Senator Johnson says that those responsible for securing the Capitol, including congressional leadership, embraced the false narrative of 'thousands of armed insurrectionists' on J6 to cover their own failure. @SenRonJohnson@cspanc-span.org/video/?c498744…
@SenRonJohnson@cspan .@SenRonJohnson ‘I asked her [FBI Assistant Director Jill Sanborn] – again, ‘thousands of armed insurrectionists’ – I asked her, well, how many firearms were confiscated either on the Capitol grounds or the Capitol?' ...
@SenRonJohnson@cspan "'... I didn’t know what the answer was going to be, for all I knew it was going to be 300. She [FBI Assistant Director Sanborn] said zero. Kind of a mike-drop moment. Sort of laid waste to the narrative of ‘thousands of armed insurrectionists,'" said @SenRonJohnson.
@SenRonJohnson@cspan Why was the false narrative 'adopted so easily on a bipartisan basis?' @SenRonJohnson: 'they didn’t have an adequate plan...Capitol Police leadership, the Sergeant at Arms, the Congressional leadership – those that were responsible for securing the Capitol in that situation ...."
'...they get let off the hook if the narrative takes hold that there were thousands of armed insurrectionists.... On a bipartisan basis, this works for a lot of people, so that’s why ... that false narrative took hold. That’s one of the reasons I was trying to push back on it...'
Whether it's the January 6 violence, COVID, or damage from the vaccines, many people are "resistant" and "afraid of the truth," to the point where they want to "limit" freedom of speech, @SenRonJohnson
says in his interview with us. @cspanc-span.org/video/?c498790…
@SenRonJohnson@cspan Senator Johnson's investigators viewed Capitol Police surveillance videos of January 6 and found that the police opened doors on the Capitol's west terrace to let someone out, allowing about 300 people to walk in. "No violence associated with any of them." c-span.org/video/?c498791…
Waller: "The lead [J6] investigators on this don’t want those facts that disrupt their narrative. They’re not interested in them."
Senator Johnson likens his J6 investigative methodology to historical reconstruction of a Civil War battle: "Where were the points of conflict? How many people were engaged in those points of conflict? How long did it last?" He lays this out in a timeline form.
Sen Johnson: "my investigators noticed that there was a West Terrace door that was opened.…Capitol Police allowed somebody to exit through those doors, we don’t still don’t know who exited. Once the door was opened, over 300 people streamed in. No violence associated with them."
.@SenRonJohnson: "... They just came into the Capitol. My guess is those certainly were some of the people that were walking and staying in the rope lines ... you wouldn’t think armed insurrectionists would respect the velvet rope lines. But they were."
@SenRonJohnson Some must keep their narrative against all facts, @SenRonJohnson says. "It just doesn’t get shown in the mainstream media. You’ve got to look at alternate sites. You’ve got to go to @TuckerCarlson…. And there’s threats to take him off Fox News. People are afraid of the truth."
CYA: "the breach of the United States Capitol was not the result of poor planning or failure to contain a demonstration gone wrong.
"an insurrection of thousands of armed, violent, and coordinated individuals focused on breaching a building at all costs." hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…
Capitol Police Chief Sund testified that his intelligence unit chief was "an expert in right-wing extremism" and that the force received pre-J6 reports from FBI, Secret Service, Homeland Security, & DC Police. "Proud Boys, white supremacist groups, Antifa" & more were expected.
Senator Johnson on @TuckerCarlson's documentary: "it did confirm parts of your eyewitness account, where you were saying that the crowd was there kind of milling about, and it wasn’t really until they [the US Capitol Police] started firing tear gas...." c-span.org/video/?c498791…
"... First of all, the crowd was very puzzled by it, according to testimony, it’s like, ‘What are you doing? We’re your friends. We’re not a threat.’ And that [tear gas] seemed to rile the crowd. You can kind of see where there was maybe an initial surge of people," Johnson said.
.@SenRonJohnson: "And maybe those agent provocateurs that you were talking about. And there’s a separation, everyone else was back there, and saying, ‘Don’t go … don’t go on the Capitol.’"
@SenRonJohnson More J6 observations from @SenRonJohnson in above video: "But then there were some people up on the tower going, ‘Forward,’ in your eyewitness account, ‘Do not retreat.’ Just kind of odd. What was all that about? People that knew how to control a crowd.”
@SenRonJohnson FBI hinders J6 probe by making people fearful of coming forward, @SenRonJohnson says. Media attacks on people with evidence that diverges from the 'insurrectionist' line silences witnesses who fear 'conspiracy theorist' accusations. @cspanc-span.org/video/?c498801…
@SenRonJohnson@cspan Johnson to JMW in above video: "It’s been so difficult to put the truth together. Because first of how your eyewitness account was treated, really, termed a conspiracy theory. But also the way that the FBI has doggedly pursued anybody that was basically in Washington DC...."
@SenRonJohnson@cspan "... Early morning raids and SWAT teams and that type of thing. So people are not willing to come forward with their videos.... as much as I’m trying to solicit that, people – they were here in the Capitol. They just kind of want that forgotten....So it is going to be difficult."
"It’s interesting to see some of the plea agreements downgraded from a felony to a petty misdemeanor of – what, unlawful parading? – I think that was one of them."
@SenRonJohnson@cspan .@SenRonJohnson: "I’m not defending people that entered the Capitol. As a matter of fact I was on a radio show that date [January 6], in the midst of the breach, and one of the radio talk show hosts from Wisconsin...by the way who’s Capitol was breached and occupied for days..."
@SenRonJohnson@cspan "...That was OK, they were the right kind of protesters. They were from the left. And that was OK. They can vandalize the Capitol and that’s OK," @SenRonJohnson said of leftists who took Wisconsin's Capitol. J6 "just happened to be the wrong people occupying the people’s house."
@SenRonJohnson@cspan "This radio talk show host, because of what happened in Madison, said [on J6], ‘Well, I hope they get in there, I hope they do a sit-in, that’s the people’s house.’ And I said, ‘No, that’s where I depart company with you. People should not be entering the Capitol." @SenRonJohnson
"So I was on record but I don’t get credit for the actual things I say. People just conjure up, and put the worst possible spin. They’ll take things out of context. That’s kind of where we’re at in the media today."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If Senate Republicans don't confirm Matt Gaetz as attorney general & Kash Patel as FBI director, President Trump should sign an executive order to dissolve the FBI by rescinding the July 26, 1908 order that the FBI calls its founding document.
The FBI cannot be reformed. We need better, more effective federal law enforcement and counterintelligence than the FBI provides - and one free of the taint of decades of abuses. Only Gaetz & Patel can do that. Here's how the process might look.
Grok, Perplexity, and ChatGPT can't find a law that established the FBI. When you ask ChatGPT for the law, it gives the 1908 attorney general memorandum, saying "the FBI was formed through an executive order rather than a specific law."
🧵 Destruction of federal records outside the confines of the Federal Records Act (FRA) is a crime.
That destruction is going on right now.
To report report unauthorized disposition, email UnauthorizedDisposition@nara.gov.
The FRA has not been enforced anywhere in the federal government over the last 16+ years. archives.gov/news/topics/fe…
2) Any federal employee altering or destroying a federal record, prior to meeting its appropriate National Archives & Records Administratin (NARA)-approved retention period, after November 5th should be caught and prosecuted for violating the Federal Records Act.
Each agency's Senior Agency Official for Records Management and Agency Records Officers must also be held legally responsible.
Trump47 should remove & replace failed NARA leadership and comprehensively reform the government's records management system.
4 years ago today: @Politico breaks false story of the 51 intelligence and national security former officials saying Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation. politico.com/news/2020/10/1…
NY Post contacted many of the Spies Who Lied to get a response. Here's the list, directly quoted from @nypost:
Mike Hayden, former CIA director, now analyst for CNN: Didn’t respond.
Jim Clapper, former director of national intelligence, now CNN pundit: “Yes, I stand by the statement made AT THE TIME, and would call attention to its 5th paragraph. I think sounding such a cautionary note AT THE TIME was appropriate.”
Leon Panetta, former CIA director and defense secretary, now runs a public policy institute at California State University: Declined comment.
John Brennan, former CIA director, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC: Didn’t respond.
Thomas Fingar, former National Intelligence Council chair, now teaches at Stanford University: Didn’t respond.
Rick Ledgett, former National Security Agency deputy director, now a director at M&T Bank: Didn’t respond.
John McLaughlin, former CIA acting director, now teaches at Johns Hopkins University: Didn’t respond.
Michael Morell, former CIA acting director, now at George Mason University: Didn’t respond.
Mike Vickers, former defense undersecretary for intelligence, now on board of BAE Systems: Didn’t respond.
Doug Wise, former Defense Intelligence Agency deputy director, teaches at University of New Mexico: Didn’t respond.
Nick Rasmussen, former National Counterterrorism Center director, now executive director, Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism: Didn’t respond.
Russ Travers, former National Counterterrorism Center acting director: “The letter explicitly stated that we didn’t know if the emails were genuine, but that we were concerned about Russian disinformation efforts. I spent 25 years as a Soviet/Russian analyst. Given the context of what the Russians were doing at the time (and continue to do — Ukraine being just the latest example), I considered the cautionary warning to be prudent.”
Andy Liepman, former National Counterterrorism Center deputy director: “As far as I know I do [stand by the statement] but I’m kind of busy right now.”
John Moseman, former CIA chief of staff: Didn’t respond.
Larry Pfeiffer, former CIA chief of staff, now senior advisor to The Chertoff Group: Didn’t respond.
Jeremy Bash, former CIA chief of staff, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC: Didn’t respond.
Rodney Snyder, former CIA chief of staff: Didn’t respond.
Glenn Gerstell, former National Security Agency general counsel: Didn’t respond.
David Priess, former CIA analyst and manager: “Thank you for reaching out. I have no further comment at this time.”
Pam Purcilly, former CIA deputy director of analysis: Didn’t respond.
Marc Polymeropoulos, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
Chris Savos, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
John Tullius, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
David A. Vanell, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
Kristin Wood, former CIA senior intelligence officer, now non-resident fellow, Harvard: Didn’t respond.
David Buckley, former CIA inspector general: Didn’t respond.
Nada Bakos, former CIA analyst and targeting officer, now senior fellow, Foreign Policy Research Institute: Didn’t respond.
Patty Brandmaier, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
James B. Bruce, former CIA senior intelligence office: Didn’t respond.
David Cariens, former CIA intelligence analyst: Didn’t respond.
Janice Cariens, former CIA operational support officer: Didn’t respond.
Paul Kolbe, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
Peter Corsell, former CIA analyst: Didn’t respond.
Brett Davis, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
Roger Zane George, former national intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
Steven L. Hall, former CIA senior intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
Kent Harrington, former national intelligence officer: Didn’t respond.
Don Hepburn, former national security executive, now president of Boanerges Solutions LLC: “My position has not changed any. I believe the Russians made a huge effort to alter the course of the election . . . The Russians are masters of blending truth and fiction and making something feel incredibly real when it’s not. Nothing I have seen really changes my opinion. I can’t tell you what part is real and what part is fake, but the thesis still stands for me, that it was a media influence hit job.”
Timothy D. Kilbourn, former dean of CIA’s Kent School of Intelligence Analysis: Didn’t respond.
Ron Marks, former CIA officer: Didn’t respond.
Jonna Hiestand Mendez, former CIA technical operations officer, now on board of the International Spy Museum: “I don’t have any comment. I would need a little more information.”
Emile Nakhleh, former director of CIA’s Political Islam Strategic Analysis Program, now at University of New Mexico: “I have not seen any information since then that would alter the decision behind signing the letter. That’s all I can go into. The whole issue was highly politicized and I don’t want to deal with that. I still stand by that letter.”
Gerald A. O’Shea, former CIA senior operations officer: Didn’t respond.
Nick Shapiro, former CIA deputy chief of staff and senior adviser to the director: Didn’t respond.
John Sipher, former CIA senior operations officer [and former advisory board member of @ProjectLincoln, which was co-founded by a registered agent of Russia]: Declined to comment.
Stephen Slick, former National Security Council senior director for intelligence programs:
Didn’t respond.
Cynthia Strand, former CIA deputy assistant director for global issues: Didn’t respond.
Greg Tarbell, former CIA deputy executive director: Didn’t respond.
David Terry, former National Intelligence Collection Board chairman: Couldn’t be reached.
Greg Treverton, former National Intelligence Council chair, now senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies: “I’ll pass. I haven’t followed the case recently.”
Winston Wiley, former CIA director of analysis: Couldn’t be reached.
After Wray does not answer, @RepClayHiggins said, “It should be a ‘no.’ Can you not tell the American people, ‘No, we did not have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters positioned inside the Capitol on January 6?’”
One year has past since Higgins last put the simple “yes” or “no” question to FBI Director Wray.
“Still don’t have a definitive answer from you,” Higgins says. “We can’t get a straight answer.”
Wray then re-worded Rep. Higgins’ question to say something Higgins never said, and covered himself by denying his own invented question.
Wray: “If you are asking whether the violence at the Capitol on January 6 was part of domestic violence operation orchestrated by FBI sources and/or agents, the answer is emphatically not. No. Not violence orchestrated by FBI sources or agents.”
Of course, that was not Higgins’ question. Higgins didn’t ask about violence. Wray made up his own straw-man question so he could knock it down.
🧵In 2005, the bipartisan Commission on Election Reform, co-chaired by Jimmy Carter and James A. Baker III, expressed concerns about electronic voting systems.
2) Carter-Baker report, pp. 25-27: Voting machines lack transparency.
“Voting machines must … be transparent. They must allow for recounts and for audits, and thereby giver voters confidence in the accuracy of the vote tallies.”
“The accessibility and accuracy of DREs [direct recording electronic machines], however, are offset by a lack of transparency, which has raised concerns about security and verifiability. In most of the DREs used in 2004, voters could not check that their ballot was recorded correctly. Some DREs had no capacity for an independent recount.”
3) Carter-Baker report, p. 27 says there are no standards of transparency for voting machines (and, by implication, software):
"The standards for voting systems ... should assure ... transparency in all voting machines. Because these standards usually guide the decisions of voting machine manufacturers, the manufacturers should be encouraged to build machines in the future that are both accessible and transparent ….”
In a 62-page ruling, a federal magistrate judge agrees with @dominionvoting and sacks attorney Stefanie Lambert from defending @PatrickByrne from Dominion.
Case 1:21-cv-02131-CJN-MAU.
The judge is with the squeaky-clean US District Court for the District of Columbia.
What is in the emails being produced in discovery that Dominion wants to keep secret?
@dominionvoting @PatrickByrne Download the 62-page PDF of the court decision siding with Dominion to sack Patrick Byrne's attorney, Stefanie Lambert.
I have posted this on my Academia account in the public interest so that people may download it for free. I am not party to this case. academia.edu/122888005/DOMI…
What is in those Dominion emails that is so damning that the company is pulling out all the stops to prevent their disclosure?
Could it have to do with @Smartmatic? Could it be related to election fraud? Did someone at Dominion commit a crime? What do you have to say, @dominionvoting?