Post

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
Click again on or Share Via icon
Click on Copy Link to Tweet
Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
More info at Twitter Help

Margot Cleveland

Nov 18, 2021 • 12 tweets • 5 min read • Read on X

Scrolly

THREAD: Delaware County, PA lawsuit has many more details beyond the whistleblower videos I posted last night. Posting several excerpts until complaint is live.

https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1461152992443486213

2/ Here are the videos from last night, to refresh your recollection.

https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1461152992443486213

https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1461153986506117125

https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1461153986506117125

https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1461154558458146817

https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1461154558458146817

5/ Starting to get good:

9/ Five State Law Claims:

10/ Of note, no federal claims, which easily could have been alleged based on facts alleged of violation of EP, right to vote, and conspiracy to violate constitution. Likely to force the case to stay in the state court system. More lawsplaining tomorrow, but reason

11/11 videos provided yesterday, which were also filed with court as exhibits, is clear. Folks can "get" "It's a felony." Wading through the minutia of 91 pages of a detailed complaint that is more law & violations of election law than incriminating statements loses people.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @ProfMJCleveland

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

Mar 15

https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1899243213849792979

🚨THREAD: Earlier this week Judge Ali (judge who ordered Trump to pay some $2 billion in contracts w/i 36 hours to have that order stayed by Roberts & then told by court to be more clear on who to pay & reasonable on time), entered a preliminary injunction as noted below.1/

https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1899243213849792979

2/ At time, I said order was confusing & in part merely ordered Trump to comply with law, but nonetheless said I expected immediate appeal. Well, gov't has filed status report saying still deciding on whether to immediately appeal and/or seek stay. Why? B/c they don't

3/ read order as really tying their hands. As status report explains, they are reviewing and paying for past work and since they would be doing that any way, absent court enter a pay now order, Trump can just plod ahead.

Read 10 tweets

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

Mar 14

🚨🚨🚨💣BREAKING: Fourth Circuit grants Trump Administration stay.

2/ This was case Court held hearing on earlier today about the DEI clause in contracts. So will they need to execute contracts as is?storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

https://x.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1893109377185259766

3/ Here's the underlying background.

https://x.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1893109377185259766

Read 4 tweets

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

Mar 14

🔥Hearing to start at 3 on claims by Plaintiffs of widespread violation of injunction barring DEI EO. 1/

2/ Case: courtlistener.com/docket/6960784…

3/ Hearing beginning: Noting merely a scheduling conference and not an evidentiary hearing so sounds like he's trying to get handle on it. Asking for 3 things:
1) Baltimore has received notice to certify non-DEI in gov' contract which claims is in violation of order; 2) seek compliance plan b/c systemic failure & idea of how to get to compliance b/c people are suffering; not sure what #3 is. Judge says don't get into now--what do you want. Baltimore wants ruling today; compliance & remediation do a briefing as court asks.

Read 9 tweets

Margot Cleveland

@ProfMJCleveland

Mar 14

🚨🚨🚨OMGosh...TDS is making judges ignore diff. b/w "restraining order" to maintain status quo & an injunction requiring affirmative action? THIS order is NOT a "restraining order": It is an injunction masquerading as a TRO which makes it immediately appealable. 1/

2/ This case is the second one on probationary employees, with this order actually requiring reinstatement. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

https://x.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1900317699554549837

3/ Yesterday's reporting that court ordered reinstatement is possibly inaccurate as the only written order extended TRO which didn't order reinstatement. Not sure if oral order did, but government said court entered Preliminary Injunction. THREADS on that: