David R Tomlinson 🇺🇦💙 Profile picture
Nov 18, 2021 11 tweets 7 min read Read on X
@WHO director of communications suggests that we need 'a consensus on terminology'; i.e. meaning of the word 'airborne'.

Logical possibilities:

1. She's right: 'airborne' has so many meanings as to render its use invalid.

2. She's wrong: 'airborne' has a single, clear meaning.
🚨 Dictionary evidence

Does this indicate multiple, potentially conflicting meanings, or a single, clear meaning?
🚨 Evidence from WHO teams' use

2014: IPC of epidemic & pandemic-prone acute respiratory infections in health care

'The spread of an infectious agent caused by the dissemination of droplet nuclei that remain infectious when suspended in air over long distances and time. (9)'
🚨 Reference 9 from the 2014 WHO IPC guideline: source

@Don_Milton: when writing this 2004 perspective piece triggered by proven airborne transmission of SARS, DID NOT seek to question the meaning of the word 'airborne'.

And in 2014, WHO teams were happy using it too.
🚨 July 2020 SARS2 IPC Scientific Brief

'Airborne transmission is defined as the spread of an infectious agent caused by the dissemination of droplet nuclei (aerosols) that remain infectious when suspended in air over long distances & time.(11)'

'aerosols' = only diff from 2014
🚨 Reference 11: source?

The 2014 IPC of epidemic & pandemic-prone acute respiratory infections in health care: WHO Guideline

Getting boring isn't it?

WHO teams are soooo comfortable with their use of the word 'airborne' w.r.t. IPC, that they keep quoting their own definition.
🚨 SARS-CoV-2 & the role of airborne transmission: a systematic review (v2, 6th Sept 2021)

[You know, the one sponsored by WHO & denying airborne transmission, rejected due to reviewer concerns over flawed methodology.]

Link:
f1000research.com/articles/10-23…
🚨 'Airborne transmission is defined as the spread of an infectious agent caused by the dissemination of droplet nuclei (aerosols) that remain infectious when suspended in air over long distances & time(1).

IDENTICAL to the July 2020 Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Scientific Brief
@gabbystern I respectfully suggest that the evidence above demonstrates a consensus on 'airborne' terminology dating back to 2004, with WHO teams consistently using near identical wording in multiple publications, most recently Sept 6th 2021.
Given this consensus:

'Airborne transmission is defined as the spread of an infectious agent caused by the dissemination of droplet nuclei (aerosols) that remain infectious when suspended in air over long distances & time'

WHY suggest the need for 'a consensus on terminology'?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David R Tomlinson 🇺🇦💙

David R Tomlinson 🇺🇦💙 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DRTomlinsonEP

Sep 30
Incredible testimony** today @covidinquiryuk

Sir Frank Atherton 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Chief Medical Officer

‘Healthcare leadership has lost its way. Its foundation should be in love, not lies. We are truly sorry for what we have done’

** ‘testimony’ 🙃

/🧵 Image
‘We knew SARS2 transmission was airborne in Jan 2020, but instead of showing love to healthcare workers & being honest with them about the RPE shortages, we lied to them & kept on lying’

‘…we are truly sorry for what we have done’

/2 Image
We knew AGP-only aerosol risk was a smokescreen - a thinly disguised rationing tool for RPE - but instead of being honest with HCWs, in love, we lied to them & kept on lying’

‘…we are truly sorry for what we have done’

/3 Image
Read 5 tweets
Sep 26
If you missed what Prof Sir Chris Whitty said on IPC & PPE, or just couldn't carry on watching after the amazing @Kevin_Fong [God bless you sir, & thank you for all you do 🙏]

TL/DR

/1 JVT early 2021 in a vaccination centre - his personal 'covid green' risk assessment => FFP2. All other HCWs in FRSM as per national IPC guidance. JVT knows his AGPs
Sir Chris worked shifts on the wards in every wave

Wore FRSM mainly - as per IPC guidance, he said

HCID declassification had no bearing on IPC guidance

"I am not an expert on IPC'

/2 Image
On national IPC guidance:

'quite a lot of people had partial responsibility'

Q: Who was ultimately responsible?

A: The IPC Cell

/3
Read 9 tweets
Sep 19
Now we've seen IPC Cell minutes from 22/12/2020 & the plea from 'CB' for wider FFP3 use because:

'Our understanding of aerosol transmission has changed'

🚨Would you like to know whether very late 2020 was when *all* 🇬🇧Gov departments knew of the importance of aerosol risk?

/1 Image
Obtained via FOI request

🚨From the Department of Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy

🦺Working safely during coronavirus (COVID-19)
10 July 2020 update

'You should ensure that steps are taken to avoid people needing to unduly raise their voices to each other...

/2 Image
'This includes...refraining from playing music or broadcasts that may encourage shouting, including if played at a volume that makes normal conversation difficult. This is because of the potential for increased risk of transmission, particularly from aerosol transmission.’

/3 Image
Read 8 tweets
Sep 18
Over the last 2 days at @covidinquiryuk the NHS has shown its dark & ugly side

There was never going to be an apology from IPC guidance authors whose guidance drove disproportionately high rates of death & COVID19 in non-ICU HCWs & huge rates of nosocomial SARS2, but…

/1
the level of obfuscation, evasion & incompetence on display from those tasked with keeping HCWs safe, is jaw dropping

I was one of the lucky ones: my NHS Trust ALWAYS provided HCWs with FFP3 when caring for those with COVID19 - my IPC remained precautionary

As a result…

/2
by Dec 2020 the number of consultant staff working on Covid wards testing positive was: 0

🚨The ONLY deviation from national guidance was universal FFP3!

The last & most vital line of defence - FFP3 - *is life saving* @SMHopkins

How does this compare with other units?

/3
Read 18 tweets
Dec 18, 2023
'I would like to highlight evidence demonstrating that Professor Heneghan may be in breach of Section 35(2) of the Inquiries Act 2005'

Am looking forward to hearing your response @carlheneghan

covid19.public-inquiry.uk/documents/inq0…
TL/DR in evidence to @covidinquiryuk, CH stated SARS2 transmission is via large droplet & fomites

But:

Following peer review triggered changes 6 Jul 2022, CH's own work stated that SARS2 transmission is via 'fine aerosols & respiratory droplets, & to a lesser extent...fomites'
Why omit the empirical truth that SARS2 transmission occurs importantly via the airborne [aerosol inhalation] route?

Why do this, particularly as David Heymann's 13th Oct 2023 evidence to the PI clarified the @WHO position:

WHO knew SARS2 transmission was via aerosols, Jan 2020
Read 8 tweets
Oct 13, 2023
🚨David Halpern Cabinet Office

'Arguably the most fundamental misstep in the UK response was the presumption that covid would be an unstoppable flu-like wave'

This

underpinned the early (Chris Whitty) position on T&T, & the Vallance view on 'herd immunity' (later air-brushed)' Image
Aside

Early SAGE minutes clarify the UK rationale for stopping community SARS2 testing: it was deemed unnecessary because with rapidly increasing case numbers there was no point in testing, as there were insufficient personnel to contact trace

Good to know whose plan this was
'But there was an alternative'

'This led us to question...though we found ourselves quietly dismissed as not understanding the science'

'Ironically, the pride in our science & our capabilities, slowed our ability to learn lessons from other countries'

/2 Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(