Was honestly infuriating to work on this review of the costs the Home Office creates for itself and other government departments by making so many wrong initial decisions on asylum applications, and taking such a long time to do so (1/) 🧵
Of the 14,600 initial asylum applications the Home Office rejects each year, 11,500 lodge appeals and around 3,700 of those appeals are successful. So mistakes have been made in the initial process.
Now if I made 3,700 mistakes each year, I’d be fired but... (2/)
So 🎯Key Point A : those mistakes cost £££.
Direct costs to Home Office admin of ~£4m a year

Many times to that to HM Courts and Tribunals Service

Legal aid (though this is complex and v limited) (3/)
But 🎯Key Point B: those mistakes waste time - 25 weeks on average.
That comes on top of the inordinate waits for initial decisions: 71k folks are waiting for an initial decision. There are around 30k applications a year. Read @refugeecouncil on this (4/) media.refugeecouncil.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
As the wait increases, the direct costs do too. The longer people wait for correct decisions, the longer the welfare, housing etc. costs involved.
But also the longer asylum seekers’ health and economic prospects are damaged. So here comes costs for the NHS and the Treasury (5/)
More than 60% of asylum seekers in the UK experience serious mental distress. Being refused asylum is (perhaps unsurprisingly) the strongest predictor of depression and anxiety within this community... (6/)
...and while refugees and asylum seekers are less likely to access NHS services than average, the mean annual total healthcare costs of an adult with serious mental illness is £4,989. So the costs to the NHS of poor Home Office decisions on asylum can quickly add up (7/)
Then there's the cost to the economy and Treasury. As the #LiftTheBan coalition has long stated, most asylum seekers are not permitted to work - with their estimates putting the cost at around £97m a year (8/) refugee-action.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
The evidence @ProBonoEcon collated suggests that the longer asylum seekers are stuck unable to work, the worse their long-term economic prospects. Wages, employment rates and ultimately tax reciepts are diminished as skills get depleted over time (as the graphic shows) (9/10)
So while we discuss how broken the asylum system is in the UK, let's not forget how many of the problems are created not in Calais but in Croydon and Whitehall. You can read the full analysis from @sadiashe, @ConsultOldfield and @jade_siu here
(10/10) probonoeconomics.com/an-unstable-en…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nicole Sykes

Nicole Sykes Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NicoleSykes_

26 Dec 20
✅UK has taken back control
✅EU has protected the integrity of the (now smaller) single market
🤷‍♀️But business has been the awkward teen caught in the divorce.
So bring the leftovers and let’s figure out what this deal means for an A-Z of some of our leading sectors shall we? 1/
✈️Aerospace
So this industry obvs v. worried about reality of customs, but also departure from the EU agency EASA.
This is the first annex I read in full. And it feels like the negotiating teams have pulled off a pretty impressive job here, forging a process to allow 2/
recognition of certificates issued by each other’s agencies. Way beyond anything in CETA. Starts with airworthiness, with the potential to be expanded to include things like pilots training. So going backwards to build up again. But certainly beat my expectation. Points.
Read 4 tweets
7 Dec 20
As we twiddle our thumbs waiting for white smoke from Brussels, this prompted me to reflect on how badly business lost this game. Deal or not, whatever emerges, whenever it emerges, will be a million miles from what business hoped for. How did it go so badly wrong? 🧵(1/)
I’ve lost track of how many times I’ve been told over the last 5yrs that it’s because business wasn’t loud enough. 1st during the referendum (though post-🗳️ analysis tends to agree the economic argument was won, it just wasn’t important enough). 2nd during the negotiations (2/)
I’ve said a lot about this in the past, ultimately - yes biz could have been louder. But there are many reasons why they weren’t.
And volume really isn't everything. Any lobbyist knows that you’re only loud when you’re already losing. It’s a symptom, not a cause, of loss (3/)
Read 15 tweets
23 Nov 20
I know, I know. A lot of news today. But gimme like… 70% of your attention for 2mins.

We know that charities have seen a buttload of additional demand this year. 55% tell @probonoecon they may not be able to service it all. But where’s it coming from? This gives us a clue (1/)
Charities like @DeafBlindUK make up some of the 19% seeing more demand from their existing clients as they help them literally navigate the pandemic.
For them, it's mostly the first kind of demand we've identified - direct Covid consequences such as loneliness, isolation etc (2/)
Then, sure, there are crisis spillover effects. Foodbanks are definitely making up some of the 39% with existing service users needing more help AND new people coming to them.

But (SPOILERS) there are 3 other kinds of demand charities are facing we should pay attention to (3/)
Read 11 tweets
17 Nov 20
Now 4 months into working in the charity sector and… boy. Those 5 years I spent sarcastically muttering at the void about government needing better partnership with and support for business… I didn’t know how good the private sector had it. THREAD (1/10)
At every corner during the Covid crisis, financial support schemes have been designed for the private sector and (with the noteable exception of the £750m fund) charities have to make do with it. But it’s like charities have been handed their big brother’s oversized jumper (2/10)
Furlough works if you run a brewery chain. Send staff home and claim back their salaries when pubs close and orders dry up. But it doesn’t work it you run a charity providing support to families of alcoholics, seeing rising need and unable to bench your teams to save costs (3/10)
Read 10 tweets
13 Aug 20
Yesterday’s GDP numbers showed a wee uptick in June, but we’re all still expecting jobs to keep bouncing down the rocky hill for a long while yet. Some of the reasons are obvious -end of furlough, second wave- but, in case of interest, some of the other less obvious ones: (1/6)
1. JRS/loans were designed for firms facing immediate loss of demand. But a bunch will experience a lag eg. The visual effects artists still able to work on film shot over Winter over Spring. But once processed, there’s nothing new to work on & help is less useful/withdrawn (2/6)
On a larger scale is fashion. There’s a debate raging about the wasted stock that was never sold this Spring. Reselling in Spring 2021 would strip work from fashion designers and manufacturers. One solution to drag it out rather than create new gap (3/6) drapersonline.com/news/is-covid-…
Read 7 tweets
18 May 20
So you’re a CEO trying to run a business from your study. Your husband’s looking after the kids for the afternoon, you miraculously have a spare 5 minutes. With the news about negotiations, Brexit has been nagging at the back of your mind. What are we doing on that again? THREAD
You start emailing the lead of your Brexit planning team. Damn. They’ve been seconded onto your coronavirus team because crisis management skills are useful.
After 15 minutes of digging you give up, ask your PA if they can find the plans, call your CFO about the latest figures 2/
4 virtual meetings about face mask procurement and the rising mental health issues of your staff later, at least one and half of the kids are asleep. Your email pings with a file from your PA containing your old no deal plans. You open it. Swear again. 3/
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(