"As a second step in and test case for our program to find a canonical form for a general linear mapping, we look at linear mappings N: V → V which have only one distinct eigen value λ with multiplicity n=dim(V)."
Why do i need to go through this? 😭😭😭😭
"There are two reasons for considering nilpotent mappings." Orly
1 "since there is only one distinct eigen value to deal with, we will be able to see much more clearly exactly what our canonical form should look like in this case"
2 "we will see in the next section that the general case may be reduced to this one, so all the ideas introduced here will be useful later as well."
OR we could simply not prove JCF?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Excited to report i have improved my piano skills?? I know it sounds obvious that practice leads to improvement but I've got this brain.
Anyway one of the reasons i always Feel Bad is that even like much easier pieces than ones i know take forever for me to learn
And last time i was playing piano semi regularly i bought the sheet music for Charlie Brown's Christmas but Linus and Lucy was still impossible for me timing wise.
I have a question for trans people willing to answer.
Background is that I'm learning how different types of oppression lead to different ways of navigating.
The fact that Black kids generally grow up in Black families, knowing they're Black, makes racism different from homophobic, transphobia, and ableism, for instance.
I'm in groups for autistics and parents of autistic kids and I've found that while they combat ableism there's definitely a desire not to push allistic parents out.
right now i feel like we are watching a new white supremacist organization being born, and as annoying as that is, what is causing me physical discomfort is the confused white people.
has this already happened? a new organization/institution where it is known from the Beginning that it's effed and people are like oh idk they haven't said anything bad etc.
Okay so Kirby's essay is so frickin wordy and honestly makes me feel a little sick to have to read it for a quote. This time around i read the header about why it was published on his site.
AMS notices said no unless a specific anecdote was removed. Then this:
"The Newsletter of the AWM did not have the space, (but suggested a short letter referring to this article), so electronic publication in this form seemed to be the best alternative."