Facebook says top content on its platform comes from reputable sources like UNICEF, ABC News & the CDC.

But our #CitizenBrowser data shows that sensational partisan content from Daily Wire & The Western Journal are top performers. @corintxt reports:

themarkup.org/citizen-browse…
Here’s the difference: Facebook measures “reach” - which is how many unique viewers saw each domain.

But we measured an equally, if not more important metric, “impressions” – which is how many times a piece of content is bombarded at users. /2
Measuring impressions shows a starkly different picture of what is popular on Facebook.

Using that metric, mainstream sites like UNICEF & USA Today drop off the popular list, and The Daily Wire & Fox News jump up the list. /3 Image
When asked about our metrics, Facebook spokeswoman said the company plans to ‘refine and improve’ its reports but did not say whether the company would eventually include impressions in its quarterly “Widely Viewed Content” reports. /4
One important thing we learned doing this research was that our Citizen Browser panel, while small, is actually a fairly representative sample of Facebook.

We found that, measured by reach, the most popular domains shown to our panel matched those in Facebook’s own data. /5
Data scientist @mynameisfiber used a metric called Kendall-Tau c-rank correlation to see how comparable our most popular list was to Facebook’s list. We found a strong correlation. /6 Image
@mynameisfiber also tested our data using another metric, the Spearman correlation coefficient, to show the similarity between the number of unique users seeing each domain.

Again we saw a strong correlation. /7 Image
This analysis allows us to conclude that our data is a good match to the released Facebook data and that our sample is sufficient for statistical relevance.

This is important given that Facebook has in the past claimed that our sample size was too small. /8
As always, we show our work and release our data. /9

github.com/the-markup/cit…

themarkup.org/show-your-work…
And in an extra-special bonus, we are releasing a Twitter bot that will tweet out daily lists of the sites shown most frequently to our Citizen Browser panelists, and the sites with the greatest increase when ranked by impressions.

Follow our bot here! @citizenbrowser

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Julia Angwin

Julia Angwin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JuliaAngwin

21 Oct
Nonprofits are exempt from many state privacy laws. But should they be?

We scanned 23,000+ nonprofit sites and found they were heavily tracking visitors. Planned Parenthood was even monitoring visitor keystrokes.

@alfredwkng & @tenuous report:

themarkup.org/blacklight/202…
@alfredwkng @tenuous We scanned nonprofits using the real-time privacy forensics tool that @suryamattu built — Blacklight.

Try it yourself on your favorite websites. You might be surprised at what you find:

themarkup.org/blacklight
@alfredwkng @tenuous @suryamattu Planned Parenthood assured us that they didn’t “sell” data, but didn’t dispute that they share it with third parties.

Here’s a little primer from @alfredwkng on that false distinction: themarkup.org/ask-the-markup…
Read 4 tweets
9 Apr
🧵: Yesterday we revealed how YouTube enabled advertisers to build ad campaigns around hate terms.

Today we reveal how YouTube blocked advertisers from building ad campaigns around social justice terms such as “Black Lives Matter.”

themarkup.org/google-the-gia…
2/ @leonyin and @asankin found that YouTube’s ad portal blocked search results for one-third of the 62 racial & social justice phrases tested.

For example: All the phrases we tested containing the word “Muslim” were blocked, even innocuous ones like Muslim fashion.
3/ Google would not comment on its blocked racial and social justice terms. But after we reached out, Google EXPANDED the block list to include ADDITIONAL terms including:

icantbreathe
black excellence
civil rights
racial justice
say her name
Read 5 tweets
8 Apr
🧵: We found a secret blocklist on Google Ads that hides YouTube hate videos. But @leonyin and @asankin found it was full of holes.

Blocked: heil hitler
Not blocked: heilhitler

Blocked: white nationalist
Not blocked: white nationalists
themarkup.org/google-the-gia…
2/ Many hate terms weren’t blocked in YouTube’s ad buying portal at all. We tested 86 well-known hate terms and phrases, and only one-third were blocked. Unblocked terms included:

14 words
Blood and soil
Daily Stormer
Great replacement
Zionist occupation government
3/ Nearly every term blocked by YouTube’s list was easily evaded by removing spaces between words or pluralizing singular nouns. Experts such as @MeganSquire0 and @nandoodles told us that this wasn’t the best way to build a block list.
Read 6 tweets
31 Jan
There’s been a lot of chatter on my feed about Facebook Oversight Board’s decision to release its ruling to some journalists and academics on embargo.

I thought it would be worth talking about how newsrooms can and should think about embargoes. /1
First, to address the obvious question: yes, embargoes are a PR manipulation tactic.

When you accept embargoed material, you usually cannot do what journalists normally do, which is consult experts about it. /2
Sometimes that trade-off makes sense – particularly if it is a story in which you have enough expertise to provide the proper context.

But often the trade-off means that you are missing outside voices that could have shaped the coverage. /3
Read 10 tweets
5 Jan
Facebook is a newstand. But no one can see which news Facebook is pushing to the top.

So we built an app for that called #CitizenBrowser. Our first finding: the sharp impact of Facebook’s political ad ban reversal in the Georgia Senate elections.
themarkup.org/citizen-browse… /1
This is the first report from our #CitizenBrowser project. There will be many more to come. But first, I want to tell you a bit about how we did it because it’s the most ambitious thing we’ve ever done @themarkup – and we do a lot of ambitious projects. /2
#CitizenBrowser grew out of conversations @suryamattu and I had about how to audit Facebook. We had both worked on browser extensions to collect data from Facebook, but FB always threatened to shut those down, just like their recent threats against the NYU AdObservatory. /3
Read 13 tweets
7 Dec 20
I’m excited to announce that we have assembled a fantastic team to help us get Citizen Browser launched! Citizen Browser is our ambitious effort to build a national panel to audit social media algorithms: themarkup.org/citizen-browser /1
@corintxt joins the team as Data Reporter - he will be digging through the data to help us find stories. Corin has long worked as a reporter covering technology news. I love this story outing pay-for-play crypto news outlets: breakermag.com/we-asked-crypt… /2
@angiewaller joins the team as Tech Coordinator - she is supporting our panelists & developers. Angie recently finished a masters in Computational Linguistics from @GC_CUNY. Her thesis analyzed objectifying comments in professor reviews: angiewaller.com/detecting-attr…. /3
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(