There is a point beyond which our grief about the gathering collapse of Earth systems can no longer be suppressed. I now realise that I've protected myself all these years by intellectualising the problem. But as governments keep failing, I can’t keep stifling the sense of loss.
I'm being told on Twitter to "toughen up". But it isn't tough to pretend that all is well when it so obviously isn't. It's tougher to face it.
In my mind, there is no contradiction between accepting the grief and a determination to fight the forces of destruction. On the contrary, it drives me on.
In our somewhat self-flaggelating style, we on the left have been obsessed with GB News, while often overlooking the astonishing (much greater) success of new channels that challenge power, such as @DoubleDownNews and @BylineTV. We should do more to celebrate this blossoming.
I'm very interested in new outlets challenging an established broadcast media that has let us down very badly, esp on environmental issues. Over the past year I've been involved in two new ventures that've worked well: @rivercide_live and @COP26_tv. There's lots more to be done.
I think the promise of new media - that we could use them to mount a serious challenge to business as usual - is beginning to materialise. I'm surprised it took so long, but we now seem to be in the take-off phase. Let's celebrate our successes so far, and keep innovating.
Some prominent people are now arguing that, for climate movements to succeed, they have to reach across the political spectrum, appealing to conservative as much as radical and liberal values. I believe this reflects a mistaken theory of change. This thread seeks to explain why.
The big shift in the past year is the emergence of a truly global climate movement, and the sense that its leadership is now coming from the Global South. This is as it should be: poor nations are hit hardest by climate breakdown and their voices have for too long been unheard.
This is where hope lies. A global crisis demands a genuinely global response, led by those on the front lines of the disaster, and this is what is happening, at great speed. It’s hard to see the necessary shift happening any other way.
There's a major reckoning required here. It was in our private schools that children were immersed in the ideology of empire, while subjected to extreme discipline, the complete loss of autonomy and the purging of dissident views and behaviour.
Thread/ theguardian.com/world/2021/nov…
WH Auden remarked that life at these schools “was based on fear …. not to mention the temptation it offered to the natural informer …. It makes one dishonest and unadventurous. The best reason I have for opposing fascism is that at school I lived in a fascist state."
But many boys did not draw the same conclusion. The ideology in which they were immersed became the justifying framework of their lives. And they imposed it on other people both at home and abroad.
I'm on my way home from #COP26, full of frustration and fury after reading the draft declaration. The world's powerful governments propose to do more to defend the fossil fuel industry than to defend life on Earth.
If they were serious about preventing more than 1.5C of heating and, potentially, systemic environmental collapse, they would decide to burn no more fossil fuels after 2030, and to launch today an emergency programme of fullscale economic transition.
But they are not serious.
Some delegations will be glowing with satisfaction about defending their fossil fuel industries from anything more challenging than the "perhaps ... one day ... but only if you feel ready" draft text.
But there are no winners here. We are all losers.
The general lack of knowledge about the prospect of systemic environmental collapse reflects the greatest failure of public information in history.
Hand on heart, without searching, how many of the following 3 very basic questions about our predicament can you answer?
Thread/
1. Name more than one greenhouse gas. 2. Within a few parts per million, what is the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere? 3. What is the global average temperature rise since 1880?
I suspect that far more people could list all the teams that played in the quarter finals of the Euros than could correctly answer these three questions. We have been kept in a state of ignorance about the greatest challenge humans have ever faced. How can we act unless we know?
When ministers slap down effective environmental laws, when they cross their fingers instead of taking the action needed to stop Covid from spreading, it’s because they believe in fairytales: the “invisible hand of the market” will somehow sort it all out.
Thread/
Why do they believe in magic? Because throughout their lives they’ve been surrounded by it. Food magically appears in front of them. When they throw their clothes on the floor, they reappear in the wardrobe, washed and ironed. Houses clean themselves. They live in a fairytale.
They are surrounded by invisible hands, the unseen, unappreciated work of mothers, nannies, wives, servants and underlings, making things happen, while they strut and posture and build their castles in the air.