The misinformation propaganda over reservations by influential privileged-caste persons has reached comical depths. This warrants a short 'Explain Like I'm 5' primer on the philosophy of reservations, esp for decent UC folks who are indeed receptive to learning more.
Many anti-reservation polemic commentaries totally neglect to mention the primary goal of any affirmative action policy: proportionate representation of, & distribution of resources to, the different groups & communities which form a society.
Of course there was no great need for humans, esp once they ostensibly had become a 'civilized species' (or 'dharmic'?), to have such artificial divisions among themselves. But the socially dominant ppl & groups in the past did create these divisions, & here we are.
In the context of the Indian subcontinent such ppl were those who divided the society into varnas and jatis (now better known by the single term of 'caste'). These r centuries-old concepts, & have been with us forever.
Cut to 1947 and independence: some of the saner founders of the nation knew that the dominance of the historically privileged castes was SO inherent to & institutionalized in our society, that only a radical policy of representation could help undermine that brutal dominance.
This policy was what we know as reservations. The 1950 reservations policy recognized chiefly the sociopolitical underrepresentation of Dalits & Adivasis, and the 1980s policy recognized that of many other Bahujans ("OBCs")
It is thus this dominance and control by UC groups of socioeconomic capital and privilege, and the ensuing lack to inadequacy of representation of all other groups and communities, which the reservations policy primarily addresses.
So if in 2021 some privileged-caste ppl r saying that they have had "enough" of reservations, the least they can do is show us that the disproportionate dominance & control of capital and resources in India by UC groups has been vanquished..
... The least they can show us is that UC leaders & influencers are working hard to rid the society of casteism, of the persistent ideas of purity & pollution, of caste-based violence & atrocities, & also working to make our biased 'system' punish those indulging in such violence
And when they talk about numbers and statistics, the least they can do is tell the people of India what proportion of our population is UC, & what percentage of resources r controlled by them at present. #CasteCensus
But there's hardly any serious discussion of these aspects in their polemic commentaries. This makes their critiques less about justice & equality, & more about holding on to their historical caste-based privilege under the cloak of 'merit'
Of course societies are dynamic & undergo many kinds of changes all the time. Thus a policy like reservations which chiefly depends upon ensuring proper representation to different social groups, can certainly be fine-tuned with time
But instead of civilly working with DBA activists to discuss & deliberate such issues, most UC commentators r intent on scrapping reservations entirely or tinkering with them permanently - and take us back to the very state of affairs which created the prob in the 1st place
Intelligent critiques of reservations, like those of thinkers like Anand Teltumbde, do exist, It's sad that these r neglected in favor of divisive and dehumanizing polemics by UC influencers, like those of two TV presenters most recently
I have not discussed in this thread many other relevant concepts, like caste privilege, institutional and structural casteism, casteism in non-Hindu communities, as well as the many absurdities in the mainstream understanding of "merit."
Will do that some other time, but there's also a lot of material out there if one looks around with an open eye and mind. For now will end with one last aspect which is quite imp: talking about reservations with kids & the young
One of the most problematic things that many adult UCs do is to misinform their kids about the reservations policy & to inculcate in them a militant attitude against this legislation & against their dalit bahujan adivasi peers.
This is coupled with an equally callous lack of instruction on the realities of casteism in contemporary India, and an honest assessment of the brutal history of caste & caste-based discrimination and atrocities perpetrated by UC groups
Kids and the young can often be convinced of something if it makes sense to innate human principles like justice and equality. But these kids do not even get a chance to appreciate why reservations as a policy was needed in the first place.
I have seen my own ideas of so many things, incl reservations, change & improve over time. If young ppl r exposed less to hateful rhetoric & more to compassionate, intelligent, humane analyses, positive changes in mindsets r possible.
It is up to decent UC persons to work on effecting such changes. And DBAs to help them in that when possible. Besides, for self-learning, BR Ambedkar's entire corpus of literature is always out there for you. ccnmtl.columbia.edu/projects/mmt/a…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Many kinds of events r commemorated over social media now. I'd like to invoke this phenomenon & remind ppl of quite a consequential day for healthcare in India. On 13 Nov 1995, the Supreme Court ruled that medical services were indeed covered by the Consumer Protection Act (CPA)
CPA (1986) was a progressive legislation intended to provide people with simpler, more convenient mechanisms (as against courts of law) to demand accountability from those who unethically sold defective goods or provided deficient services.
Soon, ppl began demanding accountability from biomedical doctors & hospitals. The earliest cases wer in Kerala. One of the penalized hospitals went to the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission arguing that doctors & medical services did not, & should not, come under CPA
Our timelines hav been occupied by many awful things over the past few days (and for a long time before that of course). A common theme that runs thru all that awfulness, is the smallness and pettiness of the Sanghi mind
One aspect of this was described well by @OmairTAhmad here. As a Maharashtrian frm Konkan, where sanghi mindsets abound, I can say with certainty that this is exactly the modus operandi of the larger sangh parivar, however much they harp about "seva" & all
I remember, as a kid, overhearing some ppl not being happy with the romance scenes between SRK & Madhuri Dixit in DTPH. While I had no clue about it then, now I understand that they were furious at a "pure" Brahmin woman like Dixit frolicking with a Muslim man.
Unfortunate to see the example of a single postgraduate degree in a single subject in only two institutions out of several hundred, being used to erase/overlook the historical underrepresentation of oppressed caste communities in the medical profession and in medical specialties
All the more unfortunate when one notes that alternative avenues for the same degree are available more to "open" category students than to OBC, SC, ST students. The former, in general with a few exceptions, have far more resources and the "right" contacts compared to the latter
That is, an avg Brahmin or Kayastha student will far more easily be able to access the degree in another institution, even a foreign one. After graduation that doc will, compared to eg a Dalit or Adivasi doc, face far less obstacles in starting practice or gettin a well-payin job
Seeing how a lot of ppl, incl famous senior doctors & ppl from other fields, r whole-heartedly parroting sarkari claims on the Digital Health ID, one is reminded of Varun Grover's apt phrase for us - "gullible type"
Ppl in New India hav truly becom such gullible type! They r so nonchalantly trusting the fairy tales of the same ppl who said Demonetisation will help the economy "in the long run", Aadhar is "optional", and that Covid "war" will be won in 18 days like the Mahabharat..
Remember how everyone & their papa tweeted oodles and oodles of "thanks" to modi for demonetisation, calling it revolutionary and all - and then neither these celebrities nor modi himself has ever mentioned how exactly it helped ordinary indians
This is re. the apparent enthusiasm of some doctors for the Union govt's Digital Health ID project. I learnt about this enthusiasm from ppl's responses to @SonaliVaid's tweet yday, including the unfortunate trolling.
It seems that many doctors, when thinking about larger public health issues, simply extrapolate from their narrow clinical experiences, rather than taking into account social, economical, political factors. That is, the larger universe beyond the hospital.
Eg, some of the comments were like, Without digitisation, how can we manage records of our increasing population? This kind of concern seems to stem from what all of us doctors have experienced: patients often losing or not possessing imp paper records
The content of a recent judgment by the Allahabad HC is just another instance of how a lot of "proud" Hindus lack critical thinking skills, or what we call logic and commonsense in ordinary parlance. This lack of logic is not new, and resistance to it also is not new.
One influential Indian who rallied against such juvenile, ignorant ways of thinking prevalent among grown-up Hindus, especially when it comes to history, was Ramkrishna Bhandarkar.
He was a towering scholar who has left behind a huge corpus of work in Sanskrit studies, and in the history and culture of India. Pune’s prestigious Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute was founded as a tribute to him in 1917 on his 80th birthday.