A friend reminded me to look at the data after Covid. Given that most of the deaths occurred in the elderly, seems that millennials gained some wealth during Covid. That said, we got even more debt, and some bad stuff like consumer credit. Silent gen went to Gen X + millennial?
Most are in equities (40.3trn)
Real estate is 34.9trn
Pensions are 31trn
Private business is 13.7trn
+ Others like durables.
Want to know what millennials own of the largest asset? 2%
Only 2% of total corporate equities & mutual funds. No change before/after Covid.
SPX rose almost 25% this year & our generation owns roughly 2% of total equity assets so we're basically so behind in asset valuation.
Let me show u what we have in wealth as a share of total for different assets end 2019 & Q2 2021.
This chart tells you that we own a lot of consumer durables, not enough real estate.
Actually, this area has plenty of growth as people are awakened by Covid to own some private property + starting family + thinking about old age.
Share rising but shockingly low for equities.
Share of assets rose across the board but abysmal for equities. That said, liabilities rose much faster in terms of share of ownership of debt. Look at consumer credit: under 40 has 40% of total consumer credit debt.
Yikes.
A high share of debt, especially consumer credit, but a low share of asset can only mean that under 40 generation VOTE differently than older generations that have more assets & less debt.
We're the lost generation. No wonder Bernie/socialism is popular.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This article in the FT doesn't make any sense. The author argues that Modi fails to create job for low-skilled people, esp labor-intensive manufacturing. It also faults Modi for its high-end growth (services, high-tech, infra, etc)
But then it ends with saying, well, don't bother to even develop manufacturing and just work on service exports.
Btw, all the critiques of India makes sense. The issue I have with Rajan and also Congress is their solutions.
They don't have one. Literally. Rajan tells India to forget about trying to do manufacturing & focuses on services.
India exports a lot of services. Manufacturing is the weak spot, not services!!! And if u want a lot of jobs, u need labor-intensive manufacturing.
A country with such a large population needs to growth via all sectors - services, manufacturing, agriculture etc. You can't leapfrog development & go to services.
India & the Philippines have tried that. Not working & hence need to include manufacturing & infrastructure building.
Who likes higher fuel prices in Asia??? Well, no one except Indonesia and Malaysia and by that I mean exporters.
The biggest deficit as a share of GDP goes to Thailand but mostly in LNG. Second is South Korea.
Obvs this is as a share of GDP. Higher fuel costs = higher import costs = someone has to pay for it & eg higher inflation or higher fiscal costs.
Who likes higher food prices? Well, a few - Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam and India. Obvs this is EXPORTERS only who gain. EM has high food as a share of consumption basket. But net food exporters have levers to pull. They can BAN exporting of food.
Who is most vulnerable? The Philippines. South Korea imports a lot too.
Putting food and fuel together as a share of GDP: Who is most exposed?
Well, South Korea and the Philippines. KRW doesn't like this news.
PHP doesn't like it. One caveat is that SK is much richer so can afford it more than say PH where this will hurt more.
Did you know that South Korea exports more to the US now than it does to China?
Actually, it isn't alone. A lot of Asian countries, due to supply chain reshuffling and also geopolitics and industrial policies, are exporting now more to US than China.
Why is South Korea doing more trade with a country far away than a country next door?
First, growth of exports to the US is faster than exports to China. In fact, China hasn't been importing much more and it is Korea that has been importing more from China for goods such as intermediate goods etc.
This has raised a big concern in Korea that China is a competitor & it's hard for SK to compete with its industrial policy and subsidies.
And so South Korea has 1 lever it can pull that is better than China - GEOPOLITICS. South Korea is an ally to the US. And as a country w/ a US FTA, it is being favored.
Whether it's the Chips Act or the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), the whole point is to exclude China.
Indonesia elects a new president in a week. The leading candidate is riding high on Jokonomics, or the continuation of his policy & popularity, as Jokowi's eldest son is VP.
Prabowo promises 8% average GDP growth or Jokonomics. How realistic & what is Jokonomics anyway?
While people believe that Prabowo is the best bet of doing more of what popular Jokowi has done for Indonesia in the past decade & he promises the highest growth, Jokowi 10-year only produced 4.2% GDP growth on average. Stripping out 2020 (Covid), it's 4.9%. No where near 8% 👈
Indonesia elects a new president next week to replace Jokowi. The leading candidate - Prabowo - is riding the president's coat tail as many hope that he is the best hope for continuation. But what is Jokonomics exactly? From 2014 to 2023, Indonesia grew on average 4.2% per yr👈.
If we strip out 2020, which economy contracted, then under Jokowi, the economy grew 4.9% on average (4.2% if we don't strip it out).
So that's sub 5%. In fact, GDP barely deviates from 5% level. So why do people think that Prabowo is the key to escape the middle income trap?
Pres Jokowi's biggest accomplishments come from the fiscal side. Indonesia got investment grade in 2017. By weaning Indonesia slowly off expensive energy subsides, the expenditure side was contained. And with the commodity boom, Indonesia fiscal positions were leaner than most.