishy.
Well, these people usually don't understand trading and risk management.
I recall recently someone asked @chanep this question during a webinar where he was talking about his ML software. His answer was good: Because I need to raise capital to trade.
So let's take this from start. There are three components: operation, capital and risk management.
Operation: I'm not raising OPM. I trade my own money. I don't like risking OPM. Retail traders cannot allocate all their money to trading. There are expenses they must cover every month.
The typical capital of retail trader ranges from maybe $50K to $1M. Not enough money.
🧵The advantages of retail and large AUM funds over small funds.
1. Large AUM funds move the markets. If they even face 20% - 50% redemptions during that doesn't affect them much. They can always use their huge marketing and PR departments to make it back when markets recover.
2. Large AUM is an edge. Many market participants fail to understand this. Large funds can invalidate technical and fundamentals any time they want. But they are careful and focus on the longer-term.
3. On the other hand retail has many advantages most don't realize or exploit. After a 20% drawdown no one will call a retail trader in the middle of the nigh and ask for emergency meeting. Retail has freedom of movement. Freedom is also an edge of some kind.
What is forecasting? Forecasting is basically number crunching for the purpose of making decisions and developing data-driven strategies. There is a whole array of methods, tools and procedures.
But before we even start: forecasting is both art and science. At times, it may be 90% art and 10% science. Why? Because reality is underdetermined by data. This indeterminism is fundamental and beyond the scope of this thread. This is subject of grad courses in phi of science.
Not all methods and tools apply to all forecasts. It's important to understand that application is domain specific. Different tools are used for weather forecast than those used for inventory and sales forecast.
Thread about trading strategies. Get a bowl of rice and chopsticks but never stick the chopsticks into the rice and never cross them. Those are bad signs.
I started developing #tradingstrategy in the early 90s accidentally.
I was working in Wall Street in fixed income developing algos for bond portfolio management, calculating funding gaps for money market desks and trading the bond basis. They were interesting but boring jobs.
Someone I knew asked me if I could backtest a strategy for trading currency futures. I accepted the challenge but it turned out the strat wasn't any good. But I found the trick to make it good. The person insisted this was a way to "print" our own money. I had my doubts.
Thread about #trading. Get a glass of mineral water (I stopped drinking coffee 20 years ago)
In last 10 years I've come across in twitter numerous overconfident TA traders using charts with lines and indicators on them. Most come and go. Many lose everything, some go passive.
Trading is zero-sum game. Futures and forex are zero-sum by construction, stock #trading is zero-sum for intraday and short-term #traders. You need significant edge to survive in this game and it must be mathematical and robust.
I had this smart friend managing a fund during GFC. He faced liquidation and lost about $50M due to overleveraging and being to confident about his ability to forecast future prices. He ended up DJ in a club.