9 days from now, I have my first experience of Uruguayan democracy. Sounds exciting, huh?
Well, not really. Because however much I'm full of praise for most aspects of democracy here, the one on Sunday week is BIZARRE. And most Uruguayans unquestionably think likewise on that.
Voting is compulsory here. People are fined if they don't. The consequence at general and local elections is that parties cannot afford to ignore any group.
In the UK, the old vote much more than the young, so they are prioritised. The system here ensures everyone has a stake.
That's all fine. Uruguayans are proud of their democracy - ranked as among the top six in the world - and Freedom House rank this country as the joint sixth most free on the planet.
But there's a catch. Because not all elections here are general or local elections.
A few weeks ago, there were university elections - in which every single student or graduate of the public university (which most students go to) had to vote. On a Wednesday. With polling stations closing quite early in the evening.
Not voting meant a fine and for students, the suspension of their course!
In some university departments, there was only one option to vote for.
In some polling stations, there were 2-hour long queues on a working day, for an election 99% of voters knew nothing about.
By which I mean: nobody knew anything about the candidates/lists, but were required to vote regardless.
On Sunday week, it's the BPS elections. The Banco Prevision Social are responsible for social security here: all workers pay in every month.
Yet it's not independent of government. If the government passes tax, social security or pension changes through Parliament, the BPS must act accordingly.
So quite *why* we all have to vote for the directors of the BPS is beyond me. And pretty much everyone else.
I have never come across an election in my life - least of all, an obligatory one under pain of financial penalty - where LITERALLY NOBODY KNOWS ANYTHING ABOUT THE CANDIDATES.
But that's the case here. There's no information, no publicity, no campaigning, and no public knowledge
As far as I can see, the only reason this and the university elections are compulsory is because the organisations in question know that if they weren't, nobody would vote except candiates' families and friends.
That's not an exaggeration. It's perverse.
Just as perverse is Parliament's continued failure to stop these elections being compulsory. Perhaps that'll happen over the next few years; perhaps it won't.
I'll do my best to inform myself on who I'll be voting for. But good lord, it's nuts.
In some cases, business owners even have to vote in MORE THAN ONE polling station! I couldn't think of a more fun way for them to spend their Sunday.
I love this country. But certain aspects of it are like the creation of someone's sick sense of humour.
UruWHY? ¯_(ツ)_/¯.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One of my running themes on here is how profoundly contradictory Uruguay truly is. Here's another example. Oscar Tabarez is the biggest single reason I live here. Yes, really!
Yet I've also been desperate for him to go for 9 years now.
The reason I live in Uruguay is because I fell in love with their national team at Wembley in May 1990.
A game I went to anticipating 1986-style thuggery; yet watched utterly enthralled by the sheer gentleness of Uruguay's play. It was like football from another age.
I wasn't even 12 yet, but was already obsessed with football and unusually observant and analytical. I felt like I was watching a team from the 1950s; it was unique, different. Special.
And the reason for their play was, 100%, Tabarez. Back then, an aesthete. An idealist.
3. England: a semi-final then a final means... The rest of the world will be talking about us and have us down as a major contender. A young side and squad with so much emerging talent. And the tournament's being played mid-season - England won't be tired. That could be decisive.
4. Brazil: solid, reliable... but they have no X-factor, nothing to make the difference in tight knockout games. And a stat: Brazil have not beaten a single European side in a World Cup knockout match since 2002.
Seeded in play-offs: Portugal, Scotland, Italy, Russia, Sweden, Wales.
Unseeded in play-offs: Turkey, Poland, North Macedonia, Ukraine, Austria, Czechia.
Despite them having won away to Germany in these qualifiers (!), everyone's gonna want North Macedonia out of those.
But they're all much of a muchness. Turkey away would've been tough - but Turkey at home really isn't. What the Czechs do at the Euros, they never do at the WC.
Austria looked great v Italy at the Euros but haven't really since. Poland are very decent but invariably flatter to deceive. And Ukraine are crap.
None of those opponents should hold any real fears for Scotland or Wales - except maybe the Czechs.
They've gone through the 'hard to beat' phase and developed such a superb sense of teamship. Now they're moving on to something more: as befits Clarke's approach to the game. He's a genuinely enlightened coach.
3. That win last night was huge. They'd've had very little chance of qualifying as an unseeded team. They have every chance now - but obviously, need to avoid the Italy or Portugal sections.
But they've improved so much that even against them, they wouldn't have no chance.