This letter seems to misunderstand the Met's role. It's not @PeteWishart's job to gather the evidence. He doesn't have power to compel the production of documents and interview witnesses. That's the Met's job. So why won't they look? 
It's hard to think how you might read a piece like this and think to yourself 'nah, nothing here to investigate'. Surely, you'd at least take a look.
Once again, we are left wondering whether political interference with policing means the Tories are above the law.
Once again, we are left wondering whether political interference with policing means the Tories are above the law.
It's just like PPE procurement. Everyone knows - with huge payments to politically connected middlemen - there is at least a whiff of out-and-out corruption. And yet the police are nowhere to be seen.
I'm going to keep tweeting this story - where we have gathered and published evidence from multiple sources - involving No. 10 and Priti Patel and which is fishier than Grimsby Docks on a Monday morning but which PC Plod is remarkably sanguine about. goodlawproject.org/update/patel-m…
Disappointing too that our vaunted media - which ignored* the VIP lane when we published leaked documents - chooses soft targets like second jobs than going after what has many of the hallmarks of fraud. Brave or spineless?
*Picked up, first, by @DavidRoseUK of the Mail.
*Picked up, first, by @DavidRoseUK of the Mail.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
