1/ Thanks for this thread on the paper that came out today, Meg! @kallmemeg
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1460205…
2/ I guess it will take a lot longer - and a different sort of study - to estimate the proportion of asymptomatic infections it will prevent. Until we know how many people are prevented from being infectious, it's hard to know what effect three doses will have on transmission.
3/ BTW, can we please stop calling the third dose a "booster dose"? I'm pretty certain that this will eventually become a three-dose primary course (with subsequent reinforcing doses if necessary, eg if there's waning of immunity or if there are vaccine escape variants.)
4/ Having been asked, earlier, what effect a third dose will have on transmission I wrote something along the following lines…
5/ You reach herd immunity when fewer than one of the people you would have infected is still susceptible to infection. This means that they are unable to be infected and infectious.
6/ (NB - to be infected and infectious, not to be symptomatic. What really matters is the proportion of the secondary cases who will, in turn, be infectious and able to generate tertiary cases.)

R0 (subscript zero) is a theoretical measure of how infectious a disease is.
7/ It is the number of people which (on average) each case will infect. It is pronounced "R-nought" (or, if you're American, "R-naught".)
8/ Of course "on average" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. Some people have a lot more contacts than others. Children and teenagers tend to have very high numbers of contacts; retired people probably relatively few (on average).
9/ And people who have more contacts will infect more people...
10/ It's also the case that the number of people each person infects is far more variable for Covid-19 than it is for other diseases, such as flu...
11/ For the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 virus, R0 is thought to be somewhere between 5 and 10.
health-desk.org/articles/how-c…
12/ But to keep it simple, let's pretend everybody is equally likely to be infected/infectious. And for the ease of the arithmetic, let's pretend Covid's R0 is 10...
13/ That being the case, to achieve herd immunity, you'd have to get immunity rates >90%. That way, more than 9 of the people 10 people you would otherwise have infected will be immune, unable to be infected.
14/ If the disease has an R0 of 5, then you'd need to ensure >4 out of every five people are immune - an immunity rate of >80%.
15/ Of course, it's more complicated than that. What's the R value for people who have had one, two or three doses - how many people will they (on average) go on to infect? It's likely that people will be less likely to be infected/infectious...
16/ And it's more important, if your goal is herd immunity, to get the people who have the most contacts with other people immune, unable to be infected and infect others...
17/ I made some estimates in this blog:
peterenglish.blogspot.com/2021/11/does-h…
18/ I estimated that, after two doses of vaccine, the chance of having any infection is likely to be about 30% what it would if unvaccinated - so the maximum proportion of the population you could get immune and unable to pass the disease on is about 70%.
19/ If R0 is as high as 5 - let alone as high as 9 or 10 - you will never achieve herd immunity, even if 100% of the population is vaccinated with two doses of vaccine.

But after three doses, I estimated that only about 3% of the population can be infected.
20/ If you gave everybody three doses of the vaccine, you'd have 97% immunity - more than enough for herd immunity, even if R0 is 10.

On this basis, it seems unlikely that we will achieve herd immunity with a two-dose vaccination regime.
21/ But if we can get enough people vaccinated with three doses - and especially, enough of the people who have a lot of contact with other people - we would be able to achieve population immunity.
22/ (I have been predicting, confidently, for some time, that the vaccines will become a three-dose vaccination programme, like so many of our other vaccine programmes: a three doses "primary course".
23/ This primary course may subsequently be followed a year or more later by [a] further reinforcing dose[s], if immunity wanes, or if vaccine-escape variants arise.)
24/ But - especially since children and young people tend to have a lot of contacts - we don't have a chance of achieving herd immunity and controlling the virus with vaccination alone, unless we can give a large proportion of children and young people three doses of vaccine.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter English #FBPE

Peter English #FBPE Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @petermbenglish

13 Nov
1/ I use Endnote (20.2 (Bld 15709), to be precise.

It recently had a minor upgrade.

Now it's behaving oddly.

It's fixed one problem - previously it would revert all changes to a record if I deleted a pdf.
2/ This matters to me because it's often easier, when manually adding a reference, to copy a previous reference from the same author or publication, and then to edit the new reference. You don't have to retype a lot of details that were in the previous reference.
3/ But it's created another problem. Now, when you save a reference, the references shown disappear, and the selected reference is some random reference with a low record number.

This is annoying.
Read 6 tweets
12 Nov
I was just at a Covid testing centre (accompanying somebody for a PCR test prior to a procedure).

I am shocked at the PPE used.

Staff wore gowns, plastic aprons, and magic gloves, as if dealing with a predominantly fomite-spread pathogen.
1/10
I've no real problem with the gowns and aprons - although they are likely a waste of money.

The gloves are worse than useless. They should be washing their hands with soap and water regularly (say, every hour); and using alcohol hand gel between patients.
2/10
Wearing gloves provides a false sense of security, and can reduce adherence to good hand-hygiene practice - you feel protected (although the gloves can spread fomites just as easily as bare hands can, if not gelled between patients).
3/10
Read 12 tweets
9 Nov
1/ Following the Prime Minister's decision to be photographed, in Hexham Hospital, without a mask (despite everybody around him wearing one), I thought I'd look out the current guidance.
2/ (He clearly made a point of being filmed and photographed without a mask, and ensuring that those images were widely circulated…
3/ (…Whether this is a defiant dig at the mask-wearing rules he knows are necessary, but he hates, or another of his "dead cat" distraction ploys to draw attention away from gathering scandals, it was clearly deliberate.)
Read 13 tweets
8 Nov
1/ I just made a complaint to the BBC about the use of visors without masks in clips on Strictly Come Dancing this weekend.

Please add your complaint at bbc.co.uk/contact/compla…

The text of my complaint follows.
2/ "We have known since early 2020 that visors without masks are worse than useless at preventing Covid-19 transmission.

"Despite that, many people believe that they are effective, and wear them in the false belief that they are protecting themselves and/or others.
3/ "As Chair of the BMA Public Health Medicine Committee, I was closely involved with BMA messaging to try to correct this false belief - I can't seem to find the infographic we created on the BMA website any more, but see eg bma.org.uk/news-and-opini… .
Read 9 tweets
5 Nov
1/ People with a Great Barrington Declaration bent ("don't do anything to control Covid-19 and hang the consequences - who cares how many people will die...") are now attacking the rest of us for saying we should continue to do what we can to control the disease.
2/ "You want it to go on for ever", they say, echoing the prime minister's "if not now, when?" questions.

It's a complete straw man attack. We have never said that.
3/ There are some discussions about whether we should try to eradicate the virus completely; or just bring it down to controllable levels.

But nobody's saying we need to take precautions for ever.
Read 16 tweets
3 Nov
"Should single rooms be the default for NHS inpatients?" posits @mancunianmedic.

Obviously, it's not possible now, and could take several decades.

The current pandemic - and the previous flu pandemic - emphasised the need for more single rooms…
1/4

bmj.com/content/375/bm…
We needed more single rooms, ideally with negative pressure lobbies, to prevent transmission of airborne diseases.

Covid-19 won't be the last such pandemic.

So, if only for infection control purposes, we need more such rooms.

And yet…
2/4
I looked into the regulations during the flu pandemic.

Not only were there no standards for the number of respiratory infection safe rooms a hospital (even new-builds) should have, regulations on eg the minimum distance between beds were extremely weak or non-existent.
3/4
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(