It's estimated that ~1% of the world's population eats at McDonald's every day.
McDonald's best lever to influence purchase decisions is the menu, which the $190B fast-food chain designs with many psychological hacks to boost sales.
Here are 10 of them 🧵
1/ In the mid-2010s, McDonald's sales were lagging. The brand turned around its fortunes with a multi-year menu & store redesign that:
◻️emphasized simplicity (speeding up avg. drive thru time from 400 secs to 350 secs)
◻️highlights signature items (pricier = higher margins)
2/ Here is McDonald's challenge: loyal customers love the classics (Big Mac, McChicken).
And they spend only 30 secs on the menu (getting them off default options is hard).
But McDonald's sells 2B+ meals a month, so influencing choices for a small % of customers boosts profits.
3/ Attention cues
Dynamic menus were the biggest change. While value items are typically static pics, signature items are animated.
Our peripheral vision specializes in detecting motion. Dynamic signature items capture our attention and end up in our potential choice set.
4/ Decision anchoring
First options are key in decision-making. In a study of buffets, 70% of eaters put one of the first 3 items on the plate.
Signature items are often the 1st thing you see. By highlighting them, they are nudging the higher-margin items into your choice set.
5/ Optimized for working memory
Cognitively, humans can hold 5-9 "items" in our working memory at one time (e.g., 7-digit phone numbers).
McDonald's dynamic menus highlight 7-10 items. Naturally, the majority of the menu real estate emphasizes higher-margin items or combos.
6/ Price anchoring
Even if *none* of the signature item nudges work, we've been exposed to the priciest items on McDonald's menu.
A subsequent purchase from regular (or value) menu will seem like more of a deal based on the price difference...leading to the perception of value.
7/ The power of grouping images
Gestalt principles describe how humans perceive objects and one of them is pattern matching.
McDonald's often groups 3 similar images together of a single product category (usually Signatures) to create a "pattern" that captures our attention.
8/ Health halo
Studies show that menus with healthy food items actually end up pushing people to eat junk food.
Why? The healthy images raise the "health index" of an entire choice set, giving us permission to indulge.
Naturally, McDonald's includes such images on its menu.
9/ Experience chunking
Inside the restaurant, McDonald's separated the order and waiting lines.
The key here is that our perception of "waiting" is reduced vs. if it was a single line. Thus, our memory of the experience is that the wait "wasn't too long".
10/ Self-order kiosks
You've probably used one. While the joke is that McDonald's is making us work, the kiosks are *def* effective at making us spend.
How? We don't feel pressure/anxiety of ordering in line. Instead, we take time and fully customize (=spend more) on the order.
11/ The logo
This isn't part of the redesign but worth flagging: the colors in McDonald's logo are very strategic.
We see color before words and images. And many fast food chains use red, which evokes urgency and desire.
(Research suggests it raise blood pressure/appetites).
12/ If you enjoyed that, I write threads breaking down tech and business 1-2x a week.
Def follow @TrungTPhan to catch them in your feed.
If you are the person that did the un-aligned letters for the previous eBay logo, please contact the research app team. We are huge fans of how un-aligned the “e” is with the “y”.Bearly.AI
This article offers up reasons for popularity of simple font logos (mostly Sans Serif):
— Easier to standardize ads across mediums
— Improves readability (especially on mobile)
— The “brand” matters more than the logo velvetshark.com/why-do-brands-…
Berkshire Hathaway board member Chris Davis once asked Charlie Munger why Costco didn’t drop the membership card.
Let anyone shop and raise prices by 2% (still great value), thus making up for lost membership fees (and more).
Munger said the card is important filter:
▫️“Think about who you’re keeping out [with a membership card]. Think about the cohort that won’t give you their license and their ID and get their picture taken.
Or they aren’t organized enough to do it, or they can’t do the math to realize [the value]…that cohort will have a 100% of your shoplifters and a 100% of your thieves. Now, it’ll also have most of your small tickets.
And that cohort relative to the US population will probably be shrinking as a % of GDP relative to the people that can do the math [on Costco’s value].”▫️
I have a membership but have been guffing on the math for a few years tbh. They keep telling me to upgrade from Gold to Business but I’m too lazy (even if the 2-3% Cash Back on Business pays back after a few trips).
This is a long way of saying Costco’s membership price hike effective today — its first in 7 years — is annoying but when I decide to do the math in a few months, it’ll be worth it.
Anyway, here is something I wrote about Costco’s $9B+ clothing business my affinity for Kirkland-branded socks and Puma gym shirts. readtrung.com/p/costcos-9b-c…
Two notes:
▫️Meant “Executive” (not “Business”) membership
▫️Chris Davis was doing a pure thought experiment. Costco membership obvi high margin (on~$5B a year) and accounts for majority of Costco profits. Retail margin is tiny on ~$230B of annual sales (Costco would need like another $150B+ from letting anyone shop to make up membership profits)
One of the Team USA rowers who won a Gold Medal is an investment banker and actually did the “B2B SaaS Sales” joke on Linkedin. Legend.
Here’s the rest of the post (perfectly formatted to show up in the feed as a shitpost): linkedin.com/feed/update/ur…
Justin if you’re reading this and are available for consulting, the research app team would love to engage your B2B SaaS knowledge for our Q4 sales roadmapBearly.AI
The amount of work Hayao Miyazaki and Studio Ghibli team put into a film is mind-boggling.
Each typically has 60k-70k frames, all hand-drawn and painted with water color.
This 4-second clip (“The Wind Rises”) took one animator 15 months to do. Insane.
The docu “10 Years with Hayao Miyazaki” shows him talking to the animator (Eiji Yamamori) after its done.
It’s so good:
Miyazaki: “Good job.”
Yamamori: “It’s so short, though”
Miyazaki: “But it was worth it.”
The animator gets a second of joy (he’s pumped) but on to the next.
Miyazaki doesn’t use digital FX or computer graphics. He believes “that the tool of an animator is the pencil.”
On a related note, here’s something I wrote about another Japanese legend dedicated to the craft (Ichiro Suzuki) and the art of mastery: readtrung.com/p/jerry-seinfe…
New York City paid Mckinsey $4m to conduct a feasibility study on whether trash bins are better than leaving garbage on the street.
The deck is 95-slides long and titled “The Future of Trash”.
Some highlights:
▫️The official term is “containerization”, which is the “storage of waste in sealed, rodent-proof receptacles rather than in plastic bags placed directly on the curb.”
▫️Two main types of containerization: 1) individual bins for low density locales; 2) shared containers for high-density.
▫️NYC needs to clean up 24,000,000lbs of garbage a day
▫️Containerization has only become the norm worldwide in major cities in the past 15 years.
▫️New York City first considered containerization in the 1970s but never conducted a feasibility study until now (Mckinsey’s sales team has been dropping the ball)
▫️Key considerations for container viability:
• POPULATION DENSITY: NYC has 30k residents per square mile (more dense than comparable big cities)
• BUILT ENVIRONMENT: Few places to “hide” containers due to history of infrastructure development.
• WEATHER: Snow creates challenges for “mechanized collection” in the winter.
• CURB SPACE: Mostly taken up by bus stops, bike lanes, outdoor dining and fire hydrants.
• COLLECTION FREQUENCY: NYC needs to double frequency of pick-up for estimated speed of trash that bins would accumulate.
• FLEET: A new garbage truck will needs to be designed to collect rolling bins at scale.
▫️ The proposed solution (literally garbage bins and shared containers) covers 89% of NYC streets and 77% of residential tonnage.
▫️The three case studies — because you gotta have solid case studies — are Amsterdam, Paris and Barcelona.
▫️There is a slide called “Why containerization matters” and three reasons are “rats”, “pedestrian obstruction” and “dirty streets” (the 21-year intern that did this slide billed at prob $10k an hour is my hero).
The study is actually pretty interesting.
I have no idea if $4m is a rip-off to learn that “yeah, we should put garbage in bins so rats don’t eat it” but I would have happily done it for 10-20% of that budget (and come to a similar conclusion).
It is actually an interesting deck. Just the thought of a 20-year old newly grad getting billed at an obscene rate to say”rats get to garbage” is kinda funny
Four more solid slides:
— By the numbers (daily garbage = 140 Statue of Liberty a day!!)
— City comparison
— Container comparison (looks like they did select the “scalable” trash bin)
— Curb side analysis
Think Mckinsey telling NY to “put garbage in bins so rats don’t eat it and people can walk” will work out better than when it told AT&T in 1981 that cellphones would be “niche.”