Totalitarian ideologies use politics to determine personal morality. That's how Chappaquiddick Ted and Bill Clinton became champions of feminism, and that's how a child molester becomes a lovable scamp called "JoJo."
Totalitarians also have no patience for the presumption of innocence when it hinders their political objectives. Totalitarians assume if you support due process for an individual, you must also endorse that individual's actions and politics - because that's how THEY do it.
For the totalitarian, there is no irredeemable sin except having the "wrong" politics. Especially when it comes to powerful people, correct political action and support for the right policies are the only true yardsticks for morality. Deeds are less important than positions.
There are only angels and demons, and only by examining their political positions - and their usefulness to the Party - can their feathered wings or cruel horns be measured. Totalitarians will gleefully invent positive qualities for anyone deemed to be on the side of the angels.
We've seen this over and over in recent American political history. People with ugly rap sheets are improbably canonized and gentle and sensitive because they were killed while committing violent crimes against people the Party has classified as demons.
Good politics give you wings, no matter how dirty your hands might be. Totalitarians subtly advertise their power by demonstrating they can demonize or canonize ANYONE. Get with the Party and your sins will be wiped clean. Oppose the Party and you will be damned forever.
For totalitarians, the presumption of innocence is not a right, but a gift the Party bestows upon its faithful, and withholds from its enemies. "Social justice" movements presume everyone with incorrect politics is guilty - therefore innocence is granted to their accusers. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Lefties assume everything is static, which is not surprising for an ideology that prizes obedience as the most valuable resource. They are confounded by dynamic responses and unpredictability. They really think $1 in tax hikes should produce $1 in government revenue.
This is why socialists think the trappings of middle-class life can be distributed as government welfare benefits to create an acceptable facsimile of prosperity. What's the difference between buying food and using food stamps? Between earning income and receiving benefits?
But economics is all about both the journey AND the destination. Assets have little true value when they're at rest. Their value comes from what we do with them, and how those decisions are made. Every economic action creates energy, including the negative energy of cost.
The pitfall of superhero cinema, which the great directors criticizing it allude to, is not the inherent silliness of the genre. One of Shakespeare's great works is about fairies crashing a wedding. Legendary heroes of old threw animals into the sky to become constellations.
Science fiction and fantasy are filled with supernatural powers, extraordinary beings, hidden identities - all the components of superhero mythology. The problem isn't whimsy or absurdity. It's lazy storytelling, which comes down to a lack of consequence, the absence of tragedy.
The writers who strove to give superheroes more gravitas in the 80s and make them respectable fiction were acutely aware of this. Frank Miller's genius innovation was to write the tragic ending of the Batman saga. Alan Moore had a supervillain win by killing millions.
Totalitarians constantly rewrite history not only to make the past conform to Party ideology, but as a means of demoralization and control. There is nothing more dispiriting than being forced to relinquish your history and recite a false new one. Kill a tree by cutting its roots.
Controlling history lets totalitarians construct a narrative of "false consciousness" around their adversaries. Those who remember true history, and cherish traditions disliked by the Party, are treated like they're insane. Accurate memory becomes a form of mental illness.
When history is written in sand, shifting and changing as Party leadership demands, the people become anxious and fearful. Remembering the "wrong" thing can get you in trouble. You have to pay close attention to Party decrees to know today's "correct" history.
If some of the lefty social media hot takes on the Rittenhouse trial seem confusing, understand they think left-wing stormtroopers and rioters have an absolute right to occupy and destroy any territory they please, and if there are injuries when you oppose them, it's on YOU.
This is the core logic of terrorism: our cause is righteous, our demands must be granted, and if you force us to hurt you or destroy your property to get what we want, it's YOUR fault. You can stop the violence at any time by submitting. The ball is in YOUR court.
Needless to say, the Left does not think anyone but themselves has any such intrinsic right to occupy and destroy. They believe they have a monopoly on righteous political violence. Only THEY should be given "space to destroy."
We're entering the dangerous kamikaze phase of the Democrat's all-out War on the Middle Class. As with Obamacare, leadership will be telling imperiled Dems their seats are a small price to pay for inflicting irreversible changes on the American people.
There is no one on Earth as rapacious, greedy, and materialistic as a socialist politician. Dems understand that grabbing our money ends a political battle. Once the spending bills are passed, budget baselines rise, and government employees are hired, there is no going back.
The lesson of Obamacare will be repeated to doomed Dems as they tie on their kamikaze headbands. Sure, we got clobbered in a few elections - but we seized control of a huge chunk of the U.S. economy forever! We permanently changed the relationship between citizens and the State!
A strong factor in U.S. elections is the public's growing awareness that the political elite are completely insulated from the effects of the policies they impose on the rest of us. It correctly makes voters wary of those policies.
Private jets and giant motorcades at global warming conferences, people who live behind armed guards crusading against gun rights, elite leftists trying to abolish the police in troubled neighborhoods, diehard enemies of school choice sending THEIR kids to private schools...
It's all hypocritical, sure, but the public reaction is growing into more than just annoyance at flagrant hypocrisy. It is sobering to realize that the people trying to control every aspect of your life have no intention whatsoever of sharing the burdens they impose on you.