Cynical optimism is like the barbell strategy here

Cynicism to protect short term downside (negative black swans)

Optimism to capture long term upside (positive black swans)
Works in nascent fields like crypto where going full 🦍 degen might lead to total ruin, but total cynicism will cause you to miss out on gains or sentiment shifts

The key is: Even if you don’t agree with the direction things are developing, you can bet against your beliefs
Be comfortable betting against your beliefs, because it’s almost impossible that society will converge on a Schelling Point that is optimal for you or even optimal for society.
Have optimism that in the long run, evolutionary pressures & human ingenuity will select for adaptations that lead to good-enough outcomes

But in the short term, there will be terribly-fit strategies that seem to work, but will eventually fail (you just don’t know when)
You don’t know exactly *what* is a good or bad adaptation. A bad strategy today might end up being fit tomorrow, a good strategy today might fail tomorrow… so be a cynical optimist

For today’s insufficiently advanced technology might look like magic tomorrow.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andric

Andric Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @astralwave

17 Nov
Say anything critical about the externalities of a certain group’s actions, and you’ll be labeled an X-phobe, where X is said group.

Your reputation will be tarnished as an out-group heretic, as if that matters, since filter bubbles have splintered into ever-so-small pieces.
The irony is that the group doesn’t realize only an out-group member can comment on externalities.

If you “cancel” voices external to your filter bubble (well, filter them out), maybe you can feel psychologically safe 🙉 in thinking your actions are completely moral.
It’s worth noting that the group can be any group. I’ve seen this dynamic play out across various groups.

Name anything that exists in this world, and as long as a subreddit exists for it, you can bet someone’s been cancelled for voicing perfectly sane thoughts.
Read 9 tweets
16 Nov
DAOs make it possible to coordinate globally, like an Internet-native limited-liability partnership.

But it seems to be incomplete: right now it depends on good faith & trust. What it’s lacking are legal concepts (liability, partnership, fiduciary duties, ownership)
If smart contracts execute on a “runtime”, legal contracts execute on a jurisdiction.

The key here is that the jurisdictions are *separate* from the contracts.

Aragon Courts are a good start.
I hear talk of DAOs replacing VC partnerships, or even firms.

But firms are not just a cap table and a governance structure (i.e. the board & shareholders), they exist in a larger context of a legal jurisdiction.

A fish needs water to swim in, a planet needs an atmosphere.
Read 5 tweets
11 Nov
DAOs need their “Silk Road” moment.

Will be good to establish baseline expectations for the naïvely optimistic, as well as the ignorant.

Every new technology faces a reckoning, when society begins to understand its potential danger.
Before COVID, it was easy to be laissez-faire about gain of function research.

Before Hiroshima & Nagasaki, the atomic bomb.

Before Chernobyl, nuclear power.

Before Tahrir Square, social media.

Before Silk Road, Bitcoin.

Before BitConnect, ICOs.
When people dismiss the hype around “web3” (NFTs, DAOs, DeFi), they’re dismissing technologies that don’t yet have their Silk Road moment

This is rational behavior

Once the other edge of the sword becomes apparent, markets usually correct & technologies go into a long “winter”
Read 9 tweets
10 Nov
This is definitely something I’ve observed in tech startups.

Startups have so much leverage thanks to the power of software, and the presently high familiarity & penetration of mobile computing + the Web.

But most of this leverage is heavily misapplied & constrained by Capital.
Not talking about financial leverage here, of course, but intellectual leverage.

What a small insight & a little code can do to change lives at a large scale.

But if it doesn’t fit into the OKR & investment thesis, good luck trying to do it.

Procrustean Bed?
Why so much of this “small insight & little code” lives on the fringes of the Web in open source software, small indie shops, and early startups (before GPs’ investment theses corrupts product strategy).

It’s not “coordination headwinds”, it’s the Principal-Agent Problem.
Read 14 tweets
9 Nov
This “Gen Z is special” nonsense reminds me of the “Millennials are special” nonsense that I’d come across while growing up. Generational categories are arbitrary at best.

Every generation seems rebellious, naïve, “creative” etc when in fact it is just a product of youth.
So useless is the discourse about the “generations”, that you could look up stories about previous “generations”, when they were younger, and those descriptors would equally apply to the youth of today.
Such discourse is always (predictably) talked about in the same breath as – and misattributed to the influences of – the information technologies, media, and culture of the times.
Read 4 tweets
2 Nov
@m1guelpf Totally. What smart contracts let us do is the “adjacent possible” from Bitcoin and so everything feels like novel mutations that haven’t found their footing yet. Give it time and problems will emerge for which these technologies will be a perfect fit.
@m1guelpf “Paradigm shift” is a bit of a hopeful prediction though, I don’t think technological shifts happen so linearly and can be predicted. We only see these shifts in hindsight.

Before iPhone native apps gained ground, for instance, everyone thought HTML5 apps would be the future.
@m1guelpf Right now, trying out web3 tech to see how they fit different domains *should* be encouraged, that’s how the technology finds its legs.

The “paradigm shift” you speak of comes after, when this knowledge is already discovered, and we mine the depths of it.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(