Paul Poast Profile picture
Nov 14, 2021 39 tweets 12 min read Read on X
How did the Gold Standard work? I mean ACTUALLY work?

The answer reveals a lot...including why a Gold Standard won't work today.

[THREAD] Image
When I write "actually" worked, I am not looking for an explanation based on the "specie flow mechanism", IS-LM-BP model, or something abstract like that Image
Instead, I want to know, for example, if governments actually loaded gold onto boats to move gold from country to country! Image
Important to note that there are different types of Gold Standards:

- coin: literally 🪙 circulated
- bullion: govts hold gold bars, which are redeemed with paper currency by anyone
- exchange: govt holds currency that can be exchanged for gold
eh.net/encyclopedia/g…
The most recent Gold Standard system, the one that Nixon ended in 1971, was of the third type (why he ended it is another story for another thread). Let's focus on understanding how that system worked!
That system, the Bretton Woods system, was based on the "Articles of Agreement" signed in 1944

Link: fraser.stlouisfed.org/files/docs/his… Image
We refer to the system established by the "Articles of Agreement" as the "Bretton Woods System" because the articles were negotiated and signed at the Mount Washington resort in Bretton Woods, NY Image
According to Article IV of the agreement, US $ was the "exchange currency" that other countries could use to acquire gold (and against which other countries would set the "par values" of their currencies) Image
Specifically, governments of other countries could buy gold from the United States at $35 per ounce.

Important note: the price of gold wasn't set in the Articles of Agreement. It was set by the US 1934 Gold Act

Link: fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/gold-res… Image
Not worth going into all of the details for WHY the Articles of Agreement were written this way. For more on that, see @BennSteil's excellent book
amazon.com/Battle-Bretton…
Suffice it to say that the key reason the $ and gold were the foundations of the system was because, by 1944, the US held most of the world's gold Image
Here's a key: under the Bretton Woods system, only other governments could directly exchange dollars for gold from the US government.

There were private gold markets, but only governments could use the US "Gold Window" Image
Before a government can acquire gold from the US, it first needs $. How did it acquire those?

Turns out, most governments DIDN'T have them. This was called the "dollar shortage" and was due to many of the economies of the world being devastated by WWII Image
But programs such as the Marshall Plan, large US military spending during the 1950s, as well as the US allowing imports of goods abroad with few exports going out (i.e. tolerating protectionism), enabled other countries to start accumulating dollars. Image
By the late 1950s, enough countries had enough $ that the "Bretton Woods system" could actually start working
federalreservehistory.org/essays/bretton…
Okay, now that we know what the Bretton Woods system was, let's get to the key part of the thread: how did a foreign government ACTUALLY acquire gold held by the US?
A foreign government, say France, would make a request directly to the US Treasury. This request usually went to the US Treasury's International Affairs department.
home.treasury.gov/about/offices/…
For a good portion of the time that the Bretton Woods system actually operated, the head of that Treasury division was Paul Volcker (yep, THAT Paul Volcker!) ImageImage
That request would then get kicked over to the Treasury's Exchange Stabilization Fund
home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/…
The folks working at the ESF then call up the Federal Reserve Bank of New York Image
You see, the NY Fed is the "fiscal agent" of the US Treasury
newyorkfed.org/aboutthefed/fe…
More precisely, the Treasure request goes to the Fed's foreign exchange operations desk
newyorkfed.org/markets/intern…
For most of the Bretton Woods system's operation, that desk was headed by Charles Coombs. Coombs wrote about his experience in this book
amazon.com/Arena-Internat…
Once the Fed has the order from France to exchange dollars to gold, the order is processed by moving the gold. Literally. Image
But the gold USUALLY did not physically leave the US...or even the Fed.

The image that opened this thread is of a "crib". The Federal Reserve bank of New York has a bunch of these cribs. Image
Countries from around the world have their own "cribs". These countries leave the gold (usually for a small handling fee) in those cribs. Why? convenience Image
Side note: some folks might be thinking, "wait, wasn't that the basis of the plot to `Diehard with a Vengeance'"? Yep!
In sum, US $ have now been converted to gold, but the gold is still in the US.

At least, that's how it usually worked. Sometimes countries wanted to actually ship the gold back.
Shipping the gold back is what France did during the 1960s, which is when the Banque de France accumulated much of the physical gold that it holds today.
banque-france.fr/en/custody-and…
Why did France do that during the 1960s? Ask, Charles De Gaulle.
Another caveat: sometimes the Federal Reserve Bank of New York doesn't have enough gold on hand to meet the requested transaction. In that case, the gold is shipped from the US Bullion Depository, a.k.a. Fort Knox Image
One final caveat: sometimes the request for gold can be made by governments IN PERSON. That apparently is what the British did in 1971, when their ambassador (George Baring) literally walked over to the Treasury on August 12 to put in the order to convert dollars to gold Image
So why does all of the above suggest that such a system won't work today?

On the one hand, governments still seek out gold, from time to time, as a form of security during uncertain times
forbes.com/sites/greatspe…
On the other hand, the whole system "worked" because governments and people agreed (one could even say, pretended) to make it work. But that could be shut down at any time.
For instance, on August 2, 1971, Nixon's Secretary of the Treasury, said that the US "can stop convertibility very easily...by just saying no"

history.state.gov/historicaldocu…
That points to the problem with a gold standard system. Like ANY international arrangement, there is no way to enforce it.

Cooperation under anarchy...it's hard
cambridge.org/core/journals/…
So for anyone out there who wants to return to the gold standard, it's important to recognize that the thing is NOT automatic (no specie-flow). It requires a LOT of states (and people within states) to act cooperatively and follow "the rules of the game".

[END]
Addendum 1: As some have noted, I meant "NH" not "NY" for the location of Bretton Woods. 🤦‍♂️
Addendum 2: For more on Nixon's decision to end Bretton Woods (this year is the 50th anniversary), see 👇

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Poast

Paul Poast Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfPaulPoast

May 11
Should everyone have nuclear weapons?

That's the core question in the Waltz-Sagan debate

[THREAD] Image
In my latest @WPReview thread, I wrote about another debate: whether nuclear weapons actually deter.
worldpoliticsreview.com/nuclear-weapon…
I pointed out the difficulties in answering that question, namely that we don't actually know when deterrence works (i.e. selection bias)...
tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
Read 22 tweets
May 4
Does the United States have a responsibility to protect the civilians of Gaza?

[THREAD] Image
In my latest @WPReview column, I wrote of the downfall of "Responsibility to Protect" or R2P.

worldpoliticsreview.com/us-foreign-pol…
R2P is "the responsibility to protect its populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity". This means nations can't hide behind the barrier of "sovereignty" to stop interventions.

un.org/en/genocidepre…
Read 22 tweets
Apr 21
The House passed a defense supplement for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan.

Ukraine aid was the most controversial portion of the supplement and might cost Speaker Johnson his leadership position.

Why did he do it?

[THREAD] Image
As is being reported, Johnson stated “To put it bluntly, I would rather send bullets to Ukraine than American boys. My son is going to begin in the Naval Academy this fall....This is not a game, this is not a joke.”
cnn.com/2024/04/21/pol…
While it's partly personal for Johnson, his remarks emphasize a larger point, one that I raised in a recent @WPReview column: cutting off US aid won't end the war. Instead, it would embolden Russia.
worldpoliticsreview.com/us-ukraine-aid…
Read 19 tweets
Apr 20
Let's do this.

A close reading of Donald Trump's recent description of the Battle of Gettysburg.

TL, DR: there were no pirates.

[THREAD] Image
ICYMI, here is a clip of what Trump said about the Battle of Gettysburg at his recent Pennsylvania rally

Let's start at the beginning:

"The Union was saved by the immortal heroes at Gettysburg"
Read 30 tweets
Apr 14
Are we on the brink of a larger Middle East War?

The risk increased in the past day, but is still low.

[SHORT THREAD]
Many of the points raised in 👇 🧵 from October still apply: larger wars happen because states want to be drawn in.

Is that still the case?
This @goodauth piece from October made related points about the tools states -- specifically Iran and Israel -- can use to control escalation.

goodauthority.org/news/will-the-…
Read 9 tweets
Apr 13
"International law is fake law."

"The only real law is domestic law."

Both statements are wrong. In some sense, the opposite might be true.

[THREAD] Image
As I wrote recently in @WPReview, international law is flawed. But flawed shouldn't be confused with pointless.

worldpoliticsreview.com/war-gaza-inter…
I emphasized how international law is part of a broader diplomatic process where states try to convey their preferences over policy.

In other words, from signing a treaty to filing a ICJ dispute, international law provides information.

journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(