Forty-seven trans people have been violently killed so far in 2021. While this number represents an increasing trend, let's talk about what that number doesn't tell us.
* These are violent crimes, meaning someone else took their lives. This number does not reflect those that took their own lives as a result of unmanageable pressures of discrimination, abandonment, homelessness, forced conversion therapy, etc.
2/
* This number only includes those situations where Law Enforcement documents the victim as transgender. It does not include those killed where police and families hid the gender identity of the victim. This is a common occurrence and skews the numbers heavily.
3/
* This number does not tell you how many perpetrators get away with murdering transgender people because the police aren't motivated to investigate or the perpetrator is allowed to use the "trans/gay panic" defense to escape justice.
4/
* This number doesn't tell you how disproportionately this violence impacts transgender people of color. A majority of these deaths and other violent crimes are committed against trans women of color in particular. This only furthers our society's apathy toward this violence.
5/
* This number doesn't even touch on non-fatal violent crimes, sexual assaults, etc. that trans people face every day, let alone the ones that don't even get reported because trans people can't trust law enforcement to protect them.
6/
* This number doesn't tell the story of evictions, refusals from homeless shelters, firings from jobs, and other discrimination that occurs every day because of a lack of protection for transgender people in our laws.
7/
* This number doesn't tell you about the many medically necessary (as deemed by doctors world-wide) procedures that trans people are forced to find a way to pay for out of pocket because insurance companies refuse to pay.
8/
* This number doesn't say anything about the difficulty in funding research to understand and better treat gender dysphoria because the extremist right has blocked so many of the pathways for such research.
9/
So as we come to a close on Transgender Day of Remembrance 2021, please take a few moments to find some compassion and empathy. While you can't understand what it is like to be transgender, I'm sure you can at least imagine what it would be like to go through life facing
10/
all of these challenges and more. Before you dismiss it, deem it not your issue, or think there's nothing you can do to help, remember how many people every year who could be contributing so much to our world, are instead forced to live hidden in plain sight.
11/
I beg of you, please be an ally. Please seek to share understanding, support, and love with all your siblings in this world. You never know who you might just be a beacon of hope for at the very moment they needed it most.
/FIN
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One of the worst habits we have in security is speaking in absolutes. Saying things like "Unhackable", "Breachproof", "Fully Secure", "No Risk". They're simply untrue.
But this also includes when we talk about skillsets. There are no absolutes.
1/
So when someone says, "You must know x, y, z" or "You have to do a, b, c" to get a certain job (or any job) in security, you can simply toss out those absolutes in with all the other fallacious absolutisms that security people throw around. Simply ignore them.
2/
The reality is we need people of all different skillsets, all different backgrounds, and with all different perspectives in order to be successful. Security is about problem solving and problem solving is strongest when different viewpoints collaborate.
3/
As more job descriptions are including pay range, you as a job seeker need to understand how those ranges actually work.
You might look at a range of $110K-155K and say, well I'll take $155K thanks! However, that might not always be the right approach.
1/
Unfortunately, most orgs only train managers (and sometimes not even them) on how these ranges work. Typically, there is a high, low, and midpoint.
The high-level goal is to bring people who are below the mid-point for a role, up to that mid-point.
2/
This happens through good performance appraisals that drive good raises and up they float. For those who've now moved beyond the mid-point, that's a sign to their leader that they should be about ready for next level up (i.e. a promotion), so those conversations start.
3/
The technical interview is one of the most contentious aspects of the recruiting process IMHO. Hiring managers and orgs don't always handle it well and candidates get beat up with anxiety from the process. So how do we make it better?
1/
When I interviewed for my role at @Snyksec, I thought I bombed my tech interview. Benji asked me a couple questions about concepts I had never heard of before.
I admitted I didn't know the answer, but then shared a bit of logical deduction based on the terms as to what
2/
I thought they may mean. I was sure I had really messed up. However, I got an offer and shortly after I started I found out he thought I did very well and actually had recommended hiring me based off the interview. He told me he liked how I thought about things and that I was
3/
So I really want @ECCouncil to understand the damage they've done (a thread):
1. People who proudly achieved certifications are now disavowing and not renewing those certifications because of the shady practices of the org that provided those certs. All that hard work, lost.
2. People who won awards from your org are now renouncing those awards because they don't want to be associated with the practices of a company like @ECCouncil. These were accomplishments they should be able to be proud of that you've ruined.
3. Organizations and universities who've built educational programs and partnerships are being forced to review and potentially change their entire approach because they can't count on the integrity of @ECCouncil's materials.
So I want to make clear just how trivial it was to find repeated cases of plagiarism in the EC-Council blogs. All it took was going to recent blogs, finding a few key terms in the content and then Googling for those terms. Literally that's it. #ECCPlagiarism
1/
With less than 30 minutes of work, I was able to easily locate the original works that were leveraged to craft two of their blogs. That time included verifying the content matched, taking screen shots, confirming the blog was cached at archive.org and posting
2/
the details.
So consider this as you hear @ECCOUNCIL claiming that they tried to prevent plagiarism. No more than 5-10 minutes of human effort per blog and they could have avoided this mess. One has to question, since they didn't, did they really even care?
3/