The UK campaign sits in human rights framework. Gathering pace away from viewing LGBTQ+ people not as ill
Recommends Victor Madrigals report. All calls of CT can cause intense humiliation. Creates self disgust. Begins with belief that someone is sick and needs to be treated. Suicidal ideation is higher
The balance of evidence is clear. All forms of CT cause harm.
It is very clear that talking forms of CT cause harm
(NB: this is not what the Coventry Uni research found)
Prohibit CT everywhere.
The rights based case: international govts are very concerned.
Is it happening. Here.
Trans people are twice as likely to be offered CT
NB: this was a self selected survey you can't draw this conclusion
The Coventry University research found the same thing. 🤔
MOU CT: an attempt to change sexual orientation or GI
It should be outcome neutral
There are 13 countries with a ban. Other countries considering bans.
What should it cover? Should cover all settings including religious and domestic setting. Supporting people coming to terms with their SO or GI should not be.
LGBTQ people are beautiful. We don't need to be changed
Naomi Cunningham - Dow we need the proposed law? Evidence of harm, convincing case that legislation can work, clear proposal. Debate
Debate is critical. This idea
To find the CEO of Stonewall on the same panel as me. So thank you Nancy
We don't know what the conversion theory survey responses mean.
Govt did not find evidence of harm. We don't have evidence
The case for legislation - not every harm can be put right with legislation.
The govt therapy proposal muddles being gay and gender dysphoria.
It is a medical condition.
Imagine you are a therapist. You have a gender non conforming child, who is expressing that they want to be the opposite sex. As a therapist you have to act
The proposed law provides a safeguard to allow therapists to act if if a child is questioning. But this child is not questioning, they are sure. The law would make it illegal.
Naomi talks about homophobic bullying and about Denton's report
Question from Kate Harris. How can you base good law on a feeling rather than a fact
Robin there is a debate over how we should amend the EqA protected characteristics.
This law is about oppressive behaviour
Nancy Kelly answers Kate Harris's question.
We don't have to use the language of "gender identity" can say "trans or non binary person"
Jayne Ozanne apologises to any trans gender people present and gets applause
Talks about child committing suicide
A child knows who they are. trans is not a medical issue
Question on consent. If I can consent to CT being gay is a lifestyle choice. How can I consent to greavious psychological harm.
Naomi. How can a child who hasn't yet developed though puberty consent to the grevious physical harm of puberty blockers and sterilisation? This will be be the scandal of our age.
Nancy: we are talking about two different things - the care package of a trans minor and the ban of conversion therapy.
The idea of consent is impossible when people can be cast out from their church and their community.
Jayne - Article 3 - states are under a duty to protect. All govts are obliged to protect.
@BluskyeAllison: how are you going to stop lesbians being harrased to accept transgender males into their dating pool when you are comparing lesbians to racists and anti Semites. It is coercion
We are talking about two seperate things lesbian sexuality and who people date. I don't think it is relevant to how we provide protection to young adults
Jayne Ozanne I don't think I understand the question. What we are here to do is to protect the right of people to chose.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Prof Whittle appears to be arguing individuals shouldn't be able to held liable for sexual harassment if their inappropriate behaviour was sanctioned by their employer.
I gave evidence in the Sandie Peggie case because the hospital board & male Dr refused to accept as findings of fact that that men are more likely to commit violent & sexual crimes, that men are more dangerous to women, so women are more heavily impacted by men in their spaces than vice versa.
You can read my witness statement here.
These are the facts it attests to.
You don't need a degree of any sort to understand these facts.
I've written to @stonewalluk CEO Simon Blake applauding his leadership in discarding Stonewall's previous extreme and divisive definition of "transphobia".
And explaining the damage that it did.
It's not good enough to quietly back away from it after doubling down for so long