Anyone watching it without comment is no friend of human rights. Whatever else they do, however ‘kind’ they like to think themselves, however much they trumpet that they are ‘human rights advocates’, they have been tried. And they have been found wanting.
John Smith may be an extreme example. But my old head of chambers, Sir Ivan Lawrence QC, not only had a regular practice at the Old Bailey, he sat on standing committees (considering legislation), introduced a backbench Bill that became law and held the record for filibustering.
In other words, unlike the (largely) dross that sit in the House of Commons now, he was a legislator, giving his expertise and experience to explain what works, what doesn’t, what would he objectionable and why.
Look at the vacant expression on the clown.
Can we never again give any responsibility to wonks with no judgement dressed like 14 year olds.
Another one; and fixed.
So we delegated one of the most important decisions in peacetime to a bunch of scruffy youths who spend their time gaming in basements?
In the light of the narrative that we didn’t ‘lock down’ early enough, here is a thread from last year in which I provide context. The submissions have been published here: committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidenc….
Casting aside all precedent, advice and proportion was never the right answer.
You really cannot stop. Lying and lying and lying again. As you know very well, the insane modelling of your cronies was so inaccurate it was worthy of the epithet ‘Fergusonian’.
Insofar as there is a crisis, it is a crisis of the casualties of lockdown. The victims of your lies.
This is hardly a surprise. Cambridge has allowed itself to become a fiscal supplicant of the PRC as have so many institutions - including particularly universities & private schools. And don’t believe that this is a 2 way process by which our ideas travel to and influence China.
The critical mass of students from mainland China are not absorbing what used to be our values - not least because we have abandoned so many of them in our educational institutions. And even if they did, they’d have barely a hope of making an impact on the values of the CCP.
As for Huawei, that the British government was willing even to contemplate working with a front for the Chinese state shows an astonishing disregard for our national security and the motives of our No. 1 strategic rival.
Obviously not. For the avoidance of doubt - that I didn’t think would be necessary - my entire point rests on the embarrassment he causes to supposedly free states by saying this when he quite clearly isn’t the leader of a liberal democratic state.
I really must cater for the mindless stupidity - or more likely fake credulity to make their obtuse points - of large numbers of Twitter users next time I tweet.