The UK campaign sits in human rights framework. Gathering pace away from viewing LGBTQ+ people not as ill
Recommends Victor Madrigals report. All calls of CT can cause intense humiliation. Creates self disgust. Begins with belief that someone is sick and needs to be treated. Suicidal ideation is higher
The balance of evidence is clear. All forms of CT cause harm.
It is very clear that talking forms of CT cause harm
(NB: this is not what the Coventry Uni research found)
Prohibit CT everywhere.
The rights based case: international govts are very concerned.
Is it happening. Here.
Trans people are twice as likely to be offered CT
NB: this was a self selected survey you can't draw this conclusion
The Coventry University research found the same thing. 🤔
MOU CT: an attempt to change sexual orientation or GI
It should be outcome neutral
There are 13 countries with a ban. Other countries considering bans.
What should it cover? Should cover all settings including religious and domestic setting. Supporting people coming to terms with their SO or GI should not be.
LGBTQ people are beautiful. We don't need to be changed
Naomi Cunningham - Dow we need the proposed law? Evidence of harm, convincing case that legislation can work, clear proposal. Debate
Debate is critical. This idea
To find the CEO of Stonewall on the same panel as me. So thank you Nancy
We don't know what the conversion theory survey responses mean.
Govt did not find evidence of harm. We don't have evidence
The case for legislation - not every harm can be put right with legislation.
The govt therapy proposal muddles being gay and gender dysphoria.
It is a medical condition.
Imagine you are a therapist. You have a gender non conforming child, who is expressing that they want to be the opposite sex. As a therapist you have to act
The proposed law provides a safeguard to allow therapists to act if if a child is questioning. But this child is not questioning, they are sure. The law would make it illegal.
Naomi talks about homophobic bullying and about Denton's report
Question from Kate Harris. How can you base good law on a feeling rather than a fact
Robin there is a debate over how we should amend the EqA protected characteristics.
This law is about oppressive behaviour
Nancy Kelly answers Kate Harris's question.
We don't have to use the language of "gender identity" can say "trans or non binary person"
Jayne Ozanne apologises to any trans gender people present and gets applause
Talks about child committing suicide
A child knows who they are. trans is not a medical issue
Question on consent. If I can consent to CT being gay is a lifestyle choice. How can I consent to greavious psychological harm.
Naomi. How can a child who hasn't yet developed though puberty consent to the grevious physical harm of puberty blockers and sterilisation? This will be be the scandal of our age.
Nancy: we are talking about two different things - the care package of a trans minor and the ban of conversion therapy.
The idea of consent is impossible when people can be cast out from their church and their community.
Jayne - Article 3 - states are under a duty to protect. All govts are obliged to protect.
@BluskyeAllison: how are you going to stop lesbians being harrased to accept transgender males into their dating pool when you are comparing lesbians to racists and anti Semites. It is coercion
We are talking about two seperate things lesbian sexuality and who people date. I don't think it is relevant to how we provide protection to young adults
Jayne Ozanne I don't think I understand the question. What we are here to do is to protect the right of people to chose.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The OfS-Sussex judgement is logically flawed and can't be allowed to stand. @ObhishekSaha with a very good analogy about paths.
Sussex's defence was that it had a high level sign saying "this path will only be closed for very good reasons". Therefore it must have had a very good reason 🙄
In order to keep the footpath functionally open the local authority has to apply some rules to the users of the path. It has a duty to keep the path open for cyclists and pedestrians, but not for motorbikes. This is in the bye-laws
(this is the university's equality act compliant equality policy that is part of its governance)
There are some short parts of the path that are so unavoidably narrow that the local authority puts up signs saying "cyclists dismount here" to keep the whole path safe and open for all users.
That is fine, the path is still open to pedestrians and cyclists.
(that's a proportionate means to a legitimate aim in the Equality Act, its "no noisy protests that disrupt exams")
This is quite the exercise in missing the point by Prof Shreya Atrey in Modern Law Review.
FWS will have a severe impact on "transgender, gender fluid, gender non-conforming, polygender, genderqueer and intersex" it says (without defining any of these terms).
Remember, FWS was just about whether a GRC changes a person's sex for the purpose of the Equality Act.
Atrey says the protected characteristic of sex should be amended to include sex characteristics, gender, gender identity, gender expression and gender performance. 🤨
A curious thing about the draft government guidance: It has no conceptual underpinning at all
“In recent years, we have seen a significant increase in the number of children who are questioning the way they feel about being a boy or a girl, including the physical attributes of their sex and the related ways in which they fit into society. “
Er ok…🤷♀️
It then dives into “where a child or their parent has raised a request relating to social transition”
The phrase appears 29 times in the guidance, but is never explained what it means or what it might involve.
The schools are told they must "consider what is in the best interests of the child and other children, and a decision relating to social transition may not be the same as a child’s wishes. "
The phrase “gender identity” appears 36 times in the judgment
Leonardo’s policy is that any member of staff who is proposing to to undergo, is undergoing or has undergone a process for the purposes of reassigning their gender can use the toilets intended for the opposite sex.
I am hugely grateful to Naomi Cunningham for the work that she has done as the first chair of Sex Matters, and for her equally important role as a barrister representing claimants using the law to fight for justice.