Yes! A 1859 NYT editorial scolding abolitionists as unreasonable and doing harm to the cause of opposing slavery is a fascinating read, especially the part where they say “silence on the part of the north concerning slavery would be the best policy”
“The very best thing that could possibly be done towards the abolition of Slavery would be for the North to stop talking about it.”
“Ten years of absolute silence would do more than fifty of turmoil and hostility, towards a peaceful removal of the evil. It is quite possible that the Abolition crusade may force a bloody and violent termination of the system, but this no sane man desires”
“The great necessity is to let the South alone—to leave them leisure to think of their own affairs—to throw upon them the necessity of studying their own condition & of looking into their own future…Emancipation whenever it comes, must be the work of the Slave States themselves”
worth noting NYT's "go home, shut up and let the adults handle reform" posture was also popular during civil rights movement. Just a month into the Freedom Rides, NYT insisted the rides had achieved everything they were going to achieve and for activists to pack it up and go home
NYT editorial June 4 1961:

"as we have urged before, the Freedom Riders should realize they have made their point and voluntarily cease their activities for a period during which the passions aroused by their recent efforts may subside"
"A similar position on this issue was taken last week by the Southern Regional Council, which is composed of both white and Negro liberals. The Council is entirely correct in advocating that the advantages gained be not pressed too far."
"The issue of desegregation can ultimately be solved only in the South and primarily by Southerners, white and Negro. Neither violence nor the steadily insistent provocation of violence can bring about the solution"
Despite the NYTimes plea to stop (and pressure from the Kennedy White House on May 24 1961 to do the same) the Freedom Rides would continue for six more months.
The guiding principle behind the NYT editorial board advocacy for 150 years is to let Serious, Credentialed legislators and lawyers handle the fight for equality and, above all, not upset or agitate whites. To them what's most important is peace, and stability and gradual change.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam H. Johnson

Adam H. Johnson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @adamjohnsonNYC

16 Nov
See I think this where there’s confusion. That Americans did radical and righteous things being rammed into some Essential American narrative is often times simply ahistoric. The IWW built a foundation of labor progress but explicitly rejected nationalism. Where do they fit in?
Are the Black Panthers part of some American fiber? Runaway slaves who justifiably sided w/ British in War of 1812? Labor radicals who disrupted supply chains during WWI? Some movements used the banner of Americanism but many explicitly did not. Just convey this reality imo
Retconning all progressive movements into some preordained American Way is a self serving tautology that views the people who occupied the relevant space of North America as, by definition, part of some coherent political project which is goofy kid shit.
Read 9 tweets
16 Nov
This shit is so insecure. Insisting the US is ultimately Good & Moral, no matter how nuanced & handwringing one may be about “mistakes,” is so transparently political & about soothing egos it’s weird we have to act like this has anything to do w/ fidelity to historical precision
Let’s all just admit it’s about political utility & social cohesion & ameliorating the cognitive dissonance inherent in running a liberal empire that supposedly promotes human rights & democracy while bombing & propping up dictators and not, at all, about proper historiography
Again, there are dozens of countries on earth who don’t tell themselves exceptionalist fairy tales and their citizens get along his just fine! The sun doesn’t have to rise and set in our ass, truly
Read 8 tweets
15 Nov
Bail reform in NY was already very watered down, now supposed Rational and Reasonable Reformer Eric Adams wants to basically kill it. Remember: this is about caging humans for months, sometimes years, before they’ve even had a trial, much less been found guilty of anything.
Again, BLM & abolitionists were scolded time & again during the campaign by the Serious People at the NYT and MSNBC that Adams was going to “balance” “real reform” w/ “safety”. Other than cosmetic changes in leadership: what actual reforms has Adams proposed since he was elected?
Proposals Adams has made since primary win:

✔️ Ending school mask mandate
✔️ Bringing back “jump out boys” NYPD unit that was shelved in 2020 because it harassed and killed so many black people
✔️ Teaching “crypto in schools”
✔️ Hiring more police officers

❓ “Police Reforms”❓
Read 6 tweets
14 Nov
Democrats were THIS CLOSE to backing meaningful “police reform” (whatever that means, body cams for the body cams? banning chokeholds for the fourth time?) but those meddling defund kids messed it. Otherwise it would have absolutely been a real thing that would have happened
8cantwait were a series of “requirements” state and city lawmakers would insist police departments would suggest to police they abide by. Several of which were already on the books for years and no one ever followed already
Theres a sophisticated perma-reform regime of PR firms, partisan hack think tanks & nonprofit limited hangouts specifically set up to waterdown reform efforts thats been around for decades & it’d be good if the “defund is too far” crowd would at least try & engage w/ this reality
Read 6 tweets
12 Nov
This is such a smart gambit by Hawley, just the perfect superficially appealing fake bullshit. Here, white rural communities aren’t suffering because private equity firms like the one Hawley used to be a lawyer for gutted jobs, but due to vague moral failings
The problem is a moral one not a material one, its origins are immigrants, academics, feminists, gays, the Chinese & the wokes not the interior rich & petty bourgeois owners who fund Hawley’s campaign & whose interests he serves & who drive down your wages & gut your labor laws
Self help Christian woo woo is smart, it speaks to a genuine human need and fills a real void but offers warmed over MRA dogma mixed with capital-serving victim blaming
Read 4 tweets
11 Nov
Theft and property crimes are not a moral failing but the product of poverty & widespread social failures and I’m not “defending” it (whatever that means) I’m criticizing reporters and editors doubling as vigilantes targeting a population that is, by definition, unhoused and poor
The US is BY FAR the most criminalized nation in earth. We make up 5% of the world’s population but 24% of its incarcerated population. If arresting people prevented crimes the US would have the lowest crime rate among rich nations but it has one of the highest.
Maybe, for the love of god, we can think of another way to solve theft and property crime than demanding, as these reporters are, more cops arrest more homeless people? Huh? Maybe? Maybe we can think a little outside the fucking box on this one??
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(