How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App
The 2002 Molise earthquakes occurred within ~1 day of each other (Oct 31 and Nov 1). The first quake collapsed a school, killing half the children inside (26 of 51). At the time, the area was considered to have no seismic hazard.
Yesterday's earthquake was just the latest in a long series of earthquakes - and not the largest, either; there was a M6 in 2020 to the south.
https://twitter.com/USGSted/status/1640649541065261057
This is a subduction zone: the Pacific Plate is subducting below the Okhotsk Plate at a rate of ~9 cm/yr. The Okhotsk Plate used to be considered part of the North American Plate (even though it's in Japan!) but it actually moves slightly differently.
https://twitter.com/JudithGeology/status/1633100988600004609
It started on Feb. 23, with a M3.8. Then, a few days later, a little microseismicity.
https://twitter.com/JudithGeology/status/1636337534316736512This plot has 4 parts:
This is how earthquake early warning works.

There are occasional spikes in the data - in the monthly data, the March 2011 Tohoku-Oki M9.1 earthquake creates a spike because of its many aftershocks.
https://twitter.com/USGSted/status/1638225245499985920
The two earthquakes in areas with subucting slabs oriented in opposite directions. The rainbow lines above represent the depth to the plate interface (red = shallow, blue = deep).
https://twitter.com/JudithGeology/status/1629337705531297793The authors of the new paper ("A fault-based probabilistic seismic hazard model for Lebanon, controlling parameters and hazard levels") noticed that in Lebanon, many more events are recorded during the day than at night.

This aspect of the seismicity has been known for some time - the deeper earthquakes here are not on that shallow fault system, but rather an inferred boundary between two parts of the subducting slab.
In the map above, I've excluded the primary area of the recent rupture; what you're seeing is earthquakes recorded since 1900. Before ~1975, only large (M>5) earthquakes were recorded. Since then, seismic detection has been progressively improved.
It is true that this area has complex faults across a wide area. Personally, I am not so concerned about the labels - the important thing is which faults slipped, and how much.
Aftershocks here are distributed across an area ~40 km x 50 km - we're not just looking at the main E-W fault, but at least two extra faults extending NW-SE and N-S down from the tip of the rupture. All of these faults have produced aftershocks.
https://twitter.com/JudithGeology/status/1637202564109287424
There have been many other earthquakes of M6.8+ in the broad area, but not so many at this depth - they are generally either shallower or deeper - and none specifically recorded near the latest epicenter.
https://twitter.com/USGSted/status/1637143976103870465The reported depth of the quake is ~65-70 km, which pretty closely matches the plate boundary fault. However, the focal mechanism shows that the quake does not represent slip along the plate boundary, but instead is likely caused by breaking of the sinking plate.
The aftershocks are largely located within the fault zone, not near Gaziantep, Kilis, or other cities to the east.
https://twitter.com/WeAreSeismica/status/1635609274004152320Authors choose every word carefully so it says exactly what they mean; technical words have precise meanings, and each one may refer to a whole field knowledge.
The central part of the M7.8 (~Gaziantep) is pretty quiet now, and Hatay has only moderate seismicity.
This is the earthquake record near Adana. I had to scale down the aftershocks to show it - they are small compared to to the recorded events!