This is re. the apparent enthusiasm of some doctors for the Union govt's Digital Health ID project. I learnt about this enthusiasm from ppl's responses to @SonaliVaid's tweet yday, including the unfortunate trolling.
It seems that many doctors, when thinking about larger public health issues, simply extrapolate from their narrow clinical experiences, rather than taking into account social, economical, political factors. That is, the larger universe beyond the hospital.
Eg, some of the comments were like, Without digitisation, how can we manage records of our increasing population? This kind of concern seems to stem from what all of us doctors have experienced: patients often losing or not possessing imp paper records
Sure, as a doctor one can provide, on average, more efficient (i wont say "better") care with such digital record-keeping.
But why do we think the only/best way to achieve that = a hasty "National" ID, with a billion records placed at a single central (& leaky) database?
That is, ther r many ways to digitize select health records, by learning from best practices around the globe, rather than following the bhakt practices of blindly trusting everything the Indian govt claims. Have we learnt nothin in 7 years? (thats more than MBBS duration btw)
Plus, what evidence do we have that the Union govt machinery even has the capacity and will to manage digital records (& provide Internet services) in a way that will be actively useful to practitioners? Not to mention the data breaches and corruption which will inevitably ensue
More importantly, how many of our patients have actively demanded a digital ID? As against affordable medicines and surgery, or clean and regular water supply? Or respectful, non-yelling care?
When there r so many other grassroots demands pending, what gives the medical & political elite the right to create a completely new and artificial demand for a billion ppl? That too simply on the basis of what they seem to like, irrespective of its relative usefulness.
Besides, when the Union govt wanted to displace blame for Covid to non-bjp states, it constantly harped on how health is a state subject. Is that no longer d case? Have ALL state govts in India demanded a single "national" digital ID?
If one critiques this digitization obsession by mentioning the other more urgent, pending healthcare demands, many supporters say that a digital ID will help in solving most of these other public health issues. That is perhaps the most absurd argument.
What evidence do we have for that? Are there any other countries which have achieved stellar public health & individual health outcomes because they embarked on Digital Missions? What about the better states like KL & TN? Does their experience show that Digital IDs are essential?
Is there a well-reasoned, logical, non-fantastical set of arguments which can plausibly connect digital health IDs to, say, reduced child mortality, or increased healthy life expectancy, or reduced diabetes incidence?
Doesn't Occam's razor suggest that there are much simpler explanations for this govt's obsession with digitisation? Like crony capitalism and scary surveillance?
Basically, as long as we dont develop a digital ID which will also magically create money on the side for the poor ppl who will be forced to carry it, no major public health issue is gonna be solved. Such claims r just खयाली पुलाव, or हवा में तीर
To put it in other words, the Indian govt's so-called Digital Health Mission will be as effective in improving people's health as demonetisation was in eradicating corruption and Aarogya Setu was in keeping Covid in check.
My request to docs is to start reading more and expand their horizons. It provides such fresh perspectives. Healthcare is vast, and biomedical management is only one part of it (often only a small part).
[Excerpt from Lock & Nguyen's 'An Anthropology of Biomedicine.']
For answers to some of the good questions which some decent folks asked on this thread, do read this. And also, without fail, follow @roadscholarz
Seeing how a lot of ppl, incl famous senior doctors & ppl from other fields, r whole-heartedly parroting sarkari claims on the Digital Health ID, one is reminded of Varun Grover's apt phrase for us - "gullible type"
Ppl in New India hav truly becom such gullible type! They r so nonchalantly trusting the fairy tales of the same ppl who said Demonetisation will help the economy "in the long run", Aadhar is "optional", and that Covid "war" will be won in 18 days like the Mahabharat..
Remember how everyone & their papa tweeted oodles and oodles of "thanks" to modi for demonetisation, calling it revolutionary and all - and then neither these celebrities nor modi himself has ever mentioned how exactly it helped ordinary indians
The content of a recent judgment by the Allahabad HC is just another instance of how a lot of "proud" Hindus lack critical thinking skills, or what we call logic and commonsense in ordinary parlance. This lack of logic is not new, and resistance to it also is not new.
One influential Indian who rallied against such juvenile, ignorant ways of thinking prevalent among grown-up Hindus, especially when it comes to history, was Ramkrishna Bhandarkar.
He was a towering scholar who has left behind a huge corpus of work in Sanskrit studies, and in the history and culture of India. Pune’s prestigious Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute was founded as a tribute to him in 1917 on his 80th birthday.
Many might have heard of the recent disastrous flooding in parts of the Konkan region, incl in the city of Chiplun. Chiplun is where I grew up & where family & friends still live. It has been sobering to witness the disaster thru phone calls & whatsapp messages & pictures.
As usual, it was neighbors who helped neighbors. It was ordinary ppl who rose to the occasion, more than local govt or national response teams. Ppl rushed to help others & carry them to safer locales; brought food & water to the stranded; arranged for volunteers & local NGOs..
Those on the upper floors invited those on the lower floors to stay with them, while they all saw the latter's loved homes sweep away; others made lunch & breakfast for all. Folks with inverters allowed everyone to come charge their phones so they cud get in touch with loved ones
This is to say thanks to the many medicos who'v been, at great risk of bein abused by trolls, callin out misogyny & sexism in medical circles. Not to mention calling out religious & casteist bigotry which is as prevalent in the medical field as elsewhere in India today.
Thanks also to those who shared stories of how sexism & misogyny hav been trivialized & normalized in the profession (eg this tweet). Sad to see many medicos still refusing to acknowledge these issues & instead choosing to blame feminism, "wokeism" etc
I am sure ther r other medicos who desire to learn & expand their understanding. Since Twitter can be a tricky place to learn such stuff, esp with many so-called influencers actually being bigoted duds, talking directly to decent colleagues around is a better way to go.
There's many non-factual elements here as @sarayupani has pointed out, & many lazy assumptions as @Shehla_Rashid's brave timeline shows.
But it is clear that there r several folks who think this way. So here's my two cents on this phenomenon of privileged Hindu savior complex.
When a person or a group around us is being oppressed, most of us speak out and protest not to do THEM a favor, but bcz we find the act of oppression abhorrent & an assault on basic human values. We r sending a message more to the oppressor than the oppressed..
Yes it's imp for the oppressed to know they're not alone, but it is also imp for the oppressor to know that they ARE alone, that we do not support their actions and ideas. And in that sense, when we privileged speak up (whether for Muslims or other oppressed groups)...
An awesome pleasure of reading academic scholarship is that we begin to look at things we previously thought we knew well, in totally new and different ways. One of many such enlightening instances for me was reading Venera R. Khalikova's 2017 article on Ramdev. (1/n)
There is a lot of excellent research in the article, and i will focus only on a few points from it. As we all know, Ramdev began as a Yoga guru. Khalikova says that India has had many yoga gurus in the past who have done much to bring yoga to the ordinary Indian (and foreigner)..
.."but Ramdev’s success in reaching out to large audiences is truly unprecedented because it is based on the spread of mass media and the growing availability of communication technologies since India’s economic liberalisation."