This is probably the best example of "you can't argue with stupid". Lindell offered a reward to anybody who could prove his data isn't from the 2020 election, but that's like proving there are no space aliens. You can't prove a negative.
https://twitter.com/B26Rick/status/1460348121494564864
All we can show is that it's junk, with nothing tying Lindell's data to the 2020 election. It looks completely made up. It's not "proof" of anything.
I claim to have absolute proof, that's been verified by independent experts, that space aliens hacked the 2020 elections. I'll give $10 million to anybody who proves me wrong!!!
Still can't argue with stupid. "I'll totally ignore that point and shift the conversation to another point, which is also bogus".
As a computer expert, I know that Splunk logs and routers wouldn't show the election was hacked.
As a computer expert, I know that Splunk logs and routers wouldn't show the election was hacked.
https://twitter.com/B26Rick/status/1460351149320638464
The most such logs could show is that election computers were improperly connected to the network instead of airgapped. Since they record only metadata and not content, it'd be impossible to show whether hacking occurred.
At the symposium, when cyberexperts were pointing out Lindell's "proof" was junk, the response was "the Mesa county image is real proof". When the Mesa image proved to be junk, it became "just wait until the Maricopa audit". Now it's "wait until Nov 23"
https://twitter.com/B26Rick/status/1460352075477528580
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
