📛Very concerning at #COP26: many attempts to push #falsesolutions in decision texts to set in stone distractions away from need for real action / fossil fuels phase out ...
Parties must resist these attempts in final hours of COP
See👇👇👇for specific refs
New ref. to scaling up CLEAN power generation: as intensive lobbying at EU level indicates, govs & biz have many ideas what this entails: nuclear, BECCS, gas...
this would be 1st ever ref to "clean" instead of "renewable" in a political UNFCCC decision (draft cover COP decision)
Weakening down of reference to phasing out of coal - suggesting that only "unabated" coal falls under scope of phase out = implicit support for CCS despite repeated failure (draft cover COP decision)...
Reference to net zero remains in draft text of cover decisions despite the alarming amount of evidence that many governments and big polluters are using net zero to delay policies / cover up absence of actions to phase out fossil fuels (in both draft CMA and COP decisions)
language on restoration of ecosystems improved over night with deletion of undefined "Nature Based Solutions" +new ref. to enviro & social safeguards-but reference to indigenous peoples rights shld also be included to prevent land grabs (in both draft CMA and COP cover decisions)
really concerning: very vague and open-ended language on removals in the decision on carbon trading / #Article6 - very nervous that this is an open door for the full Carbon Dioxide Removals technofixes (draft SBSTA conclusions on article 6.4)
in the context of the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism, a last ditch attempt to frame petroleum gas as a clean alternative to consumption of biomass... still in brackets (CMP decision on Guidance relating to the clean development mechanism)
#humanrights & climate risks associated with #Article6 decisions deserve separate thread (upcoming) but here is 1 example... there is no independent grievance mechanism to address any grievances which constitutes a breach of due process (draft decision on art6.4)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨 On day 1 of #COP29, 🇦🇿AZ Presidency seeks to speed up the endorsement of new standards on carbon markets. This is extremely alarming. If this moves forward, it would be a real cop-out by governmental delegations gathered in Baku.
An explanatory thread 🧵⬇️
2/🌰 𝐈𝐧 𝐚 𝐧𝐮𝐭𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐥: Weeks before #COP29, a technical body (the Article 6.4 Supervisory Body) pushed through 2 standards to operationalize & expand carbon markets, circumventing governmental authority + stepping out of its mandate.
🔗🇺🇳UN Doc: unfccc.int/documents/6426…
3/ ⚠️These standards also threaten the integrity of the Paris Agreement. The COP can either reject this approach or give it a green light. The latter would undermine the implementation of the Paris Agreement and create a dangerous precedent for future decision-making.
⚡️🚨⚖️ Starting in 10mins: historic moment on the path to #ClimateJustice: the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea 🧑⚖️🌊 will deliver the first international legal opinion spelling out States' legal obligations in the context of climate change #ITLOSAO
🧵A live thread ⬇️
2/🥜the context in a nutshell: after a robust drafting process informed by the input of 30+ States and many legal experts, the 21 Judges of the🧑⚖️ @ITLOS_TIDM will deliver today their advisory opinion in response to a request by Small Islands States gathered in the @COSIS_CCIL
3/🧑⚖️ This is the first out of three Advisory Opinions (authoritative legal statements) that international tribunals have been asked to deliver to clarify the extent of the existing legal obligations of States, under international law, related to combating climate change.
⚡️⚖️a few snapshots from the landmark #ClimateJustice decision delivered today by the 🇪🇺European Court of Human Rights in Klimaseniorinnen v. 🇨🇭Switzerland
🧵a short thread focusing on the scope of substantive obligations of States...⬇️
🆕🇪🇺while the European Court has a long track record of protecting environmental rights, today provided the first opportunity for the Court to consider the scope of States' existing obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights in the context of climate change...
... in fact this was the first case to be heard by an international human rights court on matters related to human rights and climate change.
Three cases have already been adjudicated by 🇺🇳UN human rights monitoring bodies but those are not judicial institutions.
🔥📢historic #ClimateJustice decisions upcoming today at European Court of #HumanRights
⚖️Today's decisions could shape #ClimateAction policies in all 46 🇪🇺European States & beyond
🧵A live thread on key stakes & takeaways from the Court's hearing taking place in Strasbourg⬇️
2/ Context: the ⚖️@ECHR_CEDH will deliver historic rulings in 3⃣ of the 9 climate cases currently pending before the Court.
🗺️These rulings are expected to serve as a blueprint for future decisions regarding the obligations of 46 European States with regards to climate action
@ECHR_CEDH 3/ today's cases
👵Verein Klimaseniorinnen v. Switzerland 🇨🇭
🚸Duarte Agostinho v. Portugal 🇵🇹& 31 other States
🌊Carême v. France 🇫🇷
But by addressing #HumanRights obligations of States re: climate emergency, the significance of these decisions go way beyond individual cases
⚡️⚖️🇺🇳starting now: diplomatic briefing on the submissions to the @CIJ_ICJ in the advisory proceedings related to States obligations in the context of climate change, hosted by 🇻🇺Vanuatu, 🇨🇷Costa Rica,🇵🇹Portugal & @CIEL_tweets
🧵key messages in thread below ⬇️
#ICJAO4Climate
2/ #ICJAO4Climate submissions briefing:
🎙️@joie_chowdhury of @CIEL_tweets opens the panel stressing the historic opportunity offered by these Advisory Proceedings but also the importance of written submissions to inform the work of the International Court of Justice 📝
@joie_chowdhury @ciel_tweets 3/ Amb. @Sumbuea of 🇻🇺Vanuatu stresses key role played by Pacific youth in initiating this groundbreaking initiative, reminds other diplomats of the importance of written submissions by March 22nd, emphasising importance of participation by States from all regions of the world
🔥A hot take on #COP28:
The #FossilFuels industry tried every trick to protect its interest:
📍hosting COP in a repressive country to tame dissent
🎩placing one of its CEO in charge of COP
🤑sending thousands of lobbyists
😡coordinating a last ditch defence through @OPEC
A🧵⬇️
2/ yet, even in this most favourable environment, the #FossilFuels industry & its governmental backers failed to prevent what people and most impacted countries demanded: a recognition of need to transition away from fossil fuels. There will be no turning back from here.
3/ But yes: the #COP28 outcome is appalling as #fossilfuels cheerleaders secured so many loopholes - intent on using these to justify their planet-wrecking plans for a continued expansion of fossil fuels extraction...