I've been looking up a lot of soup recipes lately.
Now, the way that I learn things is to avoid committing a bunch of seemingly unrelated stuff to memory by coming up with a framework that connects all the pieces together.
I give you: A Framework for Vegetable Soup
1/
STEP 1: Choose two vegetables.
I have no idea why it's two, but I can confirm that "garden soup" where you blend several together tastes gross to me so let's just accept the Magic Number Two for now
STEP 2: Chop up your two vegetables and sautee them until soft in a truly decadent amount of butter and probably some garlic.
Every single recipe appears to call for butter and garlic. I do not know why. I'm just recording an aggregate observation of the recipes here.
3/
STEP 3: Add caramelized onions and spices. Every recipe calls for a different laundry list of spices.
I'm never gonna remember this, so I figure:
Pick 1 spice that seems like it'd go w the veggies
Pick 3 more that seem like they go with the first spice
Use those 4.
4/
STEP 4: Put the cooked vegetables in a blender and then pour in chicken (or veggie, probably) broth until they're covered. Blend until lumpy but liquefied.
I actually DO know why this step is like this: blending doesn't work on raw veggies or without immersing in liquid.
5/
STEP 5: Put the lumpy liquid back on the stove and mix in cheese or cream.
This doesn't go for EVERY recipe, but I can't find a pattern to which ones do/don't do it, so: if this sounds like a thing you want, I guess, do it.
Evidently mixing continuously is important here.
6/
STEP 6: CHELSEA'S PERSONAL STEP NOT FROM THE RECIPES
This is where I add texture to soup because I need that in there for it to feel like food. Stuff I've used for this: rice, egg noodles, chopped up tofu, quinoa and kale, riced cauliflower, black beans, whole peas.
7/
STEP 7: Garnish with more cream, or chives, or crispy onion strings.
Again, no clarity on which of these to use on what, so do what feels right. The exception: black bean soup recipes usually call for crushed up tortilla chips as the garnish.
8/
That's it! Veggie soup in seven steps. Use this framework to your heart's content and let me know what did or did not work for you.
Happy soup season!
9/9
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The TV equivalent of french fries, the not-exactly-satisfying-but-momentarily-deicious stack of cable TV tropes in a trenchcoat that I've threaded the daylights out of on its queer representation: Lucifer
Note: I'm skipping "Green Box Credit" as a motivation. That's an extrinsic motivation created by employers in lieu of actual instructive hiring criterion, and its optimization is a 24h cron with an empty commit script to a public repo.
We're not counting that.
Onward.
2/
The next motivation for OS contribution is to learn.
Couple things about this one.
1. Code bootcamps and whatnot LOVE to recommend this to BEGINNERS, and it's one of the worst ideas I've heard these places consistently parrot. Here's why:
3/
As any infosec person will tell you, a company's greatest security vulnerability is its people.
So I was shocked that, in 2 years of WFH, tech largely ignored meeting security—despite the fact that many techies are cohabiting partners with employees of competitors.
Like,
/1
...sure, partners talk, of course.
But it's a little different to be having a Zoom about something, and the verbatim conversation is wafting through a set of speakers with a competitor literally sitting in the room.
But yesterday, I realized why companies aren't worried.
/2
My co-presenter and I stopped in a coffee shop. A few tables over, two young men were talking. LOUDLY.
I, and presumably anyone else in that coffee shop, now know:
- How their company's payroll is secured
- What software it's in
- The NAME of the person with blanket access
/3
Due to a series of airline mishaps I’ve been at MDW since crack of dawn. I usually fly out of ORD.
I realize my sample size is 1, but this is striking: I’ve overheard more casual homophobia in this one visit to MDW than in seven years of flying out of ORD. Like, combined.
Wtf?
I’m also not sure why it’s so trendy to hate ORD.
It’s a GIANT intl airport. I can count on my fingers the number of U.S. airports that face the logistical challenges that ORD does.
And, you don’t want to hear this: given what those challenges are, ORD does pretty good.