1/ What is wrong in NL?

so many lockdowns
so many test for entry
so many school closures
so mutch fear
masking 1.5 years
teleworking 1.5 years
alcohol bans
months of curfew
police beating demonstrators
QR fundamentalism

and now this ??

Bottom figures: panic why? Image
2/ NL will now punish the unvaxxed with 2G to protect them.

Those are mainly below 35. The healthy young future of NL. Do you see how they need to be protected? Image
3/ Therefore the young and children need to "urgently" be vaccinated, although this data should make you wonder why. ImageImage
4/ But NL was rewarded for all this or not?

I fail to see it. I don't read news nor watch TV. I read data. That's my destiny as scientist. I fail to understand what people are thinking around me. Image
5/ But SWE must have failed totally?

Without lockdowns, everything should have collapsed. 10x deaths forecast!

I fail to see it. NL is worse.

2020 SWE (left) versus 2020 NL (right). Age adjusted mortality rate by age group.

15-64y top
65-74
75-84
85+ bottom Image
6/ NL: It was the worst pandemic since 100 years. We needed to lock down the children and the healthy to protect them. Is this plausible?

I fail to see it.

7/ But Sweden killed people. Their neighbours did much better. No they did not.

The neighbours like DNK need to ask themselves: why do "kill" people 3 years earlier on average? ImageImage
8/ But Finland. See above. 2 years worse life expectancy. You need to have people in the elderly bin in order to make the all age excess possible with the Simpson's illusion (btw. the reason for most panic). Even worse, use z-scores to compare countries.
ImageImage
11/ But let's also look to the "holy land" of this new lockdown religion. USA. They must have done better?

No, Sweden outperformed everyone. Without radical measures. No masking. Not blaming children. Not depriving them from school. Not masking them. ImageImage
12/ But Portugal did the MOST stick measures, are 98% vaxxed, and finally did better was a remark from a Dutch gentleman. @Theunis48

He did not like being falsified.

They want lockdown. Are they (the old vaxxed) scared of children and young citizens?

ImageImage
13/ Related "pandemic of the unvaccinated" panic blog, and how MSM and politics fail in math.

Image
14/ Could this be an issue in NL?

left: NL population increase since 1970 in the 75+ group: 300%
right: ICU capacity NL since 1970: -50%

Could it be a problem? @hugodejonge Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Orwell2024

Orwell2024 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @orwell2022

Jan 13
1/ The non reality sides are converging on the harmlessness of lockdowns. 😂

They both have a one parameter explanation where lockdowns do no harm:

A) Covid explains it all
B) Vaxx damage explains it all

"I do not need a number to prove the obvious"
2/ Next one

"We've been through worse than 2 years locked up. We were hungry, we had almost no clothes"

Sure: NL life expectancy
1940: 60-70 y
1920: 82 y

Let's go back to 81 y, 78 y...with lockdowns? Fine? No big deal.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 13
1/ The reactions to this are stunning.

1) The lockdown side sais "Covid" and deny open Sweden, Norway, FL, Amish...

2) The vaxx is doing all cause excess side sais: the "vaxx"and they deny the high vaxx shining Sweden and Norway.

Equal trauma on both sides.
2/ Both sides use confounded non adjusted OWID excess, but mostly no data at all.

One claim is bad batches:

By chance, all lockdown countries had this issue, but not Norway and Sweden with their open approach leaving kids free.
3/ The vaxx side has no issues with fundamental contradictions, like the unrealistic (percent range) fatality rate needed to make such an excess.

We show them a theoretical example: No engagement, but change of topic. Ignore math and exponential mortality basics and continue.
Read 12 tweets
Jan 13
1/ US: Surge In Deaths Among People Aged 18-49.

Note: we don't see this is West Europe (Sweden has under mortality in this age group), but in the East yes.

Why is it bad to follow Sweden? Can we agree that it would be nice to have their outcome?

theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/northe…
2/ Now here the comparison USA - Sweden. Shown are age specific mortality rates for the group 15-64 years.

The 2021 excess in US is drastic. Sweden: under mortality. Also last year Sweden did fine on 15-64. Covid did not do this. Hysteria did. Stop it now!
3/ So let's also show the same age group 15-64 for the great pandemic year 2020 and show how Sweden "failed" (to kill the young) while USA was following the pope of science, Dr. Fauci.

Can you see it? Nothing in Sweden.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 12
1/ Average age of death follow up.

Problem: the chosen window of averaging is a strong factor when aggregating. Aggregations are generally bad as mentioned many times. They destroy information.

So let's go back to raw data.
2/ Let's show it like this.

We spot immediately the 2020 85 years peak in Spain.

Amazing. 85 years.

There are worse problems in the world, that having an average death age of 85.

Percieving this as a catastrophy is totally pathetic.
3/ So let's explain even better with a question.

Is it:

A) better to have unavoidable swings (excess) like Italy, Spain, and Sweden at world record life expectancy levels?

OR

B) better to be Denmark at years lower life expectancy but without swings (because excess is scary)?
Read 5 tweets
Jan 11
1/ After checking, that mortality.org is actually showing the age standardized mortality rates under "death rate, total", we can work with their all age value.


Here now Netherlands:Sweden 2021. No words. It's a disaster. Below Sweden. Perfect.
2/ Germany : Sweden.

Germany: disaster. The lockdowns finally worked. The other way around. Record excess. And continuously over the weeks. This is what politicians and hysteria did. Not the virus.
3/ Austria : Sweden. @freiheit_ruft

Austria lockdown master: disaster. The lockdowns finally worked. The other way around. Record excess. And continuously over the weeks. This is what politicians and hysteria did. Not the virus.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 9
1/ I actually don't like working with VAERS. One would need a data-prep tool, which CDC has, but me not (out of scope to develop). Still, I took a look.

The issues with lot IDs and VEARS deaths/AE are:
-Age confounded (average administered dates).
-Different batch sizes. Image
2/ We immediately see the high age of most deaths and related batches. We do have confounding to resolve. Deaths, both C19 and vaxx, is an elderly business and includes a lot of comorbidities in both cases. The young don't die in relevant numbers from Covid not vaxx. Image
3/ One thing that looks strange are the low death batches / weeks in many cases for the very old groups. It should follow an exponential life table to my view. There should be no points in the red circled area (high age, low deaths). Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(