Oh my god. I had an epiphany about TENET and something about how it works and how to look at the entire movie clicked in my brain and now I absolutely love it.
This isn’t something I can explain in a tweet but a good place to start is this video by @BenChinapen .
A couple of tips: 1. Anyone reversed already knows what’s happened. 2. During the plane crash scene, there are three Protagonists, not two.
I’m looking at this movie like Primer from now on. Multiple watching slowly holding more of the entire story in my head until everything just works. I’m almost there with this.
If I had to sum up my epiphany, it would be that TENET accurately describes how a paradoxical scenario would work. Inevitably a time machine would lead to a closed loop of equilibrium like a standing wave. Causality breaks down and events are doomed to always happen the same way.
It's a war to prevent something that never happens because the people fighting the war knows how it ends. That's a paradox because the information has to have an origin, but Nolan basically says "let's say say this *did* happen - what would it look like?"
I gotta say now that I figured out what he's doing, I have to give him respect for being as pretentious and gutsy as he was to take $200 million and make something this impenetrable that requires multiple watches. I actually drew a diagram tonight just to make sure I got it lol
OK here's another tip. For a normal time flow observer, if someone goes from forward to reverse in the turnstile, then two of them walk in and none appear to come out. If someone goes from reverse to forward, two of them come out when none appeared to have walked in.
I promise that one you get this switch flipped it will start to make sense. A person traveling in reverse who walks into a turnstile will then move forward in time alongside his own self that just travelled backwards, so there are now two of them at the same time.
ADDENDUM: The YouTuber Welby CoffeeSpill created 3D animations that show you the three main confusing sequences in the movie in both time flow directions.
Car chase:
Oslo airport sequence:
Stalsk-12 battle:
One last post where again I tried to kinda clarify the main obstacle to understanding this movie - the scenarios in it are impossible according to our understanding of time. Once you're able to step outside of that, you'll get it.
Unironically yes. In a world where a machine like this existed, there's always a chance that you will turn out to be your own grandfather.
In closing, I don't think the obstacle to this movie is intelligence. Trust me, you're not "too dumb" to get it. It's more about experience. You're more apt to get it if you've spent time watching or reading or thinking about time travel theories and paradoxes.
/END ꓷИƎ\
PS: I'm not proselytizing or saying that you're wrong or dumb if you think the movie is bad or boring or doesn't make sense. I'm relaying my own lightbulb moment and how I went from thinking this was fine but overly confusing to really appreciating it on many different levels. 🤷♂️
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In the coming collectivist dystopian future, the only type of permitted individualism will be minor cosmetic alterations to your government-issued NFT avatar.
My NFT hot take is that the second an NFT is part of a series or collection, it ceases to be nonfungible, even if market forces assign arbitrarily different values to them. At the end of the day, any two beanie babies are interchangeable unless you're a beanie baby collector.
A quarter that's 100 years old will get more money at a coin auction than a quarter from last year. That doesn't make quarters nonfungible. Someone willing to pay more for one over the other doesn't determine fungibility.
I agree that Biden backtracked to correct himself as I see him do it a lot. But contrasted with the exceedingly bad faith pileup on the Rittenhouse judge for something that was *clearly* a supply chain joke solely because he isn't hostile to the defense validates the complaints.
I seriously cannot highlight enough that people think the judge is biased because *he isn't as mad as they are at Rittenhouse*
A judge should be as angry as Twitter or else he's not impartial. That's where we're at.
The lack of a racial component or a sympathetic victim to highlight means they need some other way to keep fueling anger-driven clicks and ratings. So playing the "fixed fight" angle with regards to guns and Trump and white supremacy is all they have left.
He's an alumni who donated hundreds of thousands of dollars and priceless personal items to the school and gave it international publicity. Yes, rejecting his fundraising because a few students complained is the most cancel culture thing I can think of.
Shooting a movie in full frame 1.43:1 IMAX is a conscious choice that involves most people not seeing it like that. Even most IMAX theaters don't have those screens and putting it on a TV zooms the image out so unless your screen is huge, it's kinda unimpressive looking.
Disney+ using Enhanced IMAX 1.90:1 rather than full 1.43:1 is still bringing the 2.39:1 Anamorphic cut of the movie that most people saw in theaters and is the one on home releases closer to 1.43:1 without sacrificing the size of the images on screen. It's the smarter choice.
And for the people traumatized by pan and scan and full frame movies - they aren't cropping the anamorphic cut. They are adding the additional material they originally shot to the anamorphic cut. It's an additive aspect ratio change, not a subtractive one. You're getting more.
How do you do, fellow confederates? Just me, racist confederate with an extremely new-looking confederate flag patch in a very normal place on my jacket at a Glenn Youngkin rally, who is also a racist pro-confederate.
Also not how extremely hidden their identity is. Big hats. Shot conveniently from behind with zero identifying features. The sussiest sus that ever sussed.