.@BGrueskin chides US media for embracing the Steele dossier, but in the process he does what he's criticizing: accepting partisan-tied, evidence-free Russiagate claims as fact. nytimes.com/2021/11/15/opi…
The claim of Russian "hacking into Democrats' emails" is full of evidentiary holes, heavily caveated in Mueller's report, & was generated by another Clinton contractor, Crowdstrike, which later admitted that it had no evidence.
(realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2021/…)
(realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2021/…)
The claim that a Russian troll farm used "Facebook and other social media companies to foment dissent and unrest" is a joke. The posts were juvenile, barely seen, barely about the election, and mostly came *after* the election.
(thenation.com/article/archiv…)
(realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/…)
(thenation.com/article/archiv…)
(realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/…)
The Senate Intel claim that Kilimnik is "a Kremlin agent" has zero supporting evidence & is contradicted by ample countervailing facts, including KK's extensive State Dept. ties. Note that no US intel/security agency has adopted that characterization. (realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2021/…)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
