Back in 2014, a pair of political scientists published a study of 1,779 US "policy issues" over 20 years, concluding that elected officials make policy to benefit the richest ten percent of the country to the exclusion of the needs of everyone else.

cambridge.org/core/journals/… 1/ A generic pill bottle spilling out a pile of pills on a blac
If you'd like an unrolled version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

pluralistic.net/2021/11/18/bip… 2/
This was true irrespective of whether there was mass pressure from citizen groups. In the USA, politicians make sure that richest ten percent get whatever they want and do nothing for the rest of us. 3/
I find this study incredibly depressing and do my best to keep it out of my mind. After all, while this is true in *nearly* every case, we all know about instances in which policy supported the many and not the few. 4/
The formation of the FTC and EPA was not the product of a fallen civilization in possession of lost and unfathomnable technology. 5/
So I soldier on, telling myself "This isn't the kind of fight we win, it's the kind of fight we fight" (as the epigraph from my 2019 collection *Radicalized* has it), but every now and then, well... Ugh. 6/
The Democrats set to kill pharma price controls in the #BuildBackBetter plan.

khn.org/news/article/d… 7/
Americans pay 300% more for their medicine than people outside of the USA. 95% of Democrats want Medicare to negotiate drug prices (that's right, the US government *doesn't negotiate the price it pays for drugs*) (seriously). 8/
82% of independents support Medicare drug-price negotiations. 71% of Republicans support this, too.

It's not just Medicare. 84% of Americans support price-caps on drugs used to treat chronic illness (think: insulin):

rwjf.org/en/library/res… 9/
93% of Americans think that pharma companies will still be able to fund drug research with these measures in place (90% of Republicans agree). They're obviously right, because the bulk of critical pharma R&D is paid for by the USG, not pharma.

khn.org/news/article/p… 10/
And yet. The latest Build Back Better pharma proposal is basically a nothingburger in a my-eyes-glaze-over bun of bureaucratic nonsense. 11/
In the current proposal, Uncle Sucker will be allowed to choose up to ten drugs per year (or as few as zero drugs per year) to negotiate prices on. Not just any drugs: those ten (or zero) drugs must have been on the market for at least 13 years.

Then...nothing happens. 12/
Until 2025, when the controls kick in. If the new Senate, Congress and presidential administration decide to make them stick. 13/
And since the Dems are not delivering any benefit to the American people until after the next presidential election, the politicians who supported this measure won't be able to campaign on its benefits to win re-election and ensure it actually takes effect. 14/
Why is this bullshit the best we can get? Why were the incredibly popular, stronger versions of this measure not a slam dunk? 15/
It's really uncomplicated. The pharma industry bribes key Democrats to block it.

For example, @SenatorSinema campaigned on drug-price controls. Then pharma gave her $100,000. Then she killed a House proposal that would have lowered the prices Medicare pays for 250 drugs. 16/
94% of Arizona voters supported the measure. She killed it for the price of new Mercedes SUV.

Then there's @SenatorMenendez, whose state (NJ) includes 13 of the 20 largest pharma manufacturers. 17/
And @RepScottPeters, whose San Diego district is also heavy with pharma companies. Their *constituents* want lower drug prices. Their corporate donors don't.

You and the people you love might die because of this. 18/
The country will throw billions to the pharma industry as a result of it. The lobbying bill for @PhRMA, whose bribes account for those bodies and those billions? A mere $23m so far in 2021.

washingtonpost.com/business/2021/…

It's a goddamned steal. 19/
We know the names of the executives, lobbyists and politicians who took pennies that cost us billions while we died in our droves. We won't forget. Someday, there has to be a reckoning.

I mean, doesn't there? 20/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Cory Doctorow COW-SHICKER MENTALITY

Cory Doctorow COW-SHICKER MENTALITY Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @doctorow

19 Nov
Today's Twitter threads (a Twitter thread).

Inside: Teamsters transformed; and more!

Archived at: pluralistic.net/2021/11/19/hof…

#Pluralistic 1/ Image
Teamsters transformed: Militant labor is strong labor.

2/ Image
#20yrsago Walt Disney World gets wifi web.archive.org/web/2002020509…

#5yrsago The Snoopers Charter is now law in the UK: “extreme surveillance” rules the land theguardian.com/world/2016/nov… 3/ Image
Read 16 tweets
19 Nov
It's one (true) thing to say that American union membership is down - that's a quantifiable, objective proposition. It's another to say that American unions are weak - and contrariwise, that unions are getting stronger. That's a lot more abstract and harder to pin down. 1/ A 1952 Teamsters Union card...
If you'd like an unrolled version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

pluralistic.net/2021/11/19/hof… 2/
But here's a concrete version of what it means for a union to be weak, and for it to be getting stronger: the Teamsters election, hereclutch of do-nothing, sellout lifers were ousted from their cushy offices by militant challengers who made specific, meaningful promises. 3/
Read 18 tweets
18 Nov
Today's Twitter threads (a Twitter thread).

Inside: This is your Congress on drugs; Harvard is full of rich, white low-achievers; and more!

Archived at: pluralistic.net/2021/11/18/bip…

#Pluralistic 1/
Today (Thu), I'll be appearing on @Article19org's EU webinar on the Digital Services Act and interoperability (0830PT):

zoom.us/webinar/regist…

And hosting the launch for @happierman and @J9andIf's "You Feel It Just Below the Ribs" (1200PT):

keplers.org/upcoming-event… 2/
This is your Congress on drugs: Corruption kills.

3/
Read 23 tweets
18 Nov
Harvard is a very, very selective school. Only 3.43% of applicants get in. But that's not the whole story. Writing in @TheGuardian, Tayo Bero says that 43% of the white student body was admitted on criteria other than merit.

theguardian.com/commentisfree/… 1/ The Harvard crest with a pair of crossed silver spoons benea
If you'd like an unrolled version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

pluralistic.net/2021/11/18/bip… 2/
Those 43% are ALDCs: athletes, legacies, dean's interest list (children of major donors) or children (of Harvard faculty). Three quarters of ALDCs do not have the grades to be admitted to Harvard on their own merit. 3/
Read 5 tweets
18 Nov
HEATHERS (1988) dir. Michael Lehmann wilwheaton.tumblr.com/post/668166071…
HEATHERS (1988) dir. Michael Lehmann wilwheaton.tumblr.com/post/668166071…
HEATHERS (1988) dir. Michael Lehmann wilwheaton.tumblr.com/post/668166071…
Read 7 tweets
17 Nov
Today's Twitter threads (a Twitter thread).

Inside: Aspiration's comprehensively deceptive greenwashing; Live Nation is to blame for the Astroworld deaths; and more!

Archived at: pluralistic.net/2021/11/17/do-…

#Pluralistic 1/
Tomorrow (Thu), I'll be appearing on @Article19org's EU webinar on the Digital Services Act and interop (0830PT):

zoom.us/webinar/regist…

And hosting the launch for @happierman and J9andIf's "You Feel It Just Below the Ribs" (1200PT):

keplers.org/upcoming-event… 2/
Aspiration's comprehensively deceptive greenwashing: It's "do well" OR "do good."

3/
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(