A man tried to carry a gun aboard a plane. Detected, he lunged for the weapon and (apparently unintentionally) fired it. Three people were hurt. Injuries non-lethal, but who wants to suffer a bullet wound because some dumbass can't be separated from his security blanket? 1/x
The incident made national news, with a lot of emphasis on how "accidental" the whole incident was. Except, it isn't really all that accidental, is it? 2/x
Whatever the true intentions of the Atlanta airport gun carrier, the United States has engineered a gun-law system that encourages people to carry guns everywhere they go. And indeed, if guns are welcome now at churches, schools, bars - why *not* a plane too? 3/x
As of mid-October -well before the holiday flying season began - the TSA had apprehended 4500 weapons at airport check-ins, a 20-year record. But the statistic is even worse than it sounds, because air travel is still depressed from pre-pandemic peaks. 4/x
In 2019, the TSA apprehended some 4400 guns - but that was 5 guns for every 1 million passengers screened. The 4500 guns as of mid-October 2021 = 11 for every passenger screened. IE gun carrying by air travelers has doubled since before the pandemic. 5/x washingtonpost.com/transportation…
When caught, gun carriers often say they "forgot" they had a gun in their bag. If true, that's not an encouraging indication about the mental acuity of America's gun owners. But fairly obviously, it's not true. They just have that little respect for laws and rules. 6/x
American culture valorizes the so-called responsible gun owner. But American law doesn't do much to sift the responsible for the irresponsible. And there are maybe 50 million more guns in Americans purses, belts, and backpacks post-pandemic than there were only two years ago. END
Update/correction: The three people injured at Atlanta after the gun shot at TSA did not suffer bullet wounds. They were caught up in the rush of passengers who feared that an active-shooter massacre had erupted at the airport. 1/x
Fortunately for the air travelers in Atlanta, the mass shootings for November 20, 2021, occurred instead in Fresno, California (2 dead, 2 injured) and Berwyn, Illinois (4 injured). gunviolencearchive.org/mass-shooting
It's incredible that Americans choose to live this way
@TheAtlantic Impressive, in a way, how much uproar has been raised over critical-race-theory while thousands of attempts each year to smuggle guns onto airplanes barely rate news mention.
@TheAtlantic I'd call America's indifference to gun carnage a "dog bites man" story - only I just looked it up, and an American is more than 10x as likely to be shot by a gun as bitten by a dog seriously enough to warrant hospitalization. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19364181/
Vivid account of last night's violent anti-vax rampage in Rotterdam. Police fired warning shots after the anti-vaxxers hurled stones at cops and torched a police car. japantoday.com/category/world…
Interesting profile of Rotterdam's remarkable mayor. Born in Morocco, he said after the Charlie Hebdo massacre of 2015: "If you do not like it here because some humorists you don’t like are making a newspaper, then, if I may say so, you can fuck off.” ozy.com/news-and-polit…
From a policy point of view, the full SALT deduction may be hard to justify. But politically - in 2017, hedge fundies raised taxes on their accountants and kids' orthodontists to meet budgeting rules for their own tax cuts. Now the accountants and orthodontists are striking back.
You may have forgotten just *why* the GOP targeted SALT deduction in 2017. To pass a tax cut with 50 votes in the Senate, not 60, the cut must purport to be deficit-neutral over 10 years. SALT repeal raised $1.3 trillion to offset super-high-end tax cuts. ncsl.org/ncsl-in-dc/pub…
If you are seriously rich, trading your SALT deduction for other benefits makes sense - especially if you live in a low-tax state like Florida or Texas. But if you were a high-income, low-asset professional in CA, NJ, or NY, the trade-off hurt bad.
... it can truthfully say things like, "I do not espouse violence towards anyone." But not both. You can't truthfully endorse intimidation and then profess to repudiate violence.
I could fill this TL with examples of elected officials and serious candidates for office basing their appeal on their willingness to use violence to advance their goals. "Espousing violence" is the central message
Joining from an actual TV studio. Rate THEIR room!
Link to my CNN New Day appearance re Steve Bannon indictment. Probably was a little too spicy for the 6 am ET hour, better after it's cooled on the windowsill for an hour or two. video.snapstream.net/Play/aeVSSmyKI…
Many people on Twitter are reacting this morning to Abigail Spanberger's "Nobody elected him to be FDR" quote.
"I did!" many voices answer. Ok, so you want FDR? Here's a story about FDR ... 1/x
In May 1936, Roosevelt's postmaster general James Farley spoke at the Michigan Democratic state convention. Postmaster General was a very big job in those days, and Farley functioned as FDR's de facto campaign manager. So people listened carefully. 2/x
n the speech, Farley referenced a likely FDR opponent in the election ahead, Kansas Governor Alf Landon. He described Landon as governor of a "typical prairie state." 3/x
Reflection on 8 days without Twitter: I felt myself somewhat more productive, but significantly less informed about anything beyond my immediate information environment. Reminded me that for all its downsides, this platform really is a gift - *if* you set your notifications right
Just finished audiobook of Stanley Payne's personal memoir + opinionated summary of his years of writing Spanish history. No mincing words about Franco, but also no romanticism about the misdeeds of the 2nd republic. You won't find a better short intro uwpress.wisc.edu/books/4844.htm