Bottom line: Peter Thiel and Elon Musk have allied with Putin and oil/gas interests to try to undermine the dollar as the world’s reserve currency, in a fascist bid to destroy the US and EU administrative states.
Pick a side.
This intel assessment was developed early this year. Sharing now publicly because it’s becoming a more acute situation.
The corollary to this is that oil/gas interests see undermining states as their surest path towards avoiding both regulation and competition from renewables.
It is common for participants at the lower tiers of a cultish network not to understand the full aims and purpose of the project.
Cultish social groups have long been used as part of intelligence operations; see Moonies, etc. So this is nothing new.
I am accustomed to 1) saying things before people are ready to hear them, 2) being right, ultimately, 3) dealing with the cultish groups that try to protect their project. Pushback is expected.
About a year ago I said that a network of military and intelligence professionals was trying to stage a coup, and using Parler to do it. That turned out to be accurate and we are dealing with the aftermath of no one listening then.
This monetary attack is the second phase of that same attack, conducted by the same network for the same fundamental reasons. Eventually that will be figured out, and in history books. Until then, we wait.
From official China state media yesterday. The debt limit increase is now the critical moment. McConnell needs maximum sunlight on him and his Russia connections. He has said he won’t raise the debt limit. We need to make it impossible for him not to. Default is not an option.
Serious people with additional information on this situation, and/or media, may contact me via DM and or my same username at gmail. This is a serious situation and needs coordinated effort to counter.
Here is an early overview of the Thiel/Bannon alliance, and Thiel’s oft-repeated observation that “freedom and democracy are not compatible.” He meant it, and he and Bannon have done all they have said they would do.
Right before Bannon’s recent arrest, he was shilling a crypto coin meant to challenge the Chinese yuan. He and Guo Wengui have an ongoing project to overthrow the Chinese Communist Party, also.
The so-called “New Federal State of China” is led by Bannon and funded by Guo. It is aligned with Taiwan and the historic Kuomintang anti-communist network.
It is difficult to know what to make of the increased recent cooperation of China CCP with Russia re: the dollar, but it would seem Bannon has his bases covered either way. Both Chinese factions seem intent on clobbering the dollar.
This just in from Mike Flynn, accusing the left of doing exactly what I said this crew is doing, in a feeble attempt to get ahead of my viral thread. They accused the left of plotting a coup prior to the 2020 election, and then did it themselves. Mike Flynn is a traitor.
1/Russia and Thiel are done with Trump: Khanna, Massie, Greene, Boebert, Mace, Sherman, McGovern sign discharge petition to force release of Epstein files; will create significant public pressure for dirt on Trump, which will likely be difficult to fulfill.
2/Meanwhile Johnson, who is backed by authors of Project Russia, is running his own parallel game w/House Oversight, promising to release even more. But neither camp is talking about Sen. Wyden’s investigation into Epstein’s $1bn+ money flows that would reveal the full scope…
3/of his activities, which include infiltrating scientific research institutions in the same manner pursued by Robert Maxwell. Outside the prurient and illegal sexual activity, this is where the biggest story lies, and you can expect that Russia, Thiel and their allies…
1/Increasingly bothered by the argument that the path to “intelligence” requires the theft of all known intellectual property. That’s not anything but theft, and if you were actually building “intelligence” it theoretically requires near zero training data.
2/If, as proponents argue, we are simulating human intelligence “in silico” then we should be able to build what amounts to a 12 year old’s mind. A 12 year old can be extremely “intelligent” (genius level in fact) but has necessarily trained on very little data.
3/Few are talking about solving that problem, because we really haven’t figured out the neuro-symbolic architecture to do it. Instead, we are vacuuming up copyrighted works (stored intellectual work of others) and billing that as “PhD level intelligence.” What utter bullshit.
The funniest part about Zuck throwing billions into AI is his naming of the effort as “superintelligence,” as if that alone will manifest the gods. The second funniest part is he desperately tried to manifest the metaverse just 3 years ago — and failed at that, too.
What this tells us is that the core FB properties are aging cash cows and Zuck is desperate to invest billions in anything that will ensure his personal relevance as a tech titan 10-20 years from now. Good luck, but throwing money at things is no guarantee of success.
As @GaryMarcus and I have been saying the last few years, AI is up against some very challenging limits, and despite the massive investments in the space, progress has plateaued. Plenty to be done with what’s been built, but unclear the investments will be recouped anytime soon.
1/Yesterday, OpenAI demonstrated that even after spending untold billions on scaling AI models, LLM’s alone aren’t the ticket to achieving superintelligence. This is linear growth, not an exponential leap, and that has several implications…
2/First, it vindicates people like @GaryMarcus who have correctly argued that language-only architectures lack capacity for reason and actual world modeling, and that neuro-symbolic architectures are needed. I agree, and while we can say “I told you so,” that’s not important…
3/relative to other implications. Much bigger is the coming reckoning in the marketplace. Models are commodities. Application developers have opportunities to make money, but there is likely to be a big contraction in the AI sector generally. That’s fine and a natural…
As the Epstein blackmail/espionage story continues to fall apart, bookmark this for future reference. At some point people will figure this out. gameb.wiki/index.php?titl…
This aligns with the data-driven analysis we performed. What Acosta may have been indicating is that Epstein was involved as a confidential informant on a case; but there is little else to indicate ongoing large-scale involvement or a sprawling blackmail ring.
That doesn’t mean there isn’t stuff we don’t know and that some of it is material. But it may mean that the government doesn’t have details on it, and that it’s incumbent on journalists to find out more. Our analysis here. america2.news/we-mapped-jeff…
That said, journalists have doggedly picked over reams of data and leads on Epstein for decades. The idea we can find more when incentives were already so high seems improbable. But let the govt show what they have and let journalists do their work; we’ll see where that leads.