"My concern is what we are doing imposing a public interest on the individual. I think it's for the individual and the parties and third parties to decide."
@ArpitaDutt1 on if third parties should monitor NDAs.
@ArpitaDutt1 "The story I hear is that the individual just wants the matter to go away, they're not even sure they want to complain. What they're really worried about & that reason can often be a trigger to an internal complaint is they don't want this to happen to anybody else." @ArpitaDutt1
"If you look at this on a really basic level there is just nothing appropriate about using a contract to hide something harmful." @ZeldaZeldaluna@cbmsilence
"I've yet to see an account where an employee felt empowered or protected by a claim."
"When people push back they find they can walk away without an NDA because it's a bluff. Because what theses folks don't want in the first place is publicity." @ProfJulieMac@cbmsilence
"I totally acknowledge that NDAs are potentially damaging, or feel potentially damaging for employees." @Bethmcp
"But I think in some circumstances it provides comfort to the individual, that something which is very personal to them, very very traumatic, isn't going to get out in the public domain." @Bethmcp
"I do think it's important to note, the people that @ZeldaZeldaluna and I talk to are looking back at this months later, and every single one of them regrets." @ProfJulieMac@cbmsilence
"I don't think victims really ever want to go public. It's not about going public, it's about stopping the behavior." @ZeldaZeldaluna@cbmsilence
👏👏👏Massive thanks to all of our amazing panelists for sharing their thought provoking perspectives #metooconference
➡️bit.ly/3DEjthm Sign up to our newsletter to be the first to know about our future events and panels!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨 Our sexual harassment at work conference is starting now🚨
🗣️Be part of the conversation by using the hashtag #metooconference and tagging us.
💜We’ll be posting throughout the day and would love to hear from you!
📢"As women we are brought up to accept through our whole lives that we are not safe from sexual violence anywhere."
Powerful words from our first speaker @_HelenMott_ on the importance of being alive to the psychology of bias in sexual harassment cases. #metooconference
.@_HelenMott_ on 🚩himpathy🚩: the inappropriate & disproportionate sympathy for perpetrators, including a reluctance to believe women who report and reluctance to punish perpetrators of sexual harassment.
🛑This creates barriers to women's access to justice. #metooconference
The amendments we're supporting will allow a better, safer balance between protecting CHIS agents' cover AND protecting all of us from potentially grave crimes and abuses of power. #nostatesanctionedVAWG
BREAKING📢Baroness Chakrabarti says: "This Bill unamended is one of the most dangerous I have ever seen presented to Your Lordships' house." #nostatesanctionedVAWG
Government released a report on the second private beta testing phase of the EU Settlement Scheme today. Rights of Women was one of the 7 community organisations that supported vulnerable applicants during this phase. THREAD
One of our concerns about the settlement scheme is that applicants may not receive the status they are eligible for i.e. those entitled to ‘settled status’ (indefinite leave to remain) may instead receive ‘pre-settled status’ (5 years limited leave to remain).
In the first private beta testing phase in 2018, government reported that everyone got the status that they expected. In the report published today, there is no reference to this measure. We don’t know how many applicants during PB2 didn’t get the status they applied for.