This isn't a critique of policy that either understands environmentalism, draws away from its excesses, understands its rise, or proposes a meaningful energy policy. He'd be quite happy with NetZero if it hadn't created an opportunity for him.

breitbart.com/europe/2021/11…
Since he calls it 'net stupid'... "Hydrogen" is a stupid idea. As stupid as anything in Net Zero, which indeed it is a part of. SMRs are all well and good, but hardly answer the problem for the next decade or so.
"We will invest in brilliant shiny new world-class super-duper fab technology".

Cool. Like what?
Oh, and tidal power.

He wants to have his cake and eat it.

Seriously, it's lame.
"We can do this in a sensible, affordable, proportionate way".

Do what? Why? How?

It's Tory-Lite. That's all.
"I love solar panels".

Useless.
He thinks that all the problems of the green agenda go away if you make the solar panels and wind turbines in the UK.

No, you just make them even more expensive.
Opportunism, but no more.
It's like when Nigel Thunberg did his tree thing. "I've always been an environmentalist", he said.

Well... That's never been a good thing.
Ultimately, Xi's answer to Tice is going to be, "So where are you going to get the neodymium from, Richard?"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ben Pile

Ben Pile Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @clim8resistance

15 Nov
Greens are weird and mad.

They exist because society failed to confront the ideology festering in the recesses of its increasingly undemocratic institutions.
They are going to get madder and weirder and more and more dangerous until society choses to confront environmentalism, or green ideology causes a deep political, social, and economic crisis.
What do I mean by crisis?

Listen to the protesters. They're demanding not just Net Zero, but actual zero by 2030.

There is no rational perspective being brought to UNFCCC negotiations, and even less to green ideology. It is, so to speak, a positive-feedback mechanism.
Read 19 tweets
14 Nov
James vewy vewy cwoss wiv China and India... You know, nearly half the world.
The green determination to spin the event as 'historic' is equal to their desire to call it a massive flop.

I love a good contradiction, me.
What was historic?

As far as I can tell, it is the inclusion of the word 'coal' in the text of the COP26 that has the greens so excited.

It is the substance they have fetishised most.
Read 4 tweets
13 Nov
This idiot has not contemplated the possibility that the problem experienced in Kenya is not climate change-related.

Which is likely to have the consequence of making life harder for Kenyans, as the following charts demonstrate...
These charts were used in a #FLOP26 episode the other night.

Clearly, there no climate change signal in agricultural production statistics from Kenya. ImageImageImage
(I chose fruit production, because it was highlighted by a Kenyan delegate at COP26.)
Read 6 tweets
13 Nov
If you think you can make a distinction between the green agenda and sleaze -- in any form -- you have not been watching.

Just ask the billionaire-funded @guardian, or the billionaire-funded green movement.

theguardian.com/society/2021/n…
There is no zero-sleaze green agenda.

The green movement is lubricated by and built on sleaze.
Even the party opposite the likes of Yeo, Gummer and Goldsmith is a party of red princes, blobbers and scandals. And between them, Huhne, and Davey, who got a nice job with the PR firm managing the account for "the most expensive power station in the world" that he commissioned.
Read 4 tweets
13 Nov
Madder and madder and madder and madder and madder...

I half hope he does it, so it will lay bare the absolute disjuncture between the UN & its auxiliaries -- including the little army of little green ideologues -- and reality.
"They hope that an emergency declaration would result in resources and technical expertise being rushed to countries most at risk from global heating...".

The UN has a poor track record in this regard.

People want futures for them & their children, not eco-warrior colonialists.
"Hello, we are from the UN, and we have brought solar panels."

"We don't want your solar panels. We wanted to build a proper power station."

"Well, you can't have one. It's bad for the planet."

"Ok, then get back on your helicopter and fuck off."
Read 8 tweets
13 Nov
Ed Miliband has always been LARPing at politics.

And that's what the climate thing is about. Its players live entirely virtual existences, remote and disconnected from the lives lived by billions of ordinary people.
Why does Ed want to be the climate champion so badly? Why does he think he has a handle on what the world needs?

Because he's a complete stranger to democracy. He's from a class of people who believe society is theirs to manage and engineer, no matter what people think.
He grew up in wealth, but with the belief that he was good for the world and could make it a better place without requiring the consent of those whose lives his ideas would affect. It's a left-wing version of Divine Right.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(