Totalitarians constantly rewrite history not only to make the past conform to Party ideology, but as a means of demoralization and control. There is nothing more dispiriting than being forced to relinquish your history and recite a false new one. Kill a tree by cutting its roots.
Controlling history lets totalitarians construct a narrative of "false consciousness" around their adversaries. Those who remember true history, and cherish traditions disliked by the Party, are treated like they're insane. Accurate memory becomes a form of mental illness.
When history is written in sand, shifting and changing as Party leadership demands, the people become anxious and fearful. Remembering the "wrong" thing can get you in trouble. You have to pay close attention to Party decrees to know today's "correct" history.
Rewriting history is a great way to separate children from their parents, which is always a high priority for totalitarians. Children are taught the latest version of Party history and told their parents are ignorant. History becomes a special bond between children and the Party.
Keeping history in flux prevents cultural traditions from taking root and threatening the authority of the State. Attacking history is a nuclear first strike against conservatism, because it erases everything worth conserving - nothing that predates the Party has any authority.
An old bit of folk wisdom says: How can you know who you are, and where you're going, unless you know where you come from? Totalitarians understand that idea, maybe even better than most conservatives - so they attack the past to make people feel rootless and easy to shape.
The past cannot be allowed to have any authority that supersedes or challenges the Party and its "progressive" ideology. Totalitarians ALWAYS claim to be "progressives" who are moving "forward" and fighting "regression." That's an explicit rejection of history and its authority.
Totalitarians worship power. What better way to demonstrate power than by conquering memory itself, rewriting the past to suit Party ideology? The Chinese Communist Party is doing it right now, with great ceremony. Challenging its new revised history will be a punishable offense.
Revising history is also a cheap way to valorize Party ideology and make its members feel heroic. The implication is that if the Party had been around 200, 300, 400 years ago, it would have prevented all the injustices it dwells upon. It would have kicked the past's ass sideways.
If only the Party and its beautiful ideology had been in power a thousand years ago, we'd be a thousand years closer to paradise! Notice how often the past is portrayed with contempt in pop culture - its dumb, bigoted, sexist authorities humbled by fictional progressive heroes.
Every totalitarian movement pushes the idea that history truly began when the Party came to power. All that went before was prologue - clay to be shaped by modern political officers to teach whatever ideological lessons they desire. The birth of the Party was the dawn of justice.
Totalitarians mock the "dead hand of the past," but there's actually something quite liberating and individualistic about knowing your history, respecting your traditions, honoring your ancestors. If there were giants before, there can be giants again.
If history is a rock, then great things can be built upon it. That's why totalitarians insist on grinding that rock down into sand. They believe ideology can triumph over everything: physics, economics, biology, human nature - and history. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Hayward

John Hayward Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Doc_0

11 Nov
If some of the lefty social media hot takes on the Rittenhouse trial seem confusing, understand they think left-wing stormtroopers and rioters have an absolute right to occupy and destroy any territory they please, and if there are injuries when you oppose them, it's on YOU.
This is the core logic of terrorism: our cause is righteous, our demands must be granted, and if you force us to hurt you or destroy your property to get what we want, it's YOUR fault. You can stop the violence at any time by submitting. The ball is in YOUR court.
Needless to say, the Left does not think anyone but themselves has any such intrinsic right to occupy and destroy. They believe they have a monopoly on righteous political violence. Only THEY should be given "space to destroy."
Read 11 tweets
10 Nov
We're entering the dangerous kamikaze phase of the Democrat's all-out War on the Middle Class. As with Obamacare, leadership will be telling imperiled Dems their seats are a small price to pay for inflicting irreversible changes on the American people.
There is no one on Earth as rapacious, greedy, and materialistic as a socialist politician. Dems understand that grabbing our money ends a political battle. Once the spending bills are passed, budget baselines rise, and government employees are hired, there is no going back.
The lesson of Obamacare will be repeated to doomed Dems as they tie on their kamikaze headbands. Sure, we got clobbered in a few elections - but we seized control of a huge chunk of the U.S. economy forever! We permanently changed the relationship between citizens and the State!
Read 12 tweets
3 Nov
A strong factor in U.S. elections is the public's growing awareness that the political elite are completely insulated from the effects of the policies they impose on the rest of us. It correctly makes voters wary of those policies.
Private jets and giant motorcades at global warming conferences, people who live behind armed guards crusading against gun rights, elite leftists trying to abolish the police in troubled neighborhoods, diehard enemies of school choice sending THEIR kids to private schools...
It's all hypocritical, sure, but the public reaction is growing into more than just annoyance at flagrant hypocrisy. It is sobering to realize that the people trying to control every aspect of your life have no intention whatsoever of sharing the burdens they impose on you.
Read 8 tweets
3 Nov
Wonder if the climate summit contributed to the GOP wave last night. The media has been shoving it in everyone's face as a top story every day. People worried about post-pandemic recovery hear lunatics gibbering about trillion-dollar schemes and demanding the U.S. pay more.
The climate stuff is usually just a background hum to normal people - a media elite obsession that sounds like Charlie Brown's teachers wah-wah-wahhing to folks worried about jobs, rising prices, empty store shelves, and their children's education.
The elite can't stop talking about climate change, they're absolutely obsessed with it, and the media treats it like the most important story in the world, but it simply is not a top-10 issue for voters. They usually just roll their eyes at the obsessive coverage and move on.
Read 7 tweets
2 Nov
One reason Dems are so comically furious over "Let's Go Brandon" is they understand it's the kind of thing that triggers preference cascades - a moment when people look around and realize that huge numbers of their neighbors share what the ruling party claims is a fringe opinion.
The Left expends a huge amount of effort on making its adversaries feel marginalized. They mastered the dark art of making the majority FEEL like a fringe minority. The demoralization-destabilization-subversion strategy of the Left is designed to make normal people feel abnormal.
"Let's Go Brandon" is a moment when vast numbers of Americans who have been told Joe Biden won a sweeping election victory, and has a mystical mandate to destroy and rebuild America, look around and realize most of the country severely dislikes him and distrusts his media.
Read 12 tweets
29 Oct
There are basically two ways to get people to do something: persuasion and compulsion. The key difference is that persuasion can take "no" for an answer. This is by definition. If I can refuse, you must persuade me to agree.
This seems like a very simple observation, but it's crucial to understanding the difference between free societies and authoritarian states. Authoritarianism LOVES to masquerade as democracy and cloak itself in the language of persuasion and freedom, but it's a lie.
An early example of this bait and switch was when the Left started referring to taxes as "investments," stealing the language of free-market capitalism to conceal its authoritarian greed. Investments are discretionary. I can refuse to invest. You must persuade me to buy in.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(