"For instance, in 2012 we launched the Equivac vaccine, which protects horses from infection and thus prevents transmission of Hendra virus from horses to humans"
26. 2014 - Bat’s immunity may hold key to preventing future Ebola outbreaks (Michele Baker)
If we redirect the immune responses of other species to behave the same way as bats, the high death rate of diseases such as Ebola could be a thing of the past
1. CSIRO helps "developing' China with Biosafety 2. CSIRO teaches Chinese bat virus isolation methodology (Tweet 6) 3. CSIRO - WIV - EHa SARS Paper (2005) Tweet 7 4. PZ, ZLS & LFW at CSIRO 5. PZ & LFW Human & Bat Toll Like Receptors - 2010 (Tweet 11)
34. Summary so far (2)
6. Nipah, Ebola Research and Hendra Vaccine (CSIRO) 7. Bat Immune system & longevity research at CSIRO 8. Bat immune system & longevity research at WIV
9, Live Bat Colony at WIV (and Singapore under LFW)
35. Live Bats at WIV - Myotis Davidii
Why did WIV keep Myotis species bats at WIV in 2017?
Because of their longevity (lifespan up to 37 years)
Growing old, yet staying young: The role of telomeres in bats’ exceptional longevity
36. WIV worked with wild-caught out bred bats and their own colony of live bats (Myotis) as well as splenocytes, tissue and cell lines from these bats.
Primary cells can also harbor latent viruses that can become reactivated during in vitro cultivation when the cells are outside the host and isolated from other components of the immune system that would otherwise control virus replication
39. Repeat (2)
"Cell lines from any species of bat should therefore only be handled under controlled biosafety conditions and thoroughly tested before being used for experimental studies. This is also a limitation when working with wild-caught bats"
In addition to cell lines, there is a need for lab bred bats with known infection status for ex & in vivo experiments. Establishing a wild-caught bat colony is challenging but achievable with sufficient resources to house the bats
This thread began with CSIRO and revealed how CSIRO shared their techniques and research with Chinese Bat Researchers who went on to develop these techniques in China.
Now back to CSIRO - AAHL Lab
51. Beating the world's deadliest viral villains #CSIRO
1. Federal agencies like the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) as well as the NIAID were funding a remarkable array of research projects around the world..
2. "through a small cabal of civilian actors that in aggregate constituted a de facto bioweapons development program. In my job as data analyst for University of California, I had access to enough data to strongly suspect the existence of such a program"
He has a MA in Biophysics from the University of California, Berkeley. He worked as an analyst for thirty years in the University of California’s Office of the President.
2. The whistleblower just testified that following pressure & interference from mid-level & senior CIA leadership, the team's lab-leak findings were suppressed.
3. On August 17, 2021, the team was forced to reverse its stance and officially submit a conclusion stating they were unable to determine the origin, which formed the basis of the declassified ODNI report released later that month.
This is GOF research via experimental adaptation increasing pathogenicity which is DURC because it involves a listed high-risk pathogen and increases virulence via serial passage in a key reservoir host. i.e. DUCKS!
The Jiangsu researchers deliberately turned a relatively mild H5N6 avian influenza virus into a highly lethal killer of ducks through repeated serial passage in duck cells and live mallard ducks.
3. Good opportunity to boost my Video from 2013!
What originally caused zero deaths in mallards was rapidly adapted into a strain causing up to 100% mortality, massive viral replication in organs, and severe disease..
2. Prof Peter Shields, Professor of Medical Oncology at Ohio State University
“This paper does not add anything we do not already know, but selectively cites studies (and omits many others that refute the authors statements throughout) that leads the reader down the wrong path"
3. Prof Peter Shields (2)
“None of their mechanistic studies (selectively cited) has been validated as actual risk predictors in people, and the authors failure to recognize that leads to harmful conclusions."
Critical Examination of 3 Related Studies on SARS-CoV-2 Origins
My latest paper, a pleasantly vicious critique, reveals exactly how the zoonati clique try to bamboozle gullible journalists and scientists to drive their biased narrative of natural originresearchgate.net/publication/40…
2. This core interpretive move by the authors, from failure to detect a shift in selection pressure to claiming strong evidence of “no adaptation being required”, exemplifies the pernicious absence of evidence-based reasoning so characteristic of their tedious papers.
3. Yet, a small cluster of publications from a recurring group of agenda driven authors continues to exert disproportionate and malign influence on the debate over the origins of SARS-COV-2.