We need to unite behind a clear, forceful message. First: This is not just an attack on books. It's an attack on kids. It's an attack on schools. It's an effort to paint teachers and librarians as "the enemy."
Second: ALL of our kids belong in public schools. ALL of our kids deserve to find themselves in the books they seek out in libraries. ALL of our kids have parents whose "rights" matter, not just white, straight kids.
Third: Students--especially those with the identities represented in the books under attack- have faced unprecedented challenges through the pandemic, and these garbage games from the right are diverting essential school resources from the work of getting kids back on track.
Fourth: School leaders need to calmly follow existing policies for content review (including the curricular value of diverse lit) instead of opening libraries to attack by folks who don't read but do want to erase history, progress, and the very existence of non-dominant people.
Now, these points are already too nuanced for circulation as wide or fast as the shriek, "There's porn in the schools!" That's why we need more advocates, including PROACTIVE messaging to school leaders and SBs before demands for book removals come to them.
The condensed, diplomatic version of this position is this: "Let's focus on ALL students, not just these parents' kids. What response to these parents' concerns protects the interests of all students and supports the diversity of perspectives that is foundational to democracy?"
We don't react to shrieks of, "PORN!" "PEDOPHILIA!" "FILTH!" We focus on a positive message about students and the positive role of school libraries in providing support for navigating the complex realities of our world. We say, "Wouldn't we rather kids read than watch TikTok?"
Students benefit from thoughtful engagements with the issues and experiences that matter to them. When they are denied access to books that do this, they resort to unmonitored access to less reputable sources--the Internet, locker room, SnapChat. Books serve them better.
And, there is dark $ behind what is being painted as spontaneous parent concern, $ for everything from burdensome info requests that verge on harassment of school admin staff, to bounties on teachers and librarians, to bankrolling lawsuits
For those following the Leander ISD book bans: removals/decision to keep did not correspond with the review outcome--what is the explanation, @LeanderISD?
Spreadsheets here, bottom right corner: leanderisd.org/communitycurri…
Sample screenshots follow in thread... @jzfriedman
Title:
Did you read it?
Description of the book (in your own words):
One positive theme in the book:
What conversations are possible because of book?
Your primary concern:
How do passages of concern relate to book as a whole?
I think what is key is to frame parental concerns about book contents as the beginning of a conversation, not the end of one.
@r_bittner@AdvInCensorship@ncacensorship We can model how to contextualize passages that might seem objectionable; we can offer similar examples from "classic" texts; we can provide resources that help parents see the opportunity to talk to their kids about issues because of the book.
I appreciate so many folks offering solidarity & reading what @andrewkarre & @veronikellymars & others have to say about book bans. That, AND...
Teachers, librarians, principals, students, school board members: they are the ones most in the crosshairs of this awful moment.
Let's talk about the 20 (or more?) sane voices expressing gratitude for youth access to rich, relevant varied literature that it will take to match the impact and reach 1 hysterical adult's decontextualized claims about a novel in the school library.
If you don't know what's happening in your school board meetings, find out right now. This circus may be coming to a fairground near you--or maybe you're in the thick of it.
The folks attacking the literature in schools have a playbook, talking points, reservoirs of outrage.
yeah, right? Tons of bawdy humor and penis jokes and rape-y vibes and downright rape. I mean, I believe we can teach it all without harming kids, but I'm really sick of that stuff being held up as "educational". WTF, man.
Today, this week... in conversations about why books that are compelling to teens belong in libraries, there has been so much basic misunderstanding of what the hell literature is, what the hell education is. And the level of mistrust of teachers & librarians is staggering.
And then we're defending, again and again, the importance of rich, relevant, diverse youth literatures--the world-opening it offers to ALL young people--against the charge that this reading is unnecessary, profane, or low-quality.
Long thread here, in response to messages to the effect that my books are “disgusting”...
PS: This is the same content as in the previous thread, except now it's
(a) accessible
and
(b) less annoying because there's no clicking on images.
Learning, y'all!
As an author, former Texas HS English teacher, professor, mom, and human, I try hard to take seriously what folks say, even where I disagree.
I work to assume that, even under personal attacks, there is some wish for meaningful dialogue.
I am a Texan. I care about Texans, our kids, our histories, our future.
I understand the cultural climate, pressures, and perspectives that can prime folks to react to material that challenges their understanding of the past and what they’d like to believe about the present.