John Pierce, the lawyer with a history of ties to conservative clients and causes who has been repping a number of Jan. 6 defendants, has entered an appearance for Jacob Chansley, the week after Chansley was sentenced (see: buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…)
John Pierce has sent out a statement confirming his representation of Jacob Chansley, laying out a few options they're considering for challenging Chansley's conviction/sentence, and includes a fundraising pitch for a nonprofit he founded that he says is backing this effort
Twist: In response to John Pierce entering an appearance for Capitol rioter Jacob Chansley, Al Watkins – Chansley's original lawyer – puts out a statement saying he "has been and remains counsel of record" and that Chansley didn't authorize Pierce to step in
Another update on attorney John Pierce: He's moved to withdraw from the case of Jan. 6 defendant Peter Schwartz — "...developed conflicts that are irreconcilable and have led to an irreparable breakdown in the relationship"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Back to regularly scheduled programming: Hello from Judge Royce Lamberth's virtual courtroom, where sentencing is underway for Capitol rioter Frank Scavo. Govt seeking 14 days, Scavo wants probation.
"Capitol steps stormed."
"It’s going down."
"No certification Today!!!"
AUSA Seth Meinero is up, and begins with a focus on evidence that Scavo would have understood there was a riot happening — he notes Scavo came in through Rotunda doors, where rioters clashed with the "thin line" of USCP officers trying to stop people from getting in
Hello from Judge Amit Mehta's virtual courtroom, where sentencing is underway for Capitol rioter John Lolos. He pleaded guilty to the parading misdemeanor, more on his case -->
Lolos is addressing the court, and begins by talking about how he went to DC after seeing "voter fraud on TV," notes how the affidavits that Trump allies introduced in court were rejected, says the DOJ/FBI response was "sad to see"
Hello again from Judge Carl Nichols' virtual courtroom, where sentencing is about to start for Capitol rioter David Mish. Mish pleaded guilty to the parading misdemeanor and is asking for 2 days incarceration. Govt wants 30 days in jail. s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2105…
Mish had contacted MPD the day after the Capitol riot to say he had information about Ashli Babbitt's death, and admitted being inside the building
AUSA explains one reason they're asking for jail time for Mish is his previous criminal history record - in the sentencing memo they acknowledge it's mostly low-level offenses and from his youth, but say it shows "lack of respect for the law"
Down the metaphorical hallway: Hello from Judge Dabney Friedrich's virtual courtroom, where a plea hearing is about to begin for Jan. 6 def Jason Riddle, photographed with a bottle of wine and accused of stealing/selling a Senate procedure book for $40 s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2047…
There's an issue w/ different versions of the plea agreement being signed by the defense and the govt, respectively. It doesn't sound like there are big differences, but Riddle needs time to review the doc to make sure he understands what's on paper, so they'll come back in a bit
Back on the record for Jason Riddle's plea hearing — he's pleading guilty to theft of government property (re: the Senate procedure book that he sold for $40) and the parading, demonstrating, or picketing misdemeanor that's been part of most Jan. 6 plea deals to date
Hello from Judge Carl Nichols' virtual courtroom, where Steve Bannon is set to make his next appearance (remotely) in his criminal contempt case. He's waived a formal arraignment and asked the judge to accept his initial not guilty plea on the papers: s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2111…
Assuming there's no issue with Bannon's handling of the formal arraignment, we'd expect this hearing mostly to be about setting a schedule for next steps in his case
Here's the dial-in info for Judge Nichols:
Toll Free Number: 877-873-8017
Access Code: 8692421
Jan. 6 defendant Matthew Perna intends to plead guilty to the full four-count indictment returned against him (felony obstructing Congress + misdemeanors), with no agreement with the govt, per new filing.
The only other Jan. 6 case I'm aware of so far where there's been a guilty plea and no deal with the government was for Antionne Brodnax - I didn't cover that plea hearing and we haven't gotten sentencing memos yet so I don't have more details on what happened there
In September, Perna's lawyer asked for a pre-plea analysis of the sentencing guidelines as applied to his client, to see if whatever terms the govt was offering were worth taking a deal (it appears the answer to that question was no)