Sometimes, singing in tight vocal harmony, certain chords locked just right will produce a hair-raising effect: the air buzzes, the sound gets "fuller," goosebumps, psychosomatic tears. I think it comes from overtone overlaps? Sharing rabbit hole and questions so far:
Unfortunately, it's hard to convey this effect with a recording—it's much stronger if you're producing it. So I guess I'm mostly talking to other vocalists.

The first key bit seems to be that voices can sing in just intonation, i.e. whole number ratios: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_into…
(I'm totally skipping explanation of overtones, temperament, and the harmonic series here… for a wonderful intro, see @vihartvihart's )
In four-part harmony, singing the harmonic series 1, 3, 4, 5 can produce one form of this effect: i.e. the tonic, and its major triad in second inversion an above.

e.g. this (remarkable) cadence resolves to that disposition in A major (A E A C#): Tingly!
I think it feels tingly because of all the overtone interactions between those whole numbers. The bass's overtones reinforce all the other fundamentals; then there'll be strong overlaps at 12, 15, 20, etc.
In my experience, this effect is much stronger when singing with less vibrato and quite a bright timbre (i.e. more upper overtones!). I hadn't really understood this—I sing mostly contemporary pop—but barbershop stylistic choices are mostly in pursuit of this effect.
They lean heavily on dominant sevenths, which (tuned in just temperament) are the 4, 5, 6, and 7th harmonics of a root two octaves down. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_… Lots of interesting overtone interactions create an angelic "fifth voice" singing high above! "Ringing chords".
How do inversions/dispositions influence the effect?

eg If the Notre Dame cadence resolved to root triad instead of second inv above bass: 1, 2, 5/2, 3 instead of 1, 3, 4, 5. That'd emphasize a root-fifth interaction, which might detract from the sus resolution of the third.
I experience something like this effect with close dissonant chords, too, which barbershop eschews. What's going on there?

e.g. in Eric Whitacre's music, there are lots of so-called "fist chords". These sometimes produce the effect for me too! Why? Overtones aren't very aligned.
Why is this effect so much stronger for the singer than for the listener?

There's something in being the *causer*, but it's also physical: when the effect occurs, It feels like my voice, my chest, the air in my lungs, my muscles, all resonate with the room and the other singers.
Why is this physical sensation so powerful?

It feels almost overwhelming sometimes! Like being given over to a "higher power" for a moment. It's beautiful, moving… and a little eerie. Why do we respond this way? Odd!

"Sense and Sensation in Barbershop": jstor.org.sci-hub.se/stable/41700111
Goofy question I've been noodling with: it's not easy for an amateur to produce this effect—so could one design a simple cybernetic exhibit to give an untrained person the experience of causing this with their voice? I have a few ideas…
This feels like a dumb question, but: why don't we notice *destructive* interference more in vocal harmony? This figure shows constructive interference in a harmonic seventh chord—but that assumes everyone's in phase! Which… they won't be, right? Do we instinctively auto-align?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andy Matuschak

Andy Matuschak Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @andy_matuschak

5 Nov
Discussing this more with Laura, one thing that surprises me is how few digital authoring envs you'd want to "live in" all day for both prose and visual explanations. Your team can live in Notion, but then no visual expls; or live in Figma, but probably not write there.
OneNote was the only full-featured tool we could think of which seemed well-suited to both text and visual explanations, though it has its own downsides.

We're all still "separating by mode of production", per Tufte…
Yes, one can still embed Figma artboards as blocks inside Notion documents, but that's still separating by mode of production. Means you're unlikely to spontaneously create text<>visual interactions as you'd naturally do on paper / whiteboard.
Read 5 tweets
25 Oct
"Export considered harmful"

Because software rarely operate on "files in folders" anymore, "export" is increasingly the way software exposes data. But usually you don't want a dead snapshot; you want to "use this data elsewhere"—which requires repeatedly exporting & reconciling.
Say I make an app for annotating papers. An old-fashioned way to do this would be to make a desktop app which views PDF files and writes annotations into the file. Now Spotlight can see them; Zotero can display them; etc. But SaaS must "import" the PDF and "export" annotations.
But "export annotations" is not the same as "save annotations" because now if I add more annotations to the PDF, I must export them again, and then reconcile that new export with whatever downstream tools used the old data. This gets much worse in the bi-directional case!
Read 11 tweets
22 Oct
Really exciting talk from @JoelChan86 demonstrates an interface for incrementally generating semi-formal "discourse graphs" (X supports Y, Z informs W) through naturalistic note-taking structures:

The loose structure and incrementalism seem really key!
I've been creating these sorts of relationships informally in my own note-writing processes, and it's been really interesting to see synthesis (sometimes) emerge from the noise.

Not yet sure how useful formal structures ("discourse graphs") are, vs. relatively simple queries.
Probably more formal and machine-readable structures are essential if one aspires to network this work across many scholars, as Joel does.
Read 5 tweets
11 Oct
One fun way to think about extended cognition is in terms of creating unrecognizably alien mental states.

eg: someone who has never used Hindu-Arabic numerals can't imagine what is going on in the mind of someone using them to solve a problem. Unrecognizably alien mental states!
Ditto musical notation: someone who's never used it can't imagine what's going on in the mind of a composer who has.

But also, Lisp does this to how I think about representing data; drum machines do this to how I think about rhythm; probably a Bloomberg terminal qualifies; etc.
In general, the more transformative the environment, the more unrecognizable—alien; magic!—the mental states it produces.
Read 5 tweets
11 Oct
Following up: several people mentioned the original 1987 Apple Human Interface Guidelines, which I'd not read. It's not a comprehensive primer on interface design, but it is an extraordinary read—a huge amount of detail on *why* things are as they are. And a great bibliography!
It's surprisingly difficult to find a PDF of the 1987 edition online, so here you go: andymatuschak.org/files/papers/A…
If you've only read "modern" HIGs, I definitely recommend reading the 1987 edition! It's *very* different. It is amusingly difficult to imagine this passage in a contemporary Apple text.
Read 5 tweets
9 Oct
Have been experimenting with this unusual Dasung portable e-ink display for park working sessions. It's surprisingly responsive—plenty good enough for writing, coding, studying. HDMI driven, weighs about 1.5lbs, sits in front of my normal display (& uses much less power, ofc).
Working on the reMarkable is pretty nice, but it makes me feel so passive. The device makes it so hard to write while I read, to jump around, to synthesize—I'd rather use paper most of the time.
Part of the trouble, I guess, is that this use case is too niche to get a really thoroughly-developed software stack. So things like the Kindle, reMarkable, Boox etc feel awfully "unserious" about workflows compared to my laptop. It's nice to just use my "full" setup in the park.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(