You might think that the oceans are just parts of the land that are covered with water. Actually, that's really not the point - the oceans are there because the rocks *below* the oceans are fundamentally different from those below continents - and it's all because of magma! 2/9
Below the crust, the mantle is convecting. This is driven by heat given off by radioactive delay deep inside the Earth.
The mantle is solid rock - but every now and then a pocket melts: due to the addition of water, release of pressure, or extra added heat. Magma! 3/9
Those little pockets of melt are where all the action happens. As the magma cools, certain minerals will crystallize over time - and depending on their density, will either float to the top, or sink to the bottom. 4/9
Over the billions of years of Earth's evolution, this process has filtered lighter elements upwards. These accumulate at the surface, and stay there - because they are too light to sink back down & convect.
The continents? Just ancient pond scum - up to 4 BILLION years old. 5/9
Oceanic crust is just a baby in a comparison - some literally forming today - like in the center of the Atlantic - getting progressively older as it moves away from the spreading ridges.
As it ages, it cools, gets denser, and eventually starts to sink back into the mantle. 6/9
Continental crust is low density and old. Oceanic crust is dense and young. And just like how icebergs have deep roots, continents do too - the extra mass above is balanced out by the lower mass of the root. This is the principle of ISOSTASY: equilibrium of crustal mass. 7/9
So that explains the double-peaked curve. But it still leaves one question: if the oceans aren't important to the curve, why the peak at sea level specifically?
Okay, so I lied. Of course the ocean are important. 8/9
The oceans don't cause the double peak, but they DO cause grading to sea level. Rocks at high elevations erode, are carried to the sea by rivers, and are deposited there. If the sea level rose or fell, the higher peak would follow. 9/9
Although the paper is framed around "earthquake forecasting," it's a prediction paper. They use the word prediction in both the paper and the supplement.
2/
This was reviewed through BSSA, and is being promoted by SSA.
Earthquake prediction, if it were proved, would be a BIG DEAL. The bar for passing review should be very high.
The 2002 Molise earthquakes occurred within ~1 day of each other (Oct 31 and Nov 1). The first quake collapsed a school, killing half the children inside (26 of 51). At the time, the area was considered to have no seismic hazard.
The school was built with reinforced concrete, but the second floor was added later, and it is possible that this made the building more susceptible to collapse.
3/
Several people have asked me recently about whether we should expect a large earthquake on the Afrin fault, south of the Feb 6 rupture.
First: no one can predict earthquakes, so if anyone has told you they can, they are wrong.
But let's take a look anyway.
1/
First, what is the Afrin fault? The AFEAD dataset has a small fault listed under this name, running through the city of Kilis, Turkey. An extension of this fault is mapped near the city of Afrin, Syria.
These faults are part of the northern end of the Dead Sea Fault.
2/
You can explore these faults yourself. The dataset describes the "Afrin fault" as having a slip rate of <1 mm/yr - i.e., not really detectable. But the extensions are a bit faster, maybe up to 5 mm/yr. The Dead Sea Fault slips ~5 mm/yr.
Why did a M5 earthquake occur HERE yesterday, in what is apparently the middle of the African Plate?
Answer: It's not the middle of the African Plate, it's the East African Rift: the continent is pulling apart at a rate of ~1-5 mm/yr.
1/
Yesterday's earthquake was just the latest in a long series of earthquakes - and not the largest, either; there was a M6 in 2020 to the south.
The "rift" isn't a single fault, but many.
2/
Volcanoes are scattered along the rift, too. As the crust thins, deeper areas experience lower stress, allowing "decompression melting" - hot rocks kept in a solid state by pressure will melt if that pressure is released.
A M6 earthquake occurred a few hours ago offshore Japan. Due to its magnitude & distance from shore, it was not damaging, but the setting is interesting to explore.
This is a subduction zone: the Pacific Plate is subducting below the Okhotsk Plate at a rate of ~9 cm/yr. The Okhotsk Plate used to be considered part of the North American Plate (even though it's in Japan!) but it actually moves slightly differently.
This is a very active place, seismically speaking. Today's earthquake occurred on the subduction interface fault (called a "megathrust" - i.e. a really big thrust fault). That megathrust has hosted many large earthquakes, including...
3/