Currently, surgical masks as long as within 6 feet of the CoVid+. No recirculating. gov.uk/government/pub…
All based on WHO guidance. (Foreshadow.)
The default ventilation of the ambulance is 5 ACH, IF the exhaust blower was on.
They replaced the default ventilation tho with the below HEPA filter, so they could get accurate measurements, avoiding external aerosols, and reset quickly.
"For each test, four optical particle counters
(OPCs) were placed in locations representing possible positions for a seated EMS worker treating the
patient. OPCs were placed in the positions labeled OPC 1-4 when the cot was at 0° or 30°, and positions ..."
Before going on, let's touch on the 5 ACH that all of you will be hit with in surgical masks.
Even with surgical masks on, we have certainly seen a huge number of outbreaks in hospitals with 6 ACH (better) ventilation
and continuous surgical masking.
For example, Alberta Health Services, @AHS_media, which is the embodiment of the @WHO's IPC guidance.
Stands to reason as Dr. Conly rules over AHS AND the WHO with a very clean fist.
Back to our clown car, Lindsley (yep, the famous one) found that a single cough resulted at least some worker exposure.
Given that Delta is everywhere, and we now know it takes under 3 virii to successfully infect?
Not good.
Might not be a bad idea to buy a @FixTheMask brace
in case you have to go to the hospital or even ride in an ambulance.
Or make the 3 rubber band version and keep it in your wallet or purse:
Why would there still be exposure?
"Air circulation pattern in the ambulance patient compartment generated by...
the ventilation
system. The jet of air created by the air inlet causes a clockwise recirculation pattern to form which
circulates aerosol particles throughout the compartment. Even if the cough is directed toward the rear
of the ambulance, aerosol particles are carried
toward the front by the recirculation. Thus, a worker
anywhere in the ambulance is exposed to the cough aerosol particles."
Thus, you will be exposed to the same.
But does it have to be this way?
No. Or I should say, N100.
The same solution as in this thread that was
slightly viral about 25 years of no infection in the Texas TB hospital:
"The effective
air change rates ranged from about 43 to 46 ACH in
the HEPA ambulance, and from 26 to 32 ACH in the
non–HEPA ambulance."
This provides further proof that
portable air cleaners such as the Corsi/Rosenthal Box are additive to any current air cleaning infrastructure.
And...they help remove aerosols much faster.
The message is the same because this is NOT rocket science.
Vax.
N100.
HEPA if you can afford it.
CR Box if you can't
A very cool simulation model study confirming what Dr. Noakes shared below. Thank you!
1 - An ambulance transport with a patient actively emitting a virus.
2 - A subsequent transport with an uninfected patient <- very interesting setup here.
Please explain how a study measuring physical improvement in a Cognitive and Behavioral study can have unmeasured Graded Exercise Therapy - and be considered as well-controlled. Not confounded.
So, I emailed Dr. Ebell and asked how that was nitpicking.
I also agreed with the comments at the bottom of the study, linked below.
If you change analysis protocols post hoc? That's not nitpicking in my book. But maybe that is nitpicking?
DYK that you, and me, and everybody are Pig Pen from Charlie Brown?
We shed our entire outer layer of skin every 2-4 weeks, about 500 million cells daily.
Your corneocytes (outermost cells) lift off of your body with the
gentlest of micro-air currents. Like a leaf picked up off the ground for the briefest of moments in fall.
They act like 12 micron aerosols in float time, but 25% of total skin flakes are sub 5 microns...and you know what that means. Deep deposition - or shallow as
sub 5 likes to also deposit in the nose.
It's funny...I embrace push-back in debate. Tightens up my game.
Imagine if those skin flakes now have Ebola on them?
Two studies show that Ebola literally oozes through the skin - both ways. In and out.
"...due to the desirability of an off-
the-face design, and not for protection from aerosols, respirators may be used instead of medical masks"who.int/publications/i…
If you can stay 3 feet away while screening? No medical mask needed.