Darren Naish Profile picture
14 Nov, 29 tweets, 12 min read
Time once more for a #TetZoocryptomegathread. Again, it’s on #seamonsters, and again on a supposed actual photo of a live one! I refer of course to the enigmatic Professor Sharpe ‘1908’ photo, which I first wrote about back in 2008…
The photo was brought to recent attention by cryptozoological researchers Dwight Smith and Gary Mangiacopra in a 2001 article, published in a special volume of Crypto devoted to aquatic #monsters...
It concerns a photo that’s been republished more than once since its first appearance in a Californian newspaper, and must have been seen by thousands, if not millions, of people… #cryptozoology #monsters
The photograph was ‘rediscovered’ in 1980 by Gary Mangiacopra – a researcher well known for his many investigations of unidentified aquatic animals – while he was looking through old newspaper archives....
Featured in a 1908 article from the San Francisco Examiner entitled ‘To Catch a Sea Serpent’, the photo extends across two pages and depicts an elongate, two-humped creature in the water…
The caption explains that the photo – described as “the first photograph of a sea serpent” – was ‘taken by Prof. Sharpe from the steam yacht Emerald as the monster rushed past at 20 miles an hour’ (here are the relevant pages from Smith & Mangiacopra’s article) …
The photo was published again in The American Weekly on New Year’s Eve 1933 in an article that was apparently inspired by the recent rash of #Caddy sightings from British Columbia, and of course by the publicity surrounding #LochNess
This 1933 outing of the photo – shown here – differed from the 1908 version in being longer, and in showing the start of what appears to be a third hump far to the right of the frame.... #seamonster #cryptozoology
.... Another outing of the photo was in 1944 when it appeared in an American Weekly article on monster sightings from Idaho’s Payette Lake. This time Sharpe was described as Professor B. A. Sharpe…
Smith & Mangiacopra (2001) reproduced the images and discussed them in their article. They were unable to get any information on the images at all from the San Francisco Examiner (which was still going when Mangiacopra started his investigations in 1981)…
As they described, the object in the photo looks like a long, cylindrical creature with a dark dorsal and light ventral surface. A triangular object at left could be a head or a fin. Foam or spray appears at the right end of each hump, creating the impression of rapid movement…
Is this image a fake? Prof. George Zug (a herpetologist at the Smithsonian who has often commented on cryptozoological data) opined that an object at the far left of the first hump looks like a rope, and he suspected for other reasons that the photo was a fake…
Smith & Mangiacopra agreed with this, but still wondered whether “It is a genuine, overlooked cryptid photograph that was seen on three occasions and by tens-of-millions [sic] of readers who did not realize its significance?”…
They ended by noting that, even if it is nothing more than a hoax, it’s the oldest known existing photo claiming to depict a sea-serpent...
In my 2008 article, I was under the impression that nothing was known of Prof. B. A Sharpe, or of the yacht Emerald, nor is it known where the photo was taken, how big the ‘animal’ was, or when the photo was taken…
But waitaminute... isn’t ‘Prof B. A. Sharpe’ the famous ornithologist Richard Bowdler Sharpe (1847-1909) of the British Museum of Natural History? Sharpe is well known for his ornithological works, among which are catalogues of the birds owned by the BMNH during the late 1800s...
Sharpe also has also several bird species named after him, including Sharpe’s apalis, Sharpe’s starling and Sharpe’s longclaw (art by K. G. Keulemans, of course)… #birds #birdart
Are we really saying, then, that a famous and well-known zoologist photographed an actual real sea serpent? Smith & Mangiacopra had no clue who Sharpe was, noting in their conclusions that they’d been unable to work out who he was...
They assumed he was American and noted that efforts to find such an individual in “early 20th century editions of American Men of Science” had been unsuccessful. It would be exciting if Sharpe HAD photographed a sea-serpent, but read on…
Inspired by my 2008 article, Loren Coleman @CryptoLoren looked into the ‘Prof Sharpe sea serpent’ case himself. He found that Smith & Mangiacopra didn’t show the ‘first’ outings of the photo at all. It had actually been published in April 1906 in the Illustrated London News…
Here, it was noted as “a curious creature” seen “between Madeira and St Thomas”. Madeira is in the Azores and St Thomas is in the Caribbean, so the photo was taken somewhere in the North Atlantic. It hadn’t first appeared in US publications in 1908, but in British ones in 1906…
... (note the little decorative Daedalus sea monsters round the edges). And especially important is that the original photo looks very different from the American versions we saw earlier…
It shows a single hump! And, whatever it shows, it doesn’t look especially remarkable: it’s probably the back of a whale (presumably a rorqual). It could be a rorqual with a damaged dorsal fin. Or...
.... could it be that the triangular eminence at far left is the raised ‘splashguard’ around the blowhole? Whatever, there isn’t any reason here to think that we might be seeing an unknown species… (Biscay Fin whale photo by Alex Srdic)...
We therefore have to conclude that those photos showing two and even three humps are cheaty modifications of the original, made by duplicating the first hump to make a whale into a sea serpent...
This negates previous suggestions (made by John Conway and others back in 2008) that the object might have been painted onto an original photo, something that always seems problematic in view of how ‘correct’ the sea spray and wave action looked relative to the hump…
And that’s about it! Another alleged sea monster image bites the dust, dammit. The original #TetZoo article on this case is here: web.archive.org/web/2012091503… #seamonsters #cryptozoology
Here’s your reminder that I’ve published a good list of these #TetZoocryptomegathread things now, follow the # for more. There are plans to compile them for a book or something! #cryptozoology #monsters
Update: upthread, I meant to say 'But waitaminute... _could_ ‘Prof B. A. Sharpe’ be the famous ornithologist Richard Bowdler Sharpe'? This needs looking into, it could be totally wrong.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Darren Naish

Darren Naish Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TetZoo

10 Aug
At long last, it’s time for another #TetZoocryptomegathread, wherein I look in detail at a piece of photographic evidence said to show a MONSTER. This time, we’re looking again at a #LochNessMonster photo, specifically the HUGH GRAY PHOTO of 1933.... #LochNess #cryptozoology
This photo - famously hard to interpret - is the very first photo claimed to show the Loch Ness Monster! And I’ll mostly be calling it the Gray Nessie photo. To business…
As per usual, please remember that this isn’t called a megathread for nothin. It’s loooooong. Secondly, I am an ‘honest sceptic’. I am not biased, and I aim to report authentically what authors and reporters have said, on both sides of the proverbial fence... #cryptozoology
Read 139 tweets
6 Jun
Time for a #TetZoocryptomegathread! This time we look at one of the most famous sea monster accounts: the WWI incident in which the crew of the U-boat U-28 witnessed a gigantic, crocodile-shaped monster get blasted out of the water by an explosion. Yes, you read that right…
The U-28 incident is generally considered one of the most amazing and exciting claimed sea monster observations, combining the drama and historical realism of marine warfare with a remarkable creature account that defies belief… #cryptozoology #monsters
As usual with these megathreads, please remember that I discuss both the ‘pros’ and ‘cons’ of these sorts of stories. If you read something that seems wrong, silly or illogical, remember that I’ll very likely be coming back to it later on in the thread. Ok…
Read 96 tweets
24 May
You might be wondering why I haven’t produced a #TetZoocryptomegathread for a while. There's a reason for this: I’m working on a grand and vast megathread project, to be revealed in time. But for now, let’s talk about the #YETI, and about one key sighting in particular…
You probably have the impression that the #Yeti is a ‘reasonable’ cryptid: that the case for its existence is backed up by the relatively remote and wild location it’s associated with... #cryptozoology
.... by the anatomically and behaviourally ‘reasonable’ nature of the alleged sightings, and by the quality of those alleged sightings (art @thejohnconway and John Francis/Usborne/Miller 1977)… #yetis #cryptozoology
Read 68 tweets
8 Apr
By now about a million of you have shared the 'a surprising number of sea serpents were whale penises' thing. It's good, it's all good, but I have some comments... (brief thread)..
Firstly, the hypothesis (which was published by the excellent Charles Paxton @CharlesPaxton4 and colleagues in 2005) was suggested to explain one specific sea monster account (Hans Egede's 1734 sighting off Greenland)... (cont)
... with one additional encounter - the Pauline sighting of 1875, made off the coast of Brazil - also suggested as a whale wang sighting...
Read 9 tweets
4 Mar
You might have heard the news about photos claimed to show LIVE #THYLACINES. Inspired, I’m here going to discuss other alleged LIVING #THYLACINE photos. Yes, it’s another #TetZoocryptomegathread, wherein I take a detailed look at #cryptozoology-themed photographic evidence...
This time round, it’s the turn of the Kevin Cameron photos of November 1984, taken in south-west Western Australia and said to show a live #thylacine...
#Thylacines, as you surely know, are not supposed to be living on the Australian mainland in modern times and are also supposed to have gone extinct sometime around 1936…
Read 128 tweets
14 Feb
After an long hiatus caused by a ridiculous workload, it’s time for another #TetZoocryptomegathread, in which I examine the backstory to a cryptozoological photo or bit of film. This time, we look at the Lake Dakataua ‘Migo’ monster footage of 1994. Warning: LONG thread ahead…
I’ll tell you now that this case is complex. It involves crocodile systematics and behaviour, the ‘surviving archaeocete’ hypothesis, mosasaur life appearance as depicted in #palaeoart, and the world of the pre-internet cryptozoological community…
What is the #Migo?... I hear (some of) you cry. Also known as the Masali or Migaua, it’s an alleged mystery creature of New Britain’s Lake Dakataua, said to be about 4m long, and to be a flippered, long-tailed, long-snouted, aquatic, predatory animal…
Read 174 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(