The NHS needs REFORMED.
Indeed, the NHS needs serious overhaul.
It is no longer providing world-class universal care [IMO].
It seems to not even be providing ‘value-for-money’ anymore.
But it is our money and our health, so we must have a say…
🧵1/n
RT pls.
The NHS once provided the most cost-effective healthcare of all developed nations. Indeed despite consistently spending the LOWEST percentage of GDP (national income) of similar nations (graph), up until the last couple of decades it still provided world-class outcomes.
In the 70s the UK had one of the lowest infant-mortality rates in the world. But by 2010 it looked like this (source BBC):
And why are there so many more managers?
As the NHS has been broken up into smaller pieces, the number of managers have increased substantially. Since 1999 the number of managers in the NHS have increased by 82%, while other staff by only 35% (Kings Fund).
While it would be simple to blame the NHS model of care and replace it, and this may be what is required, its important to ask what changed and what has caused the decline of the NHS. And it is this question we should be asking of our leaders?
Why is the NHS failing?
Certainly the redistribution of NHS resources to managers and contractors is unlikely to have helped. Almost one quarter (£26bn) of the NHS budget has been given to non-NHS providers and 14% is being spent on managers (vs. 5% in the 1980s). Less and less money for actual care.
Less beds:
Less doctors:
And why?
Because we are not pursuing a REFORM of our health service based on what is in the interest of the public. Instead it is being driven by what is good for those providing the service! And where is this leading….
..a diminished primary care service.
GPs have no income from the specialist care they refer to (at the moment), hence they will decide based on safety and efficacy. As such GPs are the gatekeepers and can be the most powerful force against more expensive care.
Instead of seeing a GP and them deciding what you need, automated systems (such as '111') are being implemented in the UK. These computer systems will decide who you will see and how urgently. The evidence strongly suggests these systems pose a significant risk to the public.
Chronic conditions are being neglected. Elderly care, mental health services, and acute care are all being diminished. If this continues we will spend twice as much on healthcare and achieve worse outcomes:
The reforming of the NHS is needed. But it must be open and transparent. Simply being disappointed and annoyed that the NHS is ‘no-longer working’ or has ‘too many managers’ IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH. These changes will affect us all and future generations.
In the ‘70s it would have been difficult to find a better health system - in terms of value for money and good health outcomes. The UK was then, in terms of healthcare provision, truly ‘world beating’.
Since 1980 the NHS has declined. Standards of care have improved, like most countries. Treatments have also improved. But timely access to such treatments have become increasingly poor.
It is telling that: 1. This 'reform' of the NHS is all being done covertly. 2. Many docs and nurses don’t want it - even though they will be paid MUCH better. 3. The public are not getting a say in what model of care they want.
You need to act now. Otherwise this is where we will end up:
And skint:
60% of bankruptcy in the US is due to healthcare costs.
I am sorry to put this on you. It is terrifying. And if almost feels like we have no power to change it. Really, those looking after the NHS and our MPs should be protecting us from such backdoor dealings. They aren’t. So we all must stand up for our right to choose.
We may choose a mixed-model of care, where private augments national health, or we may choose to renationalise, or something completely different. But it must be our choice and benefit the people.
So what to do…
Firstly, ask the questions to your MPs. Do they know what is going on? And if so, what are they doing about it?
Secondly, demand open and transparent reform. We want to contribute our opinions to what type of healthcare we will be paying for.
How complicit has NHS Leadership been in Johnson’s pandemic calamities? And have lessons been learned?
There is a long list of failures:
▪️Ageist policies
▪️Blanket Do Not Resuscitate orders
▪️Inadequate PPE
▪️Ethnic disparities on the frontline
▪️No Triage
▪️No clinical follow-up
▪️The ‘Stay Home’ messaging
▪️Ineffectual Contact and Trace
▪️Circumventing primary care
▪️Rationing of access to healthcare via ‘111’.
▪️Oxygen rationing
▪️Shrinking the NHS during a pandemic
And these failures, while still remediable, continue to place HCWs in unsafe and traumatic working conditions, and are still leading to unsafe care provision for the British public.
Where problems with care seem national, those of us actually delivering care can feel quite helpless to change it. Take the government’s pandemic policy...
We on the frontline are also victims, collateral damage, of ill-conceived healthcare policies.
But the GMC guidelines, while adding yet another responsibility on our shoulders, also provides the encouragement and compulsion to speak out.
“If you have reason to believe that patients are, or may be, at risk of death or serious harm for any reason, you should report your concern.. Do not delay doing so because you yourself are not in a position to put the matter right”
Firstly, you should use the same judgement as you did before the pandemic. Who would you normally contact if you are concerned about specific symptoms?
You may think you are saving healthcare resources, but waiting until you are worse neither helps you or the health service.
Secondly, if you test positive for COVID-19 and are either over 65 yrs old or have a condition that makes you clinically vulnerable you should contact your primary care provider (GP practice) to let them know you have Covid and request 'remote home monitoring'.
I fear we have not learned how to respond to a pandemic. Both clinical and public health responses in many nations have been chaotic, inconsistent and had disappointing results. So what would a decent response look like? Pls add your own… #Covid19
1. Early “circuit-breaker”.
Debate remains as to the justification for lockdowns. The argument being that lockdowns cause more damage to non-Covid problems than the lives saved from the virus. I think that depends on a few things:
a) Healthcare capacity
A new pathogen will lead to extra strain on health services. Unless the health systems in place had capacity prior to the pandemic, then the additional burden will impact all diseases. The UK is a good example of this. All cause mortality = +1400 per week.
I hear this question often: why didn’t all countries just lockdown for a month and extinguish COVID-19?
The principle is sound - a global response. Our leaders didn't try, it seems, due to the fear of economic instability.
Is it time then, for a new economic model?
1/6
Essential services adapted. Food networks were secured. People worked - often successfully - from home. Healthcare services utilised emerging technologies to maintain care. But, apart from printing more money, where were the intelligent economic solutions?
2/6
And it is not just about the Fat Cats needing the workers to get back to making them rich. Billions rely on daily earnings to survive. The rickshaw driver in India can’t afford the month off, nor can the piecemeal factory worker in England.
3/6
▪️How to tell if a Covid-19 patient is deteriorating at home?
A cross-discipline team reviews the signs and symptoms to watch for.
(1/10)
Share pls.
2/10
The majority of Covid-19 resolves without event. Typical symptoms are similar to the cold or flu and tend to start improving after two or three days.
3/10
The public should exercise the same judgement for who and when to contact if concerned as they did prior to the pandemic.
[The British Thoracic Society CAP guidelines remain unchanged.]