1/ I finally got around to debunking that Daniel Jones report on the AlfaBank-Trump affair mentioned by @briankrebs.

The most important debunking is Finding #5, as it clearly shows the nature of conspiracy-theory.
blog.erratasec.com/2021/10/debunk…
2/ The Wikipedia defines "conspiracy-theory" thusly. It's an unsatisfying definition because much of the time, there is no alternate explanation.

That's why I use the definition "when the lack of an alternate explanation is claimed as proof of the conspiracy".
3/ In this case, the NYTimes contacted AlfaBank on Sept 21, 2016, and two days later, the domain name (mail1.trump-email.com) disappeared.

This is too much of a coincidence to happen just by chance. As the Jones report describes it:
4/ Five years ago when I was debunking this, reporters would grill me on this, demanding that I come up with another explanation. I couldn't. I could only point out that there could be lots of unknown explanations.
5/ There was good reason to doubt the conspiracy-theory. There was no direct connection between the Trump Org and the domain name. It was created by marketing firm "Cendyn" when Trump Hotels was a customer, and hosted on Cendyn servers.
6/ Cendyn creates domain names like this for customers: hyatt-email.com, denihan-email.com, mjh-email.com, and so on.

But Trump ceased being a customer in March 2016, so eventually Cendyn would get around to removing the name from their DNS servers.
7/ But now 5 years later, with the Durham indictment and leaks of Strzok text messages we find out what really happened.

The FBI called Cendyn on the morning of Sept 23 and asked about the domain. The agent's text message was:
8/ The coincidental timing is that the Democrat operative (Sussman) contacted both the NYTimes and the FBI at around the same time, who in turn sent out queries.

It's the FBI query to Cendyn that caused the deletion, not the NYTimes query to AlfaBank.
9/ The point of this thread is that for 5 years people didn't have an alternate explanation. The only explanation that fit was the conspiracy. Thus, it was seen as confirming the conspiracy-theory.
10/ The point of this thread is recognizing something is a conspiracy-theory before you know the correct answer, going back 5 years and being able to recognize then that while you can't explain the coincidental timing, it's not evidence confirming the conspiracy-theory.
11/ The explanation of the NYTimes-AlfaBank-TrumpOrg chain of events wasn't an explanation because it created more questions than it answered, namely, the fact that the TrumpOrg didn't control the name, Cendyn did.
12/ For that to work, we now need to believe there's some super-secret business relationship that continues between TrumpOrg and Cendyn despite their overt public relationship with Trump Hotels being canceled.
13/ That's a lot of people at both Trump Org and Cendyn who somehow have kept their silence on this conspiracy for all this time. There are endless unresolved questions.
12/ Conversely, the correct explanation doesn't have such holes. Cendyn served the name on their DNS servers, had dissolved the business contract with TrumpOrg months before, and when the FBI called, noticed the name should be removed, and did so.
13/ The point is, we can recognize conspiracy-theories as being conspiracy-theories even when we can't come up with any alternate explanation.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Robᵉʳᵗ Graham

Robᵉʳᵗ Graham Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ErrataRob

31 Oct
1/ It's weird how much this Rachel Maddow episode repeats Mike Lindell almost verbatim. Both assure us that data showing a conspiracy has been validated by cyberexperts, and that no credible expert has refuted it.

I'm a credible expert, and I refute both.
2/ There is no "Trump server". The Trump org had no control over the domain, and barring some vast convoluted theory probably involving space aliens, no control over the "server" that the domain pointed to.
3/ The domain was created by Cendyn, a hotel marketing company. Among their marketing activities is sending bulk emails, which they outsource to a company called Listrak.
Read 17 tweets
29 Oct
This is "Cybersecurity Awareness Month". It's a good time to remind people that it's stupid.

The idea of "security" is inherently irrational and political. The following is a good example. There's never the political will to not be scared. The only question is "how scared".
It's like "active shooter" drills in school. All the evidence points to them being ineffective.

This won't stop schools from doing them, because security is important.
shrm.org/resourcesandto…
Same with armed security guards in school. There's no evidence they help. There's a lot of evidence they make other things worse, elevating normal disciplinary issues into law enforcement issues.
contemporarypediatrics.com/view/can-armed…
Read 5 tweets
29 Oct
1/ Yes, yes, most of the health misinformation really is crazy conspiracy nonsense spreading like memes on the Facebook.

But at the same time, Dr. Murthy is one of the jack-booted thugs angry at the fact that their authority is being challenged.
2/ Take vaccines and masks, the things that people get really angry about. The scientific data supporting the "safety" and "efficacy" of vaccines is really, REALLY good.

But the data for masks is shitty, REALLY shitty. And yet, we can't acknowledge this.
3/ There's good reason to believe that masks help reduce the spread. It may be only a little, but it may be the factor that reduces R₀ from 1.1 down to 0.9, meaning a small effect can have huge consequences.

So there's good reasons to support mask mandate policies.
Read 7 tweets
28 Oct
I'm confused. Which is she saying?
a) politicians should interfere with the independence of prosecutors
b) politicians should not interfere with the independence of prosecutors
In our system, prosecutors are independent. That's why it's so important when Trump coerced Ukraine politicians to prosecute Hunter Biden. It's also why it's so important Biden isn't involved in Jan 6 prosecutions.
politico.com/news/2021/10/1…
Politicians deciding who should (or should not) be prosecuted based on politics is a very bad thing.
Read 6 tweets
26 Oct
If it includes trying to justify a bigger budget, then you are doing cybersecurity wrong.
2/ Ok, let's explain this.

The reason is this is the 99% of the conversations the CEO has. EVERYBODY is convinced they need a bigger budget. And they all have the same reasons.
3/ Put it another way, the CEO has already decided their reasons weren't good enough, so that when you make the same arguments, they'll decide your arguments aren't good enough.
Read 11 tweets
25 Oct
FYI: "audit" logs and "forensics" logs are different beasts.

Traditionally, an "audit" is when the auditor is trying to confirm something specific, like whether your numbers add up or you correctly followed procedures.

A "forensics" investigation is open-ended, indeterminate.
An audit starts with something is known, such as reporting quarterly results, and seeks to confirm that they are actually true.

A forensics results with an unsolved crime, and hopes to maybe find out what happened, and half the time, comes to no conclusion.
They do overlap. Forensic auditors seek to find money that people try to hide off books or embezzle, for example. Before computer logs, I'm not sure if there was an important distinction.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(