An attempt is being made some Tower Hamlets businesses to divide the wider community in order to protect their commercial interests
This leaflet was delivered via a paid Royal Mail delivery organised by communications company based in Romford
Sent by 1st class mail just before
1/
Neighbourhood Plan referendum last week presumably to an area defined by Royal Mail, as sent to households not named individuals
As Royal Mail areas are quite large 1,000s of homes may have got it
But they are not allowed (by regulation) to spend more than £2,604 on campaign
2/
Will the anti-campaign report how much they spent to @TowerHamletsNow ?
Plus imprint on leaflet is also not fully compliant with electoral law & has been reported to the Council & Police (& I will report to the SET elections team later)
This raises a number of national issues
3/
The leaflet was designed to encourage voters to vote No to the Spitalfields Neighbourhood Plan
They almost succeeded
The yes vote in Spitalfields was 54% versus the 89% average yes vote in the 19 other referendums in London
Across the country there have been thousands of yes
4/
votes & a tiny handful of no votes (4 I am aware of for specific reasons)
This has been a very successful attempt to bring local people & businesses into the planning processes across the country
Except in Spitalfields
See here for background
neighbourhoodplanning.org
5/
Presumably, some businesses in that area wanted less planning controls over property they own & decided to organise & fund an anti-campaign
But I suspect based on their leaflet they were ignorant of what a Neighbourhood Plan can or cannot do & the regulations
6/
Businesses in the area also had a vote last Thursday in the referendum as well as residents
70 businesses voted no, 18 yes, it will be interesting to see what types of businesses voted no
But majority of residents voted yes
When there is a split vote like this Council decides
7/
Council can decide to go with residents Yes vote or business No vote
This will happen via a vote of Councillors in January we think (will be mentioned tonight in a full Council meeting which is why I am doing these tweets as background)
The business lobby is now attacking
8/
individuals involved in the Neighbourhood Plan as they lost the residents vote
So Councillors will need to decide
Do they support democracy & the residents Yes vote
or
Support a campaign based on mis-information, £££, lies & division?
9/
The key issue is what were the planning policies businesses were against?
I suspect they did not read the Plan
Neighbourhood Plans add extra planning policies that affect future planning applications
Pics show key points in the Neighbourhood Plan here
towerhamlets.gov.uk/Documents/Plan…
10/
So the Neighbourhood Plan would only impact a business that owned land in the Neighbourhood Plan area that it wanted to re-develop
Cannot be used to stop development, does not over ride existing Council planning policy but does add specific extra local policies
Which of
11/
these policies stop development?
It is in businesses long term financial interest to ensure the Spitalfields area is a nice area to live in & visit as that will bring more business to them even if it means some limited constraints on individual planning applications
12/
I will now detail why the leaflet is full of lies / misinformation /misunderstanding of the Neighbourhood Planning process
I added red numbers to the picture to explain each point
towerhamlets.gov.uk/lgnl/planning_…
13/
Pt 1 - 'handful of people' this is the list of people actively involved in the Plan
Both the Council (Mayor John Biggs and Cabinet) & the Independent Examiner Jill Kingaby would have failed the Plan & stopped a referendum had they believed it was serving the interests of a few
14
Pt 2 - the Spitalfields plan area has different boundaries to the Spitalfields & Banglatown ward - it had a different name in order to make clear it covered a different area
Only the Boundary Commission & the Council can change ward names not Neighbourhood Plans
Ironically
15/
tonight the Council is looking at changing ward names but this came about because of recommendations from the Labour Party not a Neighbourhood Plan
democracy.towerhamlets.gov.uk/documents/s194…
16/
Pt 3 - the borders only apply on a planning map & that map only applies to planning applications = cannot create any division except to developers
Many such planning borders already exist (see the Council Local Plan map)
These are largely invisible
towerhamlets.gov.uk/Documents/Plan…
17/
Pt 4 - Is this why businesses paid for this leaflet? - it does add some extra planning policies to any business that wants to make major changes to the outside of its building or redevelop it
Has no impact on other small businesses except to provide more affordable workspace
18/
Pt 5 - this is an old lie & ignores the Local Infrastructure Fund consultation run by Tower Hamlets Council on where to spend 25% of any Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) £ received from developers
talk.towerhamlets.gov.uk/lif
19/
The Neighbourhood Plan can make recommendations as well (see pic for their preferred projects) but ultimately Council Officers make the decisions not the Neighbourhood Plan
Most LIF £ spent on officer chosen projects so far not what residents want
20/
Pt 6 - a naked appeal to divide the community of the area to protect a few businesses commercial interests
And mostly incorrect - Neighbourhood Plans have limted powers within the planning system
Nothing to do with identity, rights, ability to influence etc etc
21/
Pt 7 Another lie by people who have a commercial interest who if they had actually bothered to read the Neighbourhood Plan would have seen it was in their long term business interest
This leaflet damages the community by creating fear and division through lies
22/
This raises a number of national issues for @luhc about the conduct of referendums when an anti-campaign (extremely rare) may have overspent spending limits, did not provide a clear imprint & provides misleading information
23/
Last point is what will the Council & Councillors now do in response?
They should make it clear they support the resident Yes vote & support the Spitalfields Neighbourhood Plan - and oppose any division
@SpitalfieldsNPF @ELAdvertiser @EastEndEnquirer
24/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Wood

Andrew Wood Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Andrewwood17

16 Nov
Rebuild St Georges pool in Shadwell or expand John Orwell center in Wapping
Crudely that seems to be the choice in the leisure services consultation that started yesterday even if the questions are less clear
Read the 2 docs in the document library not
talk.towerhamlets.gov.uk/leisure
1/
just the main consultation document which is less clear
The feasibility study options show what the Council is really thinking about
The consultation I suspect is really between that choice:
St Georges or John Orwell
Somehow I doubt the Council has the ambition to do both
2/
The leisure consultation is not really about leisure services at all
But what to do with the now closed St Georges pool
It has been allowed to deteriorate to the extent that the costs are now:
£9.9 million just to re-open it
20 years more life would cost c. £23.4m incl £9.9m
3/
Read 10 tweets
9 Nov
Unfortunately for a 2nd weekend running the Labour Party have delivered these same leaflets containing Council email & phone numbers that they were expressly told not to use in October (& 2018 & 2019)
Evidence of this has been supplied to the Council CEO & Monitoring Officer
1/
after each weekend but has not had any impact yet
But I do not expect any changes to be made until after these leaflets have all been delivered (we have seen this behavior before in previous elections)
But lots of Labour Cllrs busy distributing them

2/
But this will be reported to the Special Enquiry Team at the Metropolitan Police as one of the first (but not the last) breach of standards before next Mays elections
Distribution across Tower Hamlets in marginal wards

3/
Read 7 tweets
1 Nov
Where you delivered this leaflet by the Labour Party?
When & where?
And did they use this Council email on them
mayor@towerhamlets.gov.uk
& this phone number 0207 365 4000?
These are both answered by Council officers & politicians were clearly told on the 15th October by the
1/
Councils monitoring officer not to use Council emails and phone numbers on their party political leaflets
I think this leaflet was delivered at the weekend (tbc)
If you got one can you let me know where & when?
As a response, by private message, email cllrandrewwood@gmail.com
2/
This keeps happening at elections - the misuse of Council resources by the Labour Party
I have similar emails from the monitoring officer in previous elections so in reality Labour party already knew not to do this before October

3/
Read 4 tweets
12 Oct
TH Council Internal Audit find limited assurance in the Councils "Aluminium Composite Material (ACM) Information and Record Management" service
Service paid for by MHCLG has problems
In part because trying to use MS Excel spreadsheet to track everything
democracy.towerhamlets.gov.uk/documents/s192…
1/
TH Council is too dependent on Excel
But also clear problems with work not being done, letters not sent in time, data missing, staff turnover issues
795 private blocks over 18 meters on spreadsheet = 293 buildings applied for BSF money = 37% of buildings with issues but 158
2/
owners have not provided full information to the Council
The report is not all bad but you get little sense that this an emergency that affects a 1/3 of buildings in TH
& striking that TH Council has not invested any of the huge amounts of £ it has earn't from these buildings
3/
Read 4 tweets
30 Sep
"Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector has determined that a Written Statement of Action is required because of significant areas of weakness in the area’s practice"
Hugely disappointed that TH Council again does badly in an OFSTED inspection this time on SEND
And does not disclose
1/
they get letter 5th July, report published Monday!
I was not aware of this report, it was not mentioned by anybody in last nights full Council meeting
We should have had an emergency update about this rather than about price of milk in Tesco
This is about whether we are
2/
effectively looking after the most vulnerable children in TH
SEND = Special Educational Needs and Disability where OFSTED found we had "significant areas of weakness"
We should have had an update on this on the 2nd September almost 2 months after 1st draft of letter sent to TH
3/
Read 6 tweets
29 Sep
Tonight at Council is a rather strange Labour motion, it starts:
1. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) intends to close the JobCentre Plus branch based at Dod Street, Poplar.
2. That the reasons for the closure are due to the landlord not renewing the lease
Why odd?
1/
Clearly, we do not want the Job Centre closing & I would support asking the DWP to find another location so I am not sure what the 30 minute debate is about, we can all agree to that
What is odd is that since July 2019 TH Council has known of plans to re-develop the site
2/ ImageImage
for 84 homes in a new 8 storey building & to close the Job Centre
And in November 2020 TH Councillors voted unanimously to approve the development which included the transfer of the Job Centre to Mansell Street
democracy.towerhamlets.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=1…
3/ ImageImage
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(