Honestly what the fuck is wrong with these people.
Earlier this year conservatives were fighting the Seuss estate for updating their racial awareness from 1950 and now they’re fighting Sesame Street over basic public health.

Like what even the fuck is wrong with them? Never mind the shitty policy. It’s so embarrassing.
The big tent party of small limited government going to war with Dora the Explorer because of her “woke” scolding of swipes, and burning their cardigan sweaters because Mr. Rogers asked us to be kind.
5 billion articles about how Democrats need to stop talking about racism or they’ll lose centrist voters, none of whom apparently are ever in danger of leaving Republicans for yelling at Big Bird about preventing the spread of a deadly virus.
Their hero is a militia shooter who killed a couple guys and they pick fights with Muppets. Their members play cartoons of themselves murdering other members.

When is our media going to stop pretending these are serious people?

At long last, what the fuck is wrong with them?
They’re not a political party. They aren’t the opposition. They’re a bunch of idiot reactionary thugs without the moral compass or the emotional maturity of a badly spoiled 3-year old.

They’re the pull-the-wings-off-flies party. What the fuck?
I say this with all seriousness, if you’re a Republican, people who still have a sense of basic human decency are going to judge you harshly and they’re going to be right.
I’m aware they’re doing it to get a rise out of people of good will by targeting innocuous and simple statements of decency and social cohesion, but get this—that actually makes it even worse.

You vote for grade-school bullies to keep your taxes low? Fuck yourselves.
I don’t care how they feel about it, or whether they care. Those things don’t matter. We have to judge them harshly all the same, because what they’ve chosen to become must face harsh judgement, if we hope to preserve all the good that they intend to destroy.
I think we all know why they included Bert and Ernie.
Honestly what the fuck is wrong with these people.
Honestly what the fuck is wrong with these people.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with A.R. Moxon

A.R. Moxon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JuliusGoat

19 Nov
But by beating Republicans in elections don’t Democrats risk losing the very centrist swing voters whose support they’ll need to win the next elections?
This is why I, a senior Republican election strategist providing Democrats with election strategy in the paper of record, strongly recommend that Democrats lose all their elections; if they insist on winning some elections, they’ll surely pay for it the next election cycle.
By losing all their elections, Democrats will send a clear signal that they are willing to compromise on the issues centrist voters value, such as whether or not Democrats should be allowed to win elections. Complete surrender is the only path that can carry Democrats to victory.
Read 6 tweets
16 Nov
I’ve been told I haven’t followed the Kyle trial closely enough. It’s true; and as a result my comments haven’t touched much on the details. I’m tired. Very tired of yet another meticulous cataloging of why actually a white autocracy-loving dude killing people is actually good.
I’m pretty new to this awareness of how good it actually is to our power structures whenever a white dude kills somebody. It’s always actually VERY good. Every time.

I can only imagine how tired people are who’ve had no choice but to deal with this knowledge their whole lives.
It’s always actually SO good, guys. Every time. If the guy loves autocracy, it is always magnificently good that he killed whoever he killed, b/c of whatever facts surround the killings and whatever we discover about the not-living people, who aren’t victims b/c they deserved it.
Read 11 tweets
16 Nov
I got called “a Rainn Wilson looking guy” by a stranger today who didn’t think I was listening or didn’t care, and I’m taking it as a compliment.
I actually look even more like Nate Barghetze.
Read 4 tweets
14 Nov
Future generations in coming decades are going to sift through the documentary evidence of whatever remains of this country and wonder why we didn’t immediately remove all Republicans from power, given their goals, intentions, actions, and words.
It’s what needs to happen.

Sorry if that’s disruptive. Maybe you’ll also find being forced to be converted to evangelical Christianity at the point of a gun disruptive, too.
I know an immediate purge from power of every Republican would be disruptive.

Nazis taking power are disruptive, too.
Read 17 tweets
11 Nov
This seems like a good idea. How about I thread them right here?
First of all: You can get an archive of all previous newsletters in the links at the bottom of the sign-up page, here.

getrevue.co/profile/julius…
Both Sides, Part 1: Name The Two Sides

"On one side, there are the people who are directly affected by the issue, who speak to the harm caused by it from the perspective of their lived experience; and on the other side, there are those who are not."

getrevue.co/profile/julius…
Read 6 tweets
11 Nov
One thing that the Rittenhouse trial throws into stark relief is a strongly held belief among a huge percentage of white conservatives that people protesting for Black lives should be killed, and that white conservatives should be allowed to personally do it.
They are protecting their right to self-defense as exclusive to white conservatives.

No white conservative with a gun can ever be deemed a threat worthy of self defense.

The immediate danger they clearly pose must always be deemed pre-facto AND post-facto self-defense.
They are protecting their right to pre-and-post justification of any threat they pose and any violent act they commit, their right to frame their violence and only their violence as self defense, their fear and only their fear of bodily threat as valid.

Your body. Their choice.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(