Unsolicited Review: Castle Grade N98 respirator. This gets a recommendation from me. TGA approved making it suitable for HCWs. It is comfortable and reusable. Ideal for Australian HCWs who suffer PPE burns from N95 masks, while upgrading aerosol protection castlegrade.com.au
Initial concerns included that I am not fit-tested by work, but as soon as you put it on you can tell there is reduced air leakage around the mask edges vs. a fit-tested N95. That means ZERO fogging of glasses. The tight seal pushes the air through the front of the respiratory
The acid test is whether I'd wear it working on COVID duties despite not being fit-tested. The answer is YES. There is obvious reduction in air leakage around the mask edges. It would be difficult for work to object to me wearing a TGA approved N98 respiratory instead of an N95
Reusability means environmental friendliness. It is also fairly economical to run as the filter lasts for 32 hours of direct use ie about every three days. A pack of 25 filters costs $60 (free shipping >$99). Replacing it is easy and takes seconds to do. castlegrade.com.au/products/filte…
You can see from my photo that it is small and discrete. It lacks the frightful "gas mask" appearance of many elastomeric respirators! Even non-HCWs could wear it without it turning heads, and in the long run, may be more economical to run than buying throwaway masks
The one drawback is that it muffles the speaking voice. This makes it necessary to speak more slowly and deliberately while clearly articulating words. However, the effect is modest and was not a dealbreaker for me. Models designed to retain vocal clarity do exist overseas
I did consider the transparent Canopy elastomeric N98 respirator as it doesn't muffle the voice (helpful for the hearing impaired), but it's neither NIOSH (approval pending) nor TGA approved for work use. It's expensive and international shipping is a pain onecanopy.com/products/canop…
I'm also keeping my KF94s for cycling. No peri-mask air-leaks means all the air goes through a small filter. You get a soft hissing (think Darth Vader) sound as you expire. It's not designed to move enough air for high-intensity exercise
Just an addit. This is a Melbourne based Australian firm. The product is approved by the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). No approvals for other jurisdictions are claimed eg Canada, US, Europe, UK etc if you are using this in a HCW setting
Finally, keep in mind this piece of feedback from @kate_cole_ that TGA approval on its own is not sufficient to make this suitable for the workplace. Thank you very much for your feedback, Kate. All readers of this thread please take due note
This doesn't solve my issues. On non-COVID areas of the hospital we're not given fit-tested P2 masks and the ones that are can only be found in the COVID ward. A Sunstrom SR100 or SR200 is hardly practical for F2F clinical use. A Halo costs a grand
A physician simply cannot do non-COVID ward rounds in this. Between a P2 which has failed fit-testing and surgical mask, I am still going to take my chances with a Castle Grade as it gives a better seal than my fit-tested P2 and doesn't fog my glasses
ADDIT: please keep in mind that this respirator does not conform to the AS/NZS 1716: 2012 standard for a P2/N95 respiratory. It is thus best reserved for non-COVID duties where a high-grade respirator is not mandated by your workplace
@kate_cole_ The more I think about this, the less I think this is a failure on behalf of clinicians sourcing their own PPE to avoid pain, ulcers, fogging glasses, impaired vocal clarity. It's a failure of #occupationalhygienists to come up with solutions to these problems
Note: Castle Grade make no claims to conforming to "N98" regulatory standards. The information they do provide is as follows. They also make no claims to "self-conforming" to the P2 AS/NZS 1716: 2012 standard. My fit-tested Trident work mask does though and it leaks like a sieve!
How do I know my work test-fitted P2/N95 leaks more than the Castle Grade? My glasses fog when worn, lenses fog when held up against sides or bottom. Doesn't happen on the CG, no matter where you hold your lenses eg bottom, sides, in front of filter ie the aerosol is filtered out

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr Satoshi Akima

Dr Satoshi Akima Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ToshiAkima

20 Nov
Another cycling day today. 50km done wearing a KF94 mask all throughout the ride (only removed to drink water). The trick to avoiding having it fog up your glasses is to push it as high on the bridge of your nose as possible.
During my work N95 fit testing, I was instructed to push the N95 mask as high up as possible. A KF94 is smaller so it causes it to sit above your chin, but this encourages exhaled air to be expelled from the bottom—not the top, fogging up the glasses
I was also instructed to carefully mould the nose bridge wire so that it fits the contour of your face. It's best to do this in front of a mirror. This further improves the fit, reducing leaks of air upwards, fogging up your glasses.
Read 6 tweets
19 Nov
The answer is that it doesn't matter. Masks, social distancing and lockdowns are NPIs not drugs. It's enough signal that everyone gets masked and the burden of proof is on those who want to demask to provide level 1 evidence it won't cause excess mortality/morbidity.
The burden of proof to come up with evidence to substantiate their position falls on those who propose the potentially unsafe course of action. With novel drugs, that falls on the prescriber/manufacturer of the drug. With NPIs it is the de-prescriber of precautionary measures
There is no level 1a+++ evidence for the efficacy of lockdowns, handwashing, or social distancing for COVID. That is not grounds for de-prescription of these precautionary NPIs. The burden of proof falls on those who wish to de-prescribe them to prove it won't increase mortality
Read 6 tweets
19 Nov
If Australians wish to avoid further disruptive lockdowns, we must find alternative NPIs to take their place. The evidence is clear: universal mask mandates are the best solution. They probably work even better than lockdowns or social distancing while keeping the economy running
The only reason to reject masks is that we love lockdowns. That's what's going to happen if we don't find a better alternative. Now we know #COVIDisAirborne we can use this insight to find more mode-of-transmission specific NPIs other than crude lockdowns
Anyone who rejects masks is an agent of chaos who secretly wishes more lockdowns upon us for the purpose of stirring social unrest, then harnessing it for their crazed populist cause. Gallows and all Image
Read 6 tweets
18 Nov
Masks are 2x more effective than social distancing according to a new BMJ systematic review. This isn't the first systematic review to come to such conclusions. That it is mechanistically plausible based on COVID's airborne mode of spread makes it highly credible #COVIDisAirborne
From a Cochrane review dated 6th Jul 2011: "Surgical masks or N95 respirators were the most consistent and comprehensive supportive measures. There was limited evidence that social distancing was effective" cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.10…
The information found in that 2011 Cochrane review formed a springboard for the South Koreans to develop aerosol-mitigation based systematic biosecurity defence protocols that are the envy of the world
Read 5 tweets
17 Nov
COVID mRNA vaccines aren't dose-equivalent: "A homologous booster with 30μg [Pfizer] increased neutralizing antibody titers to more than 5 times as high as after dose 2. 50µg of [Moderna] increased neutralizing antibody titers 3.8-fold and 2.1-fold" medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Here's another source saying that 30µg of Pfizer boosts Ab levels more than 50µg of Moderna. Yet we know that 2 x 100µg Moderna is more effective than 2 x 50µg Pfizer ImageImage
The 50µg Moderna 3rd shot appears less effective than a 30µg Pfizer. But that's because they aren't equipotent µg to µg. It's likely the Moderna 3rd shot would have been as effective if you had kept it at 100µg. In Australia, the 3rd Moderna dose will be 100µg, in the US, 50µg
Read 5 tweets
24 Oct
People get curiously upset about the idea that viral infections might drive neurodegenerative disease. But this is an old concept that has been well explored in the literature. For example the link between Herpes simplex and Alzheimer's nature.com/articles/s4146…
There are people who get upset over the fact that I am tweeting on an area I'm not published in. It doesn't change the fact that there are peer-reviewed publications on the subject statnews.com/2020/05/06/res…
I believe in anthropogenic climate change, yet I am not a climatologist. Likewise, it is reasonable for me to post material viruses causing neurodegenerative disease where I am able to support my statements with quality citations pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34205498/
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(